Title: Frequent Multiple Insemination in a Natural Population of Drosophila pseudoobscura
Abstract: Previous articleNext article No AccessLetters to the EditorsFrequent Multiple Insemination in a Natural Population of Drosophila pseudoobscuraWyatt W. AndersonWyatt W. AndersonPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 108, Number 963Sep. - Oct., 1974 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/282949 Views: 6Total views on this site Citations: 82Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1974 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Paris Veltsos, Damiano Porcelli, Yongxiang Fang, Andrew R. Cossins, Michael G. Ritchie, Rhonda R. Snook Experimental sexual selection reveals rapid evolutionary divergence in sex‐specific transcriptomes and their interactions following mating, Molecular Ecology 31, no.1212 (Apr 2022): 3374–3388.https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16473Martin D. Garlovsky, Luke Holman, Andrew L. Brooks, Zorana K. Novicic, Rhonda R. Snook Experimental sexual selection affects the evolution of physiological and life‐history traits, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 35, no.55 (Apr 2022): 742–751.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.14003Malin Ah-King A Female Turn in Bird Research, (Jan 2023): 127–167.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7161-7_4Malin Ah-King Shifting Perceptions about Female Insects, Snakes, Frogs, Lizards, Fishes and Spiders, (Jan 2023): 169–216.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7161-7_5Aurore Gallot, Sandrine Sauzet, Emmanuel Desouhant, William J. Etges Kin recognition: Neurogenomic response to mate choice and sib mating avoidance in a parasitic wasp, PLOS ONE 15, no.1010 (Oct 2020): e0241128.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241128Dean M. Castillo, Leonie C. Moyle Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286, no.18991899 (Mar 2019): 20182535.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2535Timothy L. Karr, Helen Southern, Matthew A. Rosenow, Toni I. Gossmann, Rhonda R. Snook The Old and the New: Discovery Proteomics Identifies Putative Novel Seminal Fluid Proteins in Drosophila, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 18 (Mar 2019): S23–S33.https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.RA118.001098Paris Veltsos, Yongxiang Fang, Andrew R. Cossins, Rhonda R. Snook, Michael G. Ritchie Mating system manipulation and the evolution of sex-biased gene expression in Drosophila, Nature Communications 8, no.11 (Dec 2017).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02232-6Sergio Castrezana, Brant C. Faircloth, William C. Bridges, Patricia Adair Gowaty Polyandry enhances offspring viability with survival costs to mothers only when mating exclusively with virgin males in Drosophila melanogaster, Ecology and Evolution 7, no.1818 (Aug 2017): 7515–7526.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3152Merel C. Breedveld, Luis M. San-Jose, Cristina Romero-Diaz, Eduardo R.S. Roldan, Patrick S. Fitze Mate availability affects the trade-off between producing one or multiple annual clutches, Animal Behaviour 123 (Jan 2017): 43–51.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.025Allan Debelle, Michael G. Ritchie, Rhonda R. Snook EVOLUTION OF DIVERGENT FEMALE MATING PREFERENCE IN RESPONSE TO EXPERIMENTAL SEXUAL SELECTION, Evolution 68, no.99 (Jul 2014): 2524–2533.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12473Paul Herrera, Michelle L. Taylor, Alison Skeats, Tom A. R. Price, Nina Wedell Can patterns of chromosome inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura predict polyandry across a geographical cline?, Ecology and Evolution 4, no.1515 (Jul 2014): 3072–3081.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1165Robert C. Cope, Janet M. Lanyon, Jennifer M. Seddon, Philip K. Pollett Development and testing of a genetic marker‐based pedigree reconstruction system 'PR‐genie' incorporating size‐class data, Molecular Ecology Resources 14, no.44 (Jan 2014): 857–870.https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12219Elina Immonen, Rhonda R. Snook, Michael G. Ritchie Mating system variation drives rapid evolution of the female transcriptome in Drosophila pseudoobscura, Ecology and Evolution 4, no.1111 (May 2014): 2186–2201.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1098Patricia Adair Gowaty Adaptively flexible polyandry, Animal Behaviour 86, no.55 (Nov 2013): 877–884.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.08.015Therese A. Markow, Stephen Beall, Sergio Castrezana The wild side of life, Fly 6, no.22 (Oct 2014): 98–101.https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.19552Patricia Adair Gowaty The evolution of multiple mating, Fly 6, no.11 (Oct 2014): 3–11.https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.18330T.A.R. Price, Z. Lewis, D.T. Smith, G.D.D. Hurst, N. Wedell Remating in the laboratory reflects rates of polyandry in the wild, Animal Behaviour 82, no.66 (Dec 2011): 1381–1386.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.022Yong‐Kyu KIM, Mary Beth WEBER, Wyatt W. ANDERSON, Patricia Adair GOWATY Preference status does not indicate intrinsic quality differences in Drosophila pseudoobscura, Integrative Zoology 5, no.33 (Sep 2010): 198–207.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00205.xPatricia Adair Gowaty, Yong-Kyu Kim, Jessica Rawlings, W. W. Anderson Polyandry increases offspring viability and mother productivity but does not decrease mother survival in Drosophila pseudoobscura, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, no.3131 (Jul 2010): 13771–13776.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1006174107B. SHUTT, L. STABLES, F. ABOAGYE-ANTWI, J. MORAN, F. TRIPET Male accessory gland proteins induce female monogamy in anopheline mosquitoes, Medical and Veterinary Entomology 24, no.11 (Mar 2010): 91–94.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00849.xH. S. CRUDGINGTON, S. FELLOWS, R. R. SNOOK Increased opportunity for sexual conflict promotes harmful males with elevated courtship frequencies, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23, no.22 (Jan 2010): 440–446.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01907.xDEAN A. CROSHAW, MAUREEN B. PETERS, TRAVIS C. GLENN Comparing the performance of analytical techniques for genetic parentage of half-sib progeny arrays, Genetics Research 91, no.55 (Nov 2009): 313–325.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672309990231Patricia Adair Gowaty, Stephen P. Hubbell Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: It's about time, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, no.supplement_1supplement_1 (Jun 2009): 10017–10024.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901130106Helen S. Crudgington, Sarah Fellows, Nichola S. Badcock, Rhonda R. Snook EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION OF SEXUAL SELECTION PROMOTES GREATER MALE MATING CAPACITY BUT DOES NOT ALTER SPERM INVESTMENT, Evolution 63, no.44 (Apr 2009): 926–938.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00601.xTom A. R. Price, Amanda J. Bretman, Tomos D. Avent, Rhonda R. Snook, Gregory D. D. Hurst, Nina Wedell SEX RATIO DISTORTER REDUCES SPERM COMPETITIVE ABILITY IN AN INSECT, Evolution 62, no.77 (Jul 2008): 1644–1652.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00386.xL. D. BACIGALUPE, H. S. CRUDGINGTON, F. HUNTER, A. J. MOORE, R. R. SNOOK Sexual conflict does not drive reproductive isolation in experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, no.55 (Jul 2007): 1763–1771.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01389.xJEFFREY M. GOOD, CHARLES L. ROSS, THERESE A. MARKOW Multiple paternity in wild‐caught Drosophila mojavensis, Molecular Ecology 15, no.88 (Jun 2006): 2253–2260.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02847.x Helen S. Crudgington , Andrew P. Beckerman , Lena Brüstle , Kathleen Green , and Rhonda R. Snook Experimental Removal and Elevation of Sexual Selection: Does Sexual Selection Generate Manipulative Males and Resistant Females? H. S. Crudgington et al., The American Naturalist 165, no.S5S5 (Jul 2015): S72–S87.https://doi.org/10.1086/429353R. R. Snook, A. Robertson, H. S. Crudgington, M. G. Ritchie Experimental Manipulation of Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Courtship Song in Drosophila pseudoobscura, Behavior Genetics 35, no.33 (May 2005): 245–255.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-005-3217-0THIERRY GOSSELIN, BERNARD SAINTE‐MARIE, LOUIS BERNATCHEZ Geographic variation of multiple paternity in the American lobster, Homarus americanus, Molecular Ecology 14, no.55 (Mar 2005): 1517–1525.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02498.xAdam G. Jones, William R. Ardren Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations, Molecular Ecology 12, no.1010 (Sep 2003): 2511–2523.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01928.xPatricia Adair Gowaty, Rebecca Steinichen, Wyatt W. Anderson INDISCRIMINATE FEMALES AND CHOOSY MALES: WITHIN- AND BETWEEN-SPECIES VARIATION IN DROSOPHILA, Evolution 57, no.99 (Sep 2003): 2037–2045.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00383.xPaul D. Mack, Nicholas K. Priest, Daniel E. L. Promislow Female age and sperm competition: last-male precedence declines as female age increases, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270, no.15111511 (Jan 2003): 159–165.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2214Rhonda R. Snook, Therese Ann Markow Efficiency of gamete usage in nature: sperm storage, fertilization and polyspermy, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269, no.14901490 (Mar 2002): 467–473.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1854Mohamed A. F. Noor, Marta Pascual, Kelley R. Smith GENETIC VARIATION IN THE SPREAD OF DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA FROM A NONEQUILIBRIUM POPULATION, Evolution 54, no.22 (Jan 2000): 696.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0696:GVITSO]2.0.CO;2B. N. Singh, S. R. Singh Female remating inDrosophila ananassae: shorter duration of copulation during second mating as compared to first mating, Journal of Biosciences 24, no.44 (Dec 1999): 427–431.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02942652Lawrence G. Harshman, Andrew G. Clark INFERENCE OF SPERM COMPETITION FROM BROODS OF FIELD‐CAUGHT DROSOPHILA, Evolution 52, no.55 (May 2017): 1334–1341.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb02015.xTamito Sakurai Efficiency of sperm use for fertilization and the pattern of sperm decrease in the female sperm storage organ of the bean bug, Riptortus clavatus Thunberg (Heteroptera : Alydidae), Applied Entomology and Zoology 33, no.33 (Jan 1998): 363–368.https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.33.363 Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster : an interaction between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 263, no.13711371 (Jan 1997): 755–759.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0113Andrew T. Beckenbach SELECTION AND THE "SEX-RATIO" POLYMORPHISM IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA, Evolution 50, no.22 (May 2017): 787–794.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03888.xJorge E Quezada-Díaz, Mauro Santos, Alfredo Ruiz, Antonio Fontdevila The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XXV. Random mating in nature, Heredity 68, no.44 (Apr 1992): 373–379.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1992.53Terry Burke DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4, no.55 (May 1989): 139–144.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(89)90213-9Eric C. Toolson, Rebecca Kuper‐Simbrón LABORATORY EVOLUTION OF EPICUTICULAR HYDROCARBON COMPOSITION AND CUTICULAR PERMEABILITY IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA : EFFECTS ON SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND THERMAL‐ACCLIMATION ABILITY, Evolution 43, no.22 (May 2017): 468–473.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04242.x R. W. Marks , R. D. Seager , and L. G. Barr Local Ecology and Multiple Mating in a Natural Population of Drosophila melanogaster, The American Naturalist 131, no.66 (Oct 2015): 918–923.https://doi.org/10.1086/284832 L. Levine , O. Olvera , R. F. Rockwell , M. E. de la Rosa , E. Akin , M. I. Gaso , F. Gonzalez , and J. Guzman Chromosomal and Behavioral Studies of Mexican Drosophila. V. Frequencies of Multiple Insemination in Three Natural Populations, The American Naturalist 129, no.33 (Oct 2015): 458–462.https://doi.org/10.1086/284650Robert I. Bertin Consequences of mixed pollinations in Campsis radicans, Oecologia 70, no.11 (Aug 1986): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377104Scott M. Williams, Curtis Strobeck MEASURING THE MULTIPLE INSEMINATION FREQUENCY OF DROSOPHILA IN NATURE: USE OF A Y -LINKED MOLECULAR MARKER, Evolution 40, no.22 (May 2017): 440–442.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00489.xP.A. Parsons, A.A. Hoffmann ECOBEHAVIORAL GENETICS: HABITAT PREFERENCE IN DROSOPHILA, (Jan 1986): 535–559.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-398760-0.50027-4 Diane L. Marshall , and Norman C. Ellstrand Proximal Causes of Multiple Paternity in Wild Radish, Raphanus sativus, The American Naturalist 126, no.55 (Oct 2015): 596–605.https://doi.org/10.1086/284441P A Parsons, A A Hoffmann Habitat marking: Parallel genetic divergence in two Drosophila species, Heredity 54, no.22 (Apr 1985): 203–207.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1985.27 Ethan Akin , Howard Levene , Louis Levine , and Robert Rockwell A Conservative Procedure for the Estimation of Multiple Insemination in Drosophila, The American Naturalist 124, no.55 (Oct 2015): 723–737.https://doi.org/10.1086/284309P. A. Gowaty, A. A. Karlin Multiple maternity and paternity in single broods of apparently monogamous eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15, no.22 (Jul 1984): 91–95.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299374 Norman C. Ellstrand Multiple Paternity within the Fruits of the Wild Radish, Raphanus sativus, The American Naturalist 123, no.66 (Oct 2015): 819–828.https://doi.org/10.1086/284241Mark H. Gromko, Pamela D. Gerhart INCREASED DENSITY DOES NOT INCREASE REMATING FREQUENCY IN LABORATORY POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER, Evolution 38, no.22 (May 2017): 451–455.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00305.xMARK H. GROMKO, DONALD G. GILBERT, ROLLIN C. RICHMOND Sperm Transfer and Use in the Multiple Mating System of Drosophila, (Jan 1984): 371–426.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-652570-0.50017-8Monte E. Turner, Wyatt W. Anderson MULTIPLE MATING AND FEMALE FITNESS IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA, Evolution 37, no.44 (May 2017): 714–723.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1983.tb05593.x Louis Levine Observed Frequencies of Multiply Inseminated Drosophila pseudoobscura Females in Natural Populations: A Note of Caution and Explanation, The American Naturalist 120, no.33 (Oct 2015): 420–421.https://doi.org/10.1086/284002R. C. Griffiths, S. W. McKechnie, J. A. McKenzie Multiple mating and sperm displacement in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster, Theoretical and Applied Genetics 62, no.11 (Mar 1982): 89–96.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00276292D. B. Meringolo, R. Silibovsky, L. Ehrman Reproductive Advantages in Sequential Drosophila Pseudoobscura Matings, (Jan 1982): 399–405.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8321-9_35Stephen H. Bryant, Andrew T. Beckenbach, Gary A. Cobbs "SEX-RATIO" TRAIT, SEX COMPOSITION, AND RELATIVE ABUNDANCE IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA, Evolution 36, no.11 (Jun 2017): 27–34.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05006.xM. Loukas, V. Vergini, C. B. Krimbas The genetics of Drosophila subobscura populations XVIII. Multiple insemination and sperm displacement in Drosophila subobscura, Genetica 57, no.11 (Nov 1981): 29–37.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057540F. Terry Baldwin, Edwin H. Bryant EFFECT OF SIZE UPON MATING PERFORMANCE WITHIN GEOGRAPHIC STRAINS OF THE HOUSEFLY, MUSCA DOMESTICA L., Evolution 35, no.66 (May 2017): 1134–1141.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1981.tb04984.x Anita Pruzan-Hotchkiss , Denise DeJianne , and Scott H. Faro Sperm Utilization in Once- and Twice-Mated Drosophila pseudoobscura Females, The American Naturalist 118, no.11 (Oct 2015): 37–45.https://doi.org/10.1086/283799James Hanken, Paul W. Sherman Multiple Paternity in Belding's Ground Squirrel Litters, Science 212, no.44924492 (Apr 1981): 351–353.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7209536Andrew Beckenbach MULTIPLE MATING AND THE "SEX-RATIO" TRAIT IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA, Evolution 35, no.22 (May 2017): 275–281.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1981.tb04886.x Donald W. Pyle , and Mark H. Gromko Genetic Basis for Repeated Mating in Drosophila melanogaster, The American Naturalist 117, no.22 (Oct 2015): 133–146.https://doi.org/10.1086/283694 L. Levine , M. Asmussen , O. Olvera , J. R. Powell , M. E. de la Rosa , V. M. Salceda , M. I. Gaso , J. Guzman , and W. W. Anderson Population Genetics of Mexican Drosophila. V. A High Rate of Multiple Insemination in a Natural Population of Drosophila pseudoobscura, The American Naturalist 116, no.44 (Oct 2015): 493–503.https://doi.org/10.1086/283644J. A. McKenzie, J. C. Fegent Mating patterns of virgin and inseminatedDrosophila melanogaster of different alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh) genotypes, Experientia 36, no.1010 (Oct 1980): 1160–1161.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01976099C Petit, P Bourgeron, H Mercot Multiple matings effective population size and sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster, Heredity 45, no.22 (Oct 1980): 281–292.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1980.68Joan D. S. Darling, Martha L. Noble, Evelyn Shaw REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN THE SURFPERCHES. I. MULTIPLE INSEMINATION IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF THE SHINER PERCH, CYMATOGASTER AGGREGATA, Evolution 34, no.22 (May 2017): 271–277.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1980.tb04815.x David Policansky Fertility Differences as a Factor in the Maintenance of the "Sex Ratio" Polymorphism in Drosophila pseudoobscura, The American Naturalist 114, no.55 (Oct 2015): 672–680.https://doi.org/10.1086/283515 Paul W. Sherman Insect Chromosome Numbers and Eusociality, The American Naturalist 113, no.66 (Oct 2015): 925–935.https://doi.org/10.1086/283445Clay Sassaman Mating systems in porcellionid isopods: multiple paternity and sperm mixing in Porcellio scaber latr., Heredity 41, no.33 (Dec 1978): 385–397.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1978.109 Jeffrey R. Powell , and Harry Wistrand The Effect of Heterogeneous Environments and a Competitor on Genetic Variation in Drosophila, The American Naturalist 112, no.987987 (Oct 2015): 935–947.https://doi.org/10.1086/283333D. W. Pyle, M. H. Gromko Repeated mating by femaleDrosophila melanogaster: The adaptive importance, Experientia 34, no.44 (Apr 1978): 449–450.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01935920 Andrew T. Beckenbach The "Sex-Ratio" Trait in Drosophila pseudoobscura: Fertility Relations of Males and Meiotic Drive, The American Naturalist 112, no.983983 (Oct 2015): 97–117.https://doi.org/10.1086/283255 Gary Cobbs Multiple Insemination and Male Sexual Selection in Natural Populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura, The American Naturalist 111, no.980980 (Oct 2015): 641–656.https://doi.org/10.1086/283197 Keith Nelson , and Dennis Hedgecock Electrophoretic Evidence of Multiple Paternity in the Lobster Homarus americanus (Milne-Edwards), The American Naturalist 111, no.978978 (Oct 2015): 361–365.https://doi.org/10.1086/283165P.A. Parsons Genes, Behavior, and Evolutionary Processes: The Genus Drosophila, (Jan 1977): 1–32.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60244-8Anita Pruzan EFFECTS OF AGE, REARING AND MATING EXPERIENCES ON FREQUENCY DEPENDENT SEXUAL SELECTION IN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA, Evolution 30, no.11 (May 2017): 130–145.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1976.tb00890.xR. B. Merritt and B. J. Wu ON THE QUANTIFICATION OF PROMISCUITY (OR "PROMYSCUS" MANICULATUS ?), Evolution 29, no.33 (May 2017): 575–578.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1975.tb00847.x