Title: Using the Principles of NEPA in Long-Range Planning to Improve Transportation Decision-Making
Abstract: The Bay-Lake Regional Planning Commission’s Northside Traffic Circulation Study final report evolved out of a controversy in the northern fringe of the City of Sheboygan and adjacent portions of the Town of Sheboygan, Wisconsin. Wilbur Smith Associates was contracted in 1999 to undertake an 18-month study to recommend the most efficient and effective thoroughfare plan for the region. Almost immediately several basic tenets of the standard transportation planning process were challenged. Three years later the project was completed, albeit with a much different scope. From the initial steering committee meeting non-technical study members criticized the limits of the scope of the project. They rejected the notion that social, economic, and ecological (SEE) impacts would be investigated during later phases of project development. It was their opinion that good investment decisions, even long-term ones, could only be made when as many of the overall positive and negative impacts as possible were known beforehand. While a complete National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis was beyond the resources (and requirements) of the funding agencies, adjustments in both the scope and budget were eventually made. After a change in project staffing to bring in environmental impact staff, what evolved was a blend of traditional long-range planning and order of magnitude NEPA-type evaluation of SEE impacts. Additional transportation goals and objectives were developed by the Steering Committee, along with supporting policies. These goals and objectives were used to evaluate the alternatives. Supplementary data gathering, accompanied by an expansion of the study area to become more inclusive of SEE resources, also occurred. Membership of the final Steering Committee included the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WisDNR), the Local Chapter of the Audubon Society, and several other stakeholders. The representative from WisDNR provided detailed data about wetlands and federal and state Endangered, Threatened, and Species of Concern that are known to occur or have habitat in the project area. Detailed water quality, air quality, hazardous materials, cultural and historic resource, and floodplain information were also gathered from existing sources. After great initial controversy about not considering SEE factors in planning transportation facilities, this process produced recommendations that some disagreed with, but all acknowledged were inclusive, fair and, by providing decision-makers with the likely consequences of each segment, led to more informed decision-making.
Publication Year: 2004
Publication Date: 2004-01-01
Language: en
Type: article
Access and Citation
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot