Title: Assessing the Value of General Education Programs: The Addition of Meaning-Making to the E-Value-Ation Process
Abstract: Introduction: Its Meaning is Its Value Evaluating program without an attempt to develop an understanding of underlying processes and functions is like drinking from an empty bottle to satisfy thirst, vacuous and frustrating enterprise. Evaluation should not only be an attempt to quantitatively measure outcomes, but also process of meaning-making. Evaluation has been described as, a meaning-making technology which is applied to curriculum, instruction and learning (Hill, 1997, p. 4) in educational institutions. The term meaning, however, is an abstract concept that needs to be defined and broken down into more specific components if it is to be applied to practical evaluation process that requires specificity for success. So then, what is meaning? In Plato's view, the meaning of world is its (Hartman, 1967, p. 49). Still, if meaning is defined as value, then more precise idea of value that is so much part of e-valu-ation is necessary. Hartman (1967) by offering logic of value in his book, The Structure of Value: Foundations of Scientific Axiology, provided general definition of value together with description of specific types of values. The purpose of this article is to, first, define value in general, secondly, describe Hartman's value dimensions including extrinsic, systemic and intrinsic and thirdly, discuss their significance in relation to answering evaluation question, Is this college or university's general education program valuable? To Have and to Have Not How can an individual decide whether or not someone or something has value? According to Hartman (1967, Presno & Presno, 1980), value is fulfillment of thing by its concept. In other words, when thing matches person's concept or idea of it, thing is thought to be worthy, exceptional, valid and good. By contrast, thing that does not fulfill its concept or definition is considered not valuable, inferior, inadequate, wrong, deleterious, or just plain bad. So, in determining value of general education program, it is necessary to compare and contrast whether specific instances such as those under categories of institutional practices and student outcomes correspond to chosen concept of general education. In order to find out if general education is valuable at particular institution, actual program as it exists must be compared to concepts of general education held by involved members which include faculty, staff, administrators, students, community and state and federal government. The Value Dimensions In order to further dissect concept of value, Hartman (1967) discussed it in terms of three categories or dimensions: Extrinsic, systemic and intrinsic. It is important to note that each of these three dimensions may be applied to single person including self, to group of people or to things like an institution or program. The following are descriptions of three types of valuing. Extrinsic If it's practical, it has extrinsic value. Hartman (1967) defined extrinsic value as thing fulfilling an abstract concept or class concept. In class, each thing shares common properties with all other things so something that is considered or valuable would be part of class community and correspond to mutual characteristics (Presno & Presno, 1980). Thus, good faculty member would be one that adheres to class of faculty members that generally includes aspects of teaching, research and community service. A faculty member who meets these criteria not only stands chance of getting tenure, but also has extrinsic or practical value. Conversely, thing that does not adequately represent its class lacks extrinsic value. The use of words and phrases such as excellent, four stars, two thumbs up, satisfactory or poor are cues of pragmatic thinking and that one is judging someone or something's practical value. …
Publication Year: 1998
Publication Date: 1998-06-22
Language: en
Type: article
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 1
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot