Title: A Proactively Controlled Study Between Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy and Open Radical Gastrectomy
Abstract: Objective To compare and analyze the clinical curative effect between laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy. Methods 120 cases of gastric cancer patients underwent gastrectomy of stomach neoplasms in our hospital were divided into laparoscopic group and laparotomy group, 60 cases in each group, according to different treatment they received. We followed up two groups of patients after treatment for observing the treatment effect. Results The length of incision, blood loss, operative time and hospital stay of laparoscopic group were(5.5±1.2) cm,(61.1±31.2)mL,(249±49)min and(9.0±6.5)d orderly. Compared with those of the laparotomy group, the differences had statistical significance(all P0.05). But the difference of number of lymph node cleaning had no statistical significance(P0.05). All the patients of two groups were followed up. The recurrence rate, transfer rate and fatality rate of laparoscopic group was 5.0%(3 cases), 5.0%(3 cases) and 6.7%(4 cases) orderly. Compared with those of the laparotomy group, the differences had no statistical significance(all P0.05). Conclusion Compared with open radical gastrectomy, laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has less trauma and faster recovery without affecting the completeness of gastric cancer resection, and does not significantly increase transfer rate, recurrence rate and fatality rate in a short period of time, which is worthy of further clinical promotion.
Publication Year: 2013
Publication Date: 2013-01-01
Language: en
Type: article
Access and Citation
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot