Title: A verdict of not guilty? A verdict of guilty? Or something third?
Abstract: The author posing the problem considers the situation when the judge is at the final stage of the criminal trial and there is insufficient evidence to convict as well as there are no grounds for acquitting the verdict, because the judge is not internally convinced that the defendant did not commit the act incriminated to him. Moreover, the author draws attention to the fact that the current criminal procedure legislation does not provide the justification by evidence that the accused is not guilty in the acquittal. At the same time, the law obliges the judge to have a lawful, reasonable and fair verdict, which cannot be achieved in the indicated situation. The recharacterization of the charges to a milder one, as well as the reduction of the verdict “to a mandatory minimum” and even “less than the statutory mandatory minimum” in such situation will not meet the principle of justice. However, the Code of Laws of the Russian Empire of 1857 provided such type of criminal verdict as “leaving under suspicion”, which was widely used in judicial practice. The author suggests returning to the three options types of verdicts filling the third type with the content relevant for present realities.
Publication Year: 2019
Publication Date: 2019-01-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot