Title: Clinical effect of laparoscopic vs conventional open abdominal surgery in the treatment of colon cancer
Abstract: Objective
To explore the clinical effect of laparoscopic vs conventional open ab-dominal surgery in the treatment of colon cancer.
Methods
One hundred and twenty-six patients with colon cancer were divided into the study group and the control group, 63 cases in each group. Conventional open abdominal surgery was used to treat patients in the control group, and laparoscopic surgery was used in the study group. The surgery-related indicators (the operation time, intraoperative blood and the cleaning number of lymph node), postoperative recovery (exhaust time, bed-off time, liquid diet time, time stay in hospital and pain score at different postoperative time) and long-term survival of the two groups were compared.
Results
Intraoperative blood in the study group was less than the control group (P<0.05), the cleaning number of lymph node in the study group was more than the control group (P<0.05), the operation time difference of the two groups had no statistical significance. Postoperative recovery of the study group were all better than the control group (P<0.05). The long-term effect of the two groups had no statistical significance.
Conclusions
Compared with conventional open abdominal surgery in the treatment of colon cancer, laparoscopic surgery can reduce the intraoperative blood, increase the cleaning number of lymph node. It promotes the postoperative recovery, which can be widely used in clinical.
Key words:
Colonic neoplasms; Laparoscopes; Comparative effectiveness research
Publication Year: 2016
Publication Date: 2016-04-01
Language: en
Type: article
Access and Citation
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot