Abstract: The articles and book reviews in this issue draw some interesting connections between religious faith and the moral life, especially as these connections bear on the thought of Kant and Kierkegaard.The lead article by Elizabeth Drummond Young explores the moral life of God and raises the question of whether God has moral obligations.Young discusses Alston's thesis that the source of God's goodness is not found in moral obligation but in supererogation.Alston claims it would diminish God's moral perfection to think of divine action as stemming from moral obligations since this would entail (as in a usual interpretation of Kant) that God must go against the grain of inclination.Agreeing with this, critics of Alston's position have nevertheless claimed that divine actions cannot be motivated by supererogation, since it makes no sense to say that God goes beyond moral obligation if moral obligation (for God) does not exist.Young attempts to rescue Alston's position from this criticism by founding supererogation in love, or more precisely in a revised moral notion of it, rather than in duty.Our second essay by Paolo Diego Bubbio, turns explicitly to Kant.The topic is sacrifice and the paradigm of this for Kant is Christ.Bubbio notes that there is some tension in Kant's view of sacrifice.On the one hand, Kant does not find the biblical story of the sacrifice of Isaac morally acceptable, since it makes precisely the move that Kierkegaard seems to make, namely, the move of ranking religious faith higher than morality.As well, Kant registers his puzzlement as to how a morally perfect God could sacrifice any of his perfection.But on the other hand, and even though reason cannot fully understand it, Kant finds in the Christ figure the perfect model for moral perfection, something that was shown in his ultimate sacrifice out of love for the world.Perhaps the tension here was generated by Kant's attempt to combine