Title: A Family Psychoeducation Group Program for Chinese People With Schizophrenia in Hong Kong
Abstract: Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Brief ReportFull AccessA Family Psychoeducation Group Program for Chinese People With Schizophrenia in Hong KongWai Tong Chien Ph.D., M.Phil.Ka-Fai Wong M.N., B.N.Wai Tong Chien Ph.D., M.Phil.Ka-Fai Wong M.N., B.N.Published Online:1 Jul 2007AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail As the trend moves toward community care, more than 50% of people with schizophrenia live with or depend on the care and assistance of their families ( 1 ). In such cases, the entire family may have to carry a heavy burden and undergo emotional distress in caring for the relative with schizophrenia. Recognizing the stress that such care imposes on family members, recent studies in the United States and the United Kingdom have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of a few models of family intervention, such as the family psychoeducation program and behavioral family management ( 2 , 3 ). The results of controlled trials that have examined the effectiveness of psychoeducational or behavioral models have been inconsistent and inconclusive, apart from showing improvements in the relapse rate and medication compliance of patients ( 3 , 4 ). In addition, most family intervention studies have focused only on Caucasian populations ( 2 , 4 ). Only a few studies have been carried out with Chinese or Asian populations, in which great importance is attached to intimate interpersonal relationships and interactions with family members ( 5 , 6 ). Thus little is known about whether existing models of family intervention can be applied successfully to a Chinese family-oriented culture. In an attempt to address the specific educational needs of Chinese families, a new needs-based educational treatment model for schizophrenia, the family psychoeducation group program, has been developed. This program was developed on the basis of the results of a controlled trial of a family psychoeducation group intervention in Hong Kong ( 1 ). The study results highlighted the importance of a family needs assessment, the encouragement of peer support between participants, and adequate staff training and ongoing supervision for program operation—all of which became integral parts of the psychoeducation program that was evaluated in the study presented here. The pilot study presented here was conducted to evaluate the effects of the psychoeducation group program on families of Chinese patients with schizophrenia recruited from two outpatient clinics in Hong Kong. It considered the program's effects on improvements in families' burden of care and functioning and on patients' functioning, symptoms, and rehospitalization rates, compared with changes among those who received standard care alone.Methods The study was a randomized controlled trial that used a repeated-measures design. It was undertaken between January 2004 and December 2005 and was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong and the outpatient clinic. A total of 200 Chinese family members who were caring for a relative with schizophrenia who attended one of the two regional outpatient clinics were eligible for the study; the 200 relatives with schizophrenia were also eligible for the study. The 200 relatives with schizophrenia made up 5% of the outpatients with schizophrenia in Hong Kong. Of these 200 family members, 150 of them (75%) agreed to participate. Of these, 84 (56%) were randomly selected to take part in this study. On the basis of previous studies of family psychoeducation groups among Chinese populations ( 6 , 7 ), this sample size was required to detect any significant difference between the groups at a 5% significance level with a power of 80% ( 8 ), taking into account potential attrition of 20%. Family members were eligible to participate in this study if they were at least 18 years old, were free from any psychiatric disorder, and lived with and cared for a relative who at recruitment had a primary diagnosis of schizophrenia according to DSM-IV criteria. Family members were excluded if they cared for more than one relative with a chronic mental or physical illness, because they may have had different varieties and levels of demands regarding caring for the patients, which might not have been addressed by the psychoeducation program. After written consent had been obtained from the family members and their relatives with schizophrenia and after a full explanation of the study, they were randomly assigned to the standard care group (routine psychiatric outpatient and family services only) or to the psychoeducation group (participation in the family psychoeducation group program plus usual care). Patients also participated in parts of the psychoeducation program, such as the six educational sessions on the mental illness and its symptoms and the effects of medications. The psychoeducation group program consisted of 18 sessions; each session met every other week and lasted about two hours. The treatment program consisted of four stages that were based on the work of McFarlane ( 3 ): orientation and engagement (three sessions), educational workshop (six sessions), therapeutic family role and strength rebuilding (seven sessions), and termination (two sessions). Patients participated in the six sessions of educational workshop. The program content was selected on the basis of the results of a needs assessment of 180 family members of Chinese persons with schizophrenia ( 9 ). The program used a culturally sensitive family intervention model, which considered many of the cultural tenets that were taught by Confucius (for example, valuing collectivism over individualism and giving great importance during the needs assessment to family and kinship ties) in respect to family relationships and value orientation. The group instructor was a registered psychiatric nurse who was trained in a three-day workshop that was held by a family therapist and the researchers. The instructor was provided with information about schizophrenia, the necessary skills to lead a family group, practice in leading a few sessions of a family education group and discussion after each session, and ongoing supervision meetings about the videotaped group sessions over the period of intervention. Care in the standard care group involved routine psychiatric outpatient and family services only (which were also provided to the psychoeducation group). These services consisted of monthly medical consultation and advice; individual nursing advice on community health care services; brief family education (two or three one-hour group sessions) on the patient's illness, medication, and treatment plan; and counseling provided by clinical psychologists if necessary. The two study groups did not differ in sociodemographic characteristics, medication types and dosages, or baseline measurement scores, according to the Student's t test or the chi square test. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was performed for the outcome variables to determine the treatment effects (group × time), followed by post-hoc Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) analysis. One researcher, who was blinded to the participant allocation, administered the pretest before randomization and two posttests at one week and 12 months after completion of the intervention. Family functioning and burden of care were rated with the Family Assessment Device ( 10 ) and the Family Burden Interview Schedule ( 11 ), respectively. The symptoms and psychosocial functioning of the patients were assessed with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale ( 12 ) and the Specific Level of Functioning Scale ( 13 ), respectively. The Chinese versions of these instruments were validated among Chinese patients with schizophrenia, indicating satisfactory reliability and validity ( 14 ). The patients' average number and length of rehospitalizations in the previous six months were calculated at the pre- and posttests. Data were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis. ResultsFifty-six of the 84 family members in this study were female (67%). Twenty-six (31%) family members were parents, and 25 (30%) were spouses. The mean age of the family members was 40.6±7.2 years (range=22–60), and 42 of them (50%) had completed secondary school or above. Their average monthly household income was H.K. $12,200 (U.S. $1,565). Fifty-one of the 84 patients were male (61%), and 50 of them (59%) had completed secondary school or above. The mean age of the patients was 28.8±4.8 years (range=20–49). Forty-eight family members (57%) had relatives who were taking second-generation neuroleptics (for example, clozapine and olanzapine). The average duration of the patients' illness was 3.6±1.8 years at recruitment (range=1–7). Forty-two participants were randomly assigned to the psychoeducation group, and 42 were assigned to the standard care group. Thirty-nine of the participants in the psychoeducation group (93%) completed the program, and four participants in the control group (10%) dropped out during the posttest period. There was a statistically significant difference between the two study groups on the combined dependent variables (F=4.89, df=5 and 80, p=.005; Wilks λ =.98, partial η2 =.18). The mean scores and standard deviations and the results of a repeated-measures MANOVA for the dependent variables are shown in Table 1 . The results indicate that there were statistically significant differences over the follow-up period between the groups in improvement in family functioning and burden of care, patient functioning, and number and length of rehospitalizations in the past six months. The results of the Tukey's HSD test indicate that in the psychoeducation group family functioning and burden of care and number of patients' rehospitalizations improved significantly at the two follow-ups (one week and 12 months after completion of the intervention) but that patients' functioning and length of rehospitalizations in this program improved significantly only at the second follow-up. Table 1 Results of a multivariate analysis of variance of scores on key measures among 84 family members of Chinese patients with schizophrenia assigned to an intervention or usual care groupTable 1 Results of a multivariate analysis of variance of scores on key measures among 84 family members of Chinese patients with schizophrenia assigned to an intervention or usual care groupEnlarge tableDiscussion Similar to findings suggested in previous trials in Western countries ( 3 , 4 ), our findings demonstrate that providing a psychoeducation and supportive group intervention in a Chinese population in Hong Kong and addressing the specific cultural and family needs of persons who care for patients with schizophrenia (for example, strengthening the interdependence of family members in caregiving) may improve the psychosocial health condition of the entire family and their relative's risk of rehospitalization over a 12-month follow-up period. Nevertheless, as in previous studies of family group programs ( 2 , 3 , 4 ), it was too soon at one week after completion of the intervention to expect significant changes in patients' functioning and rehospitalization. Follow-up at one year or more would be required to identify the significant longer-term effects of a family psychosocial intervention. Because mental illness was a matter of great concern to most of the family members, it is noteworthy that they reported a significant improvement in their caregiving burden and functioning (such as communication with and attitude toward the patient). The reduced rehospitalization rates of the patients were probably due to better family support of patients' medication compliance and psychosocial functioning. In return, fewer patient relapses would likely result in better family functioning and health. The significant positive results of the family psychoeducation program also demonstrate the need to consider such aspects as family needs assessment, staff training and continuous supervision, and peer support between family participants in the preparation and implementation processes. These components should be tested separately to confirm whether any of them would be an important factor for successful dissemination of family intervention, as suggested by previous studies ( 1 , 3 , 15 ). The small size of the study group, however, limits analysis of the mediating variables to identify the therapeutic mechanisms of the psychoeducation group program. These mechanisms may have accounted for the improvements in the functioning of both the patients and the families who are involved in family-centered care for schizophrenia. Future research could use a larger sample, which would permit a deeper exploration of the relationships among the perceived benefits, the mechanisms of change, and the intervention techniques that are applied in a family psychoeducation group program.ConclusionsThis study supports the family psychoeducation group intervention to be an effective community-based intervention for family members of Chinese people with schizophrenia in Hong Kong, compared with routine psychiatric outpatient care. The small sample of Chinese families was recruited from two outpatient clinics in one geographical region. The group intervention was limited to nine months and no booster session was offered. These findings warrant further evaluation of this type of intervention and its therapeutic mechanisms and a comparison with other models of family intervention with larger representative samples of diverse sociocultural backgrounds and comorbidity of other mental problems.Acknowledgments and disclosuresThis research was supported by grant 2004-05 from the Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. The authors thank the outpatient clinic and its staff for their assistance in the recruitment of participants and data collection.The authors report no competing interests.Dr. Chien is with the Nethersole School of Nursing, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 7/F, Esther Lee Building, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong (e-mail: [email protected]). Mr. Wong is with the Department of Nursing, School of Science and Technology, Open University of Hong Kong, Kowloon.References1. Chien WT, Chan SWC, Thompson DR: Effects of a mutual support group for families of Chinese people with schizophrenia: 18-month follow-up. British Journal of Psychiatry 189:41–49, 2006Google Scholar2. Pharoah FM, Mari JJ, Streiner D: Family intervention for schizophrenia, in Cochrane Systematic Reviews, Issue 3, 2001. Oxford, Cochrane Library, 2001Google Scholar3. McFarlane WR: Multifamily Groups in the Treatment of Severe Psychiatric Disorders. New York, Guilford, 2002Google Scholar4. Magliano L, Fiorillo A, Fadden G, et al: Effectiveness of a psychoeducational intervention for families of patients with schizophrenia: results of a study funded by the European Commission. World Psychiatry 4:45–49, 2005Google Scholar5. Li Z, Arthur D: Family education for people with schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry 187:339–345, 2005Google Scholar6. Li Z, Arthur D: Family education for people with schizophrenia in Beijing, China: randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 187:339–345, 2005Google Scholar7. Xiong MG, Ran MS, Li SG, et al: A controlled evaluation of psychoeducational family intervention in a rural Chinese community. British Journal of Psychiatry 165:239–247, 1994Google Scholar8. Cohen J: A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112:155–159, 1992Google Scholar9. Chien WT, Norman I: Educational needs of families caring for Chinese patients with schizophrenia. Journal of Advanced Nursing 44:490–498, 2003Google Scholar10. Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS: The McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 9:171–180, 1983Google Scholar11. Pai S, Kapur RL: The burden on the family of a psychiatric patient: development of an interview schedule. British Journal of Psychiatry 138:332–335, 1981Google Scholar12. Overall JE, Gorham DR: The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychiatric Reports 10:799–812, 1962Google Scholar13. Schneider LC, Struening EL: SLOF: A behavioral rating scale for assessing the mentally ill. Social Work Research 19:9–21, 1983Google Scholar14. Chien WT, Chan SWC: One-year follow-up of a multiple-family-group intervention for Chinese families of patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services 55:1276–1284, 2004Google Scholar15. Magliano L, Fiorillo A, Malangone C, et al: Implementing psychoeducational interventions in Italy for patients with schizophrenia and their families. Psychiatric Services 57:266–269, 2006Google Scholar FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited ByPsychoeducation as Precision Health in Military-Related Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 103, No. 6A 1-Day Training Course to Disseminate the BREF Psychoeducational Program to Caregivers and Promote Network Establishment between Psychiatry Departments and Family Associations26 April 2022 | Academic Psychiatry, Vol. 55Multi-Family Therapy for First Episode Psychosis: Experiences of Families in Singapore24 December 2021 | Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 12Family involvement moderates the relationship between perceived recovery orientation of services and personal narratives among Chinese with schizophrenia in Hong Kong: a 1-year longitudinal investigation14 August 2020 | Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, Vol. 56, No. 3Development of Multi‐Family Therapy for First Episode Psychosis in Singapore3 February 2021 | Journal of Family Therapy, Vol. 19Terapia psicoeducativa para familias de pacientes con esquizofrenia paranoideEnfermería Clínica (English Edition), Vol. 30, No. 5Terapia psicoeducativa para familias de pacientes con esquizofrenia paranoideEnfermería Clínica, Vol. 30, No. 5Outside-in or Inside-out? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Empowerment Approaches for Family Caregivers of People with Schizophrenia4 June 2020 | Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 41, No. 9Effectiveness of Family Intervention for Preventing Relapse in First-Episode Psychosis Until 24 Months of Follow-up: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials3 May 2019 | Schizophrenia Bulletin, Vol. 46, No. 1Service evaluation of a sole-session psychoeducational intervention to improve caregivers' key illness beliefs after first episode psychosis (FEP)28 July 2020 | The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, Vol. 13Review of Group Family Psychoeducation for Schizophrenia and Recommendation of Program Applicable to Korean SituationJournal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, Vol. 59, No. 3Psychological Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 6Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 40, No. 6Internal Medicine Journal, Vol. 49Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 26, No. 9-10Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 10Evaluating the effectiveness of a culturally adapted behavioral family psycho-educational program for Egyptian patients with schizophrenia3 July 2018 | Transcultural Psychiatry, Vol. 55, No. 5Using 'WeChat' online social networking in a real-world needs analysis of family members of youths at clinical high risk of psychosis6 June 2017 | Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 52, No. 4Early Intervention in Psychiatry, Vol. 12, No. 4Health Services and Delivery Research, Vol. 6, No. 32Psychosocial Intervention, Vol. 27, No. 3A Handbook for the Study of Mental Health28 May 2018 | , Vol. 56Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, Vol. 24, No. 4Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 56Recommendations for the optimal care of patients with recent‐onset psychosis in the A sia‐ P acific region8 April 2016 | Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, Vol. 8, No. 2Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique, Vol. 174, No. 8A randomized trial to assess the efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention on caregiver burden in schizophrenia23 March 2020 | European Psychiatry, Vol. 33, No. 1La Presse Médicale, Vol. 45, No. 9Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 37, No. 11Family Process, Vol. 55, No. 3Psychoeducation for siblings of people with severe mental illness8 May 2015 | Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. 58First Adaptation of a Family-Based ACT Model in Mainland China: A Pilot ProjectWei Zhao, M.Psy., Samuel Law, M.D., Xingwei Luo, M.D., Ph.D., Wendy Chow, M.S.W., Jinqiang Zhang, M.P.A., Ye Zhu, M.Psy., Shiyan Liu, M.Psy., Xiaoqian Ma, M.Psy., Shuqiao Yao, M.D., Ph.D., Xiang Wang, M.D., Ph.D.2 January 2015 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 66, No. 4Psychiatry Research, Vol. 229, No. 1-2Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, Vol. 44, No. 3Family Process, Vol. 54, No. 1British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 206, No. 4Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, Vol. 25, No. 4The effects of group psychoeducational programme on family burden in caregivers of Iranian patients with schizophrenia26 August 2013 | Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 21, No. 5Tratamiento con intervenciones psicosociales en la fase aguda y de mantenimiento del paciente adulto con diagnóstico de esquizofreniaRevista Colombiana de Psiquiatría, Vol. 44Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience, Vol. 12, No. 2An RCT With Three-Year Follow-Up of Peer Support Groups for Chinese Families of Persons With SchizophreniaWai Tong Chien, Ph.D., B.N., and David R. Thompson, Ph.D., M.Sc.1 October 2013 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 64, No. 10The Influence of Perceived Social Support on Medication Adherence in First-Episode Psychosis1 January 2013 | The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 58, No. 1International Review of Psychiatry, Vol. 24, No. 2Psychoeducation for schizophrenia15 June 2011 | Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Vol. 3Family Therapy for Schizophrenia in the South African Context: Challenges and Pathways to Implementation1 June 2011 | South African Journal of Psychology, Vol. 41, No. 2Psychoedukation5 May 2011 | Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie up2date, Vol. 5, No. 03Journal of Psychology in Africa, Vol. 21, No. 2The Schizophrenia Care Management Program for Family Caregivers of Chinese Patients With SchizophreniaWai Tong Chien, Ph.D., R.M.N.Isabella Y. M. Lee, M.Phil., R.N.1 March 2010 | Psychiatric Services, Vol. 61, No. 3Research on Caregiving in Chinese Families Living With Mental Illness: A Critical Review9 February 2010 | Journal of Family Nursing, Vol. 16, No. 1Psychological Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 1Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol. 122, No. 6Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, Vol. 2, No. 2Testing the psychometric properties of a Chinese version of the Level of Expressed Emotion scale17 September 2008 | Research in Nursing & Health, Vol. 32, No. 1Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 3Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol. 119, No. 6PLoS Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 10Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Vol. 21, No. 2Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, Vol. 8, No. 7 Volume 58Issue 7 July, 2007Pages 1003-1006PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES July 2007 Volume 58 Number 7 Metrics PDF download History Published online 1 July 2007 Published in print 1 July 2007
Publication Year: 2007
Publication Date: 2007-07-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 20
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot