Title: <b>Dual Chamber, Rate Adaptive Pacing in Patients with Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias:</b> Protective Measures for Rate Control
Abstract: Pacing and Clinical ElectrophysiologyVolume 16, Issue 11 p. 2168-2185 Dual Chamber, Rate Adaptive Pacing in Patients with Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias: Protective Measures for Rate Control HARRY G. MOND, Corresponding Author HARRY G. MOND Department of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, AustraliaAddress for reprints: Harry G. Mond, M.D., Department of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, 3050, Australia. Fax: 011-61-3-347-6760.Search for more papers by this authorS. SERGE BAROLD, S. SERGE BAROLD Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, The Cenesee Hospital and The University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New YorkSearch for more papers by this author HARRY G. MOND, Corresponding Author HARRY G. MOND Department of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, AustraliaAddress for reprints: Harry G. Mond, M.D., Department of Cardiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, 3050, Australia. Fax: 011-61-3-347-6760.Search for more papers by this authorS. SERGE BAROLD, S. SERGE BAROLD Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, The Cenesee Hospital and The University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New YorkSearch for more papers by this author First published: November 1993 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb01022.xCitations: 39AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References 1 Barold SS, Santini M. Natural history of sick sinus syndrome after pacemaker implantation. In SS Barold, J Mugica, (eds.): Perspectives in Cardiac Pacing 3. Mount Kisco , NY , Futura Publishing Company, Inc., 1993, pp. 169– 211. 2 Heldman D, Mulvihill D, Nguyen H, et al. True incidence of pacemaker syndrome. PACE 1990; 13: 1742– 1750. 3 Rediker D, Eagle K, Homma S, et al. Clinical and hemodynamic: comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 1988; 61: 323– 329. 4 Sulke N, Dritsas A, Bostock J, et al. "Subclinical" pacemaker syndrome: A randomized study of symptom-free patients with ventricular demand VVI pacemakers upgraded to dual-chamber devices. Br Heart J 1992; 67: 57– 64. 5 Hesselson AB, Parsonnet V, Bernstein AD, et al. Deleterious effect of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome; The hidden benefits of dual chamber pacing. J Amer Coll Cardiol 1992; 19: 1542– 1549. 6 Sutton R, Kenny RA. The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. PACE 1986; 9: 1110– 1114. 7 Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schuller H. Long term pacing in sinus node disease: Effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am Heart J 1988; 116: 16– 22. 8 Zanini R, Facchinetti AI, Gallo C, et al. Morbidity and mortality of patients with sick sinus syndrome. Comparative effects of atrial and ventricular pacing. PACE 1990; 13: 2076– 2079. 9 Santini M, Alexidou G, Ansalone G, et al. Relation of prognosis in sick sinus syndrome to age, conduction defect and modes of permanent cardiac pacing. Am J Cardiol 1990; 65: 729– 735. 10 Sethi KK, Bajaj V, Mohan JC, et al. Comparison of atrial and VVI pacing modes in symptomatic sinus node dysfunction without associated tachyarrhythmias. Indian Heart J 1990; 42: 143– 147. 11 Bianconi L, Boccadamo R, Di Florio A., et al. Atrial versus ventricular stimulation in sick sinus syndrome. Effect on morbidity and mortality, (abstract) PACE 1989; 12: 1236. 12 Sasaki Y, Furihata A, Snyama K, et al. Comparison between ventricular inhibited pacing and physiologic pacing in sick sinus syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1991; 67: 771– 774. 13 Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Castle LW, et al. Incidence and predictors of loss of pacing in the atrium in patients with sick sinus syndrome. PACE 1992; 15: 2050– 2054. 14 Kosakai Y, Ohe T, Kamakura S, et al. Long term follow-up of incidence of embolism in sick sinus syndrome after pacing, (abstract) PACE 1991; 14: 680. 15 Crimm W, Langenfeld H, Maisch B, et al. Symptoms, cardiovascular risk profile and spontaneous ECG in paced patients: A five-year follow-up study. PACE 1990; 13: 2086– 2090. 16 Ishikawa T, Kimura K, Miyazaki N, et al. Preventive effects of pacemakers on atrial fibrillation in patients with tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome, (abstract) Eur J Pacing Electrophysiol 1992; 22(SuppI 1A): A27. 17 Nürnberg M, Frohner K, Podczeck A, et al. Is VVI pacing more dangerous than A-V sequential pacing in patients with sick sinus node syndrome? (abstract) PACE 1991; 14: 674. 18 Sgarbossa EB, Pinski SL, Castle LW, et al. Determinants of chronic atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients with sick sinus syndrome, (abstract) PACE 1992; 15: 511. 19 Stangl K, Seitz K, Wirtzfeld A, et al. Differences between atrial single chamber pacing (AAI) and ventricular single chamber pacing (VVI) with respect to prognosis and antiarrhythmic effect in patients with sick sinus syndrome. PACE 1990; 13; 2080– 2085. 20 Alpert MA, Curtis JJ, Sanfelippo JF, et al. Comparative survival following permanent ventricular and dual chamber pacing for patients with chronic symptomatic sinus node dysfunction with and without heart failure. Am Heart J 1987; 113: 958– 965. 21 Witte J, Knorre GH, Volkmann HJ, et al. Survival rate in sick sinus syndrome patients; AAI/DDD vs VVI pacing. In M Santini, M Pistolese, A Alliegro, (eds.): Progress in Clinical Pacing 1992. Mount Kisco , NY , Futura Media Services, 1993, pp. 175– 177. 22 Maho P, Denjoy I, Leclercq L, et al. Comparative efficacy of permanent atrial pacing in vagal atrial arrhythmias and in bradycardia-tachycardia syndrome. (abstract) PACE 1989; 12: 1236. 23 Attuel P, Pellerin D, Mugica J, et al. DDD pacing: An effective treatment modality for recurrent atrial arrhythmias. PACE 1988; 11: 1147– 1654. 24 Hayes DL, Neubauer SA. Incidence of atrial fibrillation after DDD pacing, (abstract) PACE 1990; 13: 501. 25 Barr E, Hummel J, Hanich R, et al. VVIR pacing causes more arrhythmias and adverse symptoms than DDD pacing. (abstract) RBM 1990; 12: 57. 26 Calley D, Elharrar C, Ammor M, et al. Is chronic atrial pacing protective against atrial fibrillation? (abstract) RBM 1990: 12: 92. 27 Ishikawa T, Taki S, Kimura K, et al. Atrial load and incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients treated by pacemakers. (abstract) Eur Heart J 1992; 13: 419. 28 Clarke M, Sutton R, Ward D, et al. Recommendations for pacemaker prescription for symptomatic bradycardia. Report of a working party of the British Pacing and Eiectrophysiology Group. Br Heart J 1991; 66: 185– 191. 29 Brandt J, Fahraeus T, Ogawa T, et al. Practical aspects of rate-adaptive atrial (AAIR) pacing: Clinical experiences in 44 patients. PAGE 1991; 14: 1258– 1264. 30 Brandt J, Schuller H. Considerations for the selection of rate-adaptive single lead atrial (AAIR) pacing. In SS Barold, J Mugica, (eds.): New Perspectives in Cardiac Pacing 3. Mount Kisco , NY , Futura Puhlishing Company, Inc., 1993, In press. 31 Griffin JC. The optimal pacing mode for the individual patient; The role of DDDR. In SS Barold, J Mugica, (eds.): New Perspectives in Cardiac Pacing 2. Mount Kisco , NY , Futura Publishing Company, Inc., 1991, pp. 325– 338. 32 Sutton R. Pacing in atrial arrhythmias. PAGE 1990; 13: 1823– 1827. 33 Dodinot B. Stimulation cardiaque ãG fréquence asservie. Ann Gardiol Angeiol 1990; 39: 597– 605. 34 Gurry PVL, Rowland E, Krikler DM. Dual-demand pacing for refractory atrioventricular re-entry tachycardia. PAGE 1979; 2: 137– 151. 35 Mond H, Strathmore N, Kertes P, et al. Rate responsive pacing using a minute ventilation sensor. PAGE 1988; 11: 1866– 1874. 36 Lau CP, Tai YT, Fong PG, et al. Atrial arrhythmia management with sensor controlled atrial refractory period and automatic mode switching in patients with minute ventilation sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers. PAGE 1992; 15: 1504– 1514. 37 Barold SS, Pupillo GA, Gaidula JJ, et al. Ghest wall stimulation in the evaluation of patients with implanted ventricular-inhibited demand pacemakers. Brit Heart J 1970; 32: 783– 789. 38 Mond H. The Cardiac Pacemaker. Function and malfunction. New York , NY , Grune and Stratton, 1983, pp. 270– 277. 39 Lau CP, Tai YT, Fong PG, et al. The use of implantable sensors for the control of pacemaker mediated tachycardias: A comparative evaluation between minute ventilation sensing and acceleration sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers. PAGE 1992; 15: 34– 44. 40 Vanerio G, Patel S, Ching E, et al. Early clinical experience with the minute ventilation sensor DDDR pacemaker. PACE 1991; 14: 1815– 1820. 41 Lau CP. Sensors and pacemaker mediated tachycardias. PAGE 1991; 14: 495– 498. 42 Mond H. Minute ventilation based rate adaptive pacing. In DG Benditt (ed.): Rate Adaptive Cardiac Pacing: Current technologies and clinical applications. Cambridge , MA , Blackwell Scientific Publications, Inc., 1993, In press. 43 Higano ST, Hayes DL, Eisinger G. Sensor-driven rate smoothing in a DDDR pacemaker. PACE 1989; 12: 922– 929. 44 Ilvento J, Fee JA, Shewmaker AA. Automatic mode switching from DDDR to VVIR. A management algorithm for atrial arrhythmias in patients with dual chamber pacemakers, (abstract) PACE 1990; 13: 1199. 45 Gibson S, Paul V, Ward D, et al. Differentiation of atrial arrhythmias from sinus rhythm by DDDR pacemakers, (abstract) Eur Heart J 1990; 11; 313. 46 Clementy J, Rouves D, Dulhoste MN, et al. DDD pacing after AV ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; First results, (abstract) Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1992; 2: A65. 47 Sweesy M, Batey R, Forney R, et al. Automatic mode change in a DDDR pacemaker for supraventricular tachyarrbythmias. (abstract) PACE 1991; 14: 737. 48 Davis M, Pitney M, May C. Automatic mode switching and program selection in a rate adaptive dual chamber pacemaker. (abstract) PAGE 1991; 14: 664. 49 Brinker J, Simmons T, Kay N, et al. Initial experience with a minute ventilation based dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker, (abstract) PACE 1991; 14: 663. 50 Lau CP, Tai YT, Fong PC, et al. Atrial arrhythmia management with sensor controlled atrial refractory period and automatic mode switching in patients with minute ventilation sensing dual chamber rate adaptive pacemakers. PACE 1992; 15: 1504– 1514. 51 Kappenberger LJ, Herper SL. Rate responsive dual chamber pacing. PACE 1986; 9: 987– 991. 52 Mugica J, Barold SS, Ripart A. The smart pacemaker. In SS Barold, J Mugica, (eds.): New Perspectives in Cardiac Pacing 2. Mount Kisco , NY , Futura Pubhshing Company, Inc., 1991, pp. 545– 577. 53 Lee MT, Adkins A, Woodson D, et al. A new feature for control of inappropriate high rate tracking in DDDR pacemakers. PACE 1990; 13: 1852– 1855. 54 Lau GP, Tai YT, Fong PG, et al. Clinical experience with an activity sensing DDDR pacemaker using an accelerometer. PACE 1992; 15: 334– 343. 55 Mahaux V, Verboven Y, Waleffe A, et al. Initial experience with a new sensor driven algorithm limiting ventricular pacing rate during supraventricular tachycardia, (abstract) PACE 1992; 15: 577. 56 Brunner U, Mahaux V, Benitez J. Worldwide clinical experience with a new accelerometer based rate adaptive pacing system, (abstract) Eur J Cardiac Pacing Electrophysiol 1992; 2: A20. 57 Adler SC, Lee MT, Galfee RV. Design considerations for a dual chamber, dual sensor pulse generator. (abstract) PACE 1987; 10: 1205. 58 Floro J, Gastellanet M, Florio J, et al. DDL: A new mode for cardiac pacing. Clin Prog Pacing and Electrophysiol 1984; 2: 255– 260. 59 Parsonnet V, Furman S, Smyth PD. Implantable cardiac pacemakers status report and resource guideline. Pacemaker study group. Circulation 1974; 50: A21– A35. 60 Barold SS. The DDI mode of cardiac pacing. PACE 1987; 10: 480– 484. 61 Erlebacher JA, Stelzer P. Inappropriate ventricular blanking in a DDI pacemaker. PAGE 1986: 9: 519– 521. 62 Bertuso J, Kapoor AS, Schafer J. A case of ventricular undersensing in the DDI mode: Cause and correction. PACE 1986; 9: 685– 689. 63 Sutton R, Ingram A, Kenny P, et al. Clinical experience of DDI pacing. In B Belhassen, S Feldman, Y Copperman, (eds.): Proceedings of the Vlllth world symposium on cardiac pacing and eiectrophysiology. Israel , Keterpress Enterprises, 1987, pp. 161– 163. 64 Vanerio G, Maloney JD, Pinski SL, et al. DDIR versus VVIR pacing in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias. PACE 1991; 14: 1630– 1638. 65 Buckingham TA, Janosik DL, Pearson G. Pacemaker hemodynamics: Clinical implications. Prog Cardiovasc Diseases 1992; 34: 347– 366. 66 Stewart WJ, Dicola VC, Harthorne JW, et al. Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac output in patients with physiologic pacemakers. Effects of left ventricular function and retrograde ventriculoatrial conduction. Am J Cardiol 1984; 54: 308– 312. 67 Labovitz AJ, Williams GA, Redd RM, et al. Noninvasive assessment of pacemaker hemodynamics by doppler echocardiography: Importance of left Btrial size. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 6: 196– 200. 68 Erlebacher JA, Danner RL, Stelzer PE. Hypotension with ventricular pacing: An atrial vasodepressor reflex in human beings. J Am Coll Gardiol 1984; 4: 550– 555. 69 Schuller H, Brandt J. The Pacemaker Syndrome: Old and new causes. Glin Gardiol 1991; 14: 336– 340. 70 Sulke N, Chambers J, Dritsas A, et al. A randomiced double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 696– 706. 71 Higano ST, Hayes D, Eisinger G. Advantage of discrepant upper rate limits in a DDDR pacemaker. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 64: 932– 939. 72 Barold SS. Electrocardiograpby of rate-adaptive dual-chamber (DDDR) pacemakers. Upper rate behavior. In: E Alt, SS Barold, K Stangl, (eds.): Rate Adaptive Cardiac Pacing. Heidelberg , Germany , Springer-Verlag, 1993, In press. 73 Medtronic Technical Manual. EliteR Models 7074, 7075, 7076, 7077. Activity responsive dual chamber pacemakers with telemetry. Minneapolis , MN , Medtronic, Inc., 1991. 74 Medtronic Technical Manual. SynergystR II, Models 7070, 7071. Activity responsive dual chamber pacemaker with telemetry. Minneapolis , MN , Medtronic, Inc., 1989. Citing Literature Volume16, Issue11November 1993Pages 2168-2185 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Publication Year: 1993
Publication Date: 1993-11-01
Language: en
Type: review
Indexed In: ['crossref', 'pubmed']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 48
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot