Abstract:Semiotics, in – or as an approach to – communication studies has had mixed fortunes. On the one hand, it has been supposedly superseded by interpretational and more reader-centered research. On the ot...Semiotics, in – or as an approach to – communication studies has had mixed fortunes. On the one hand, it has been supposedly superseded by interpretational and more reader-centered research. On the other hand, it has lingered on as a perspective in which signs and texts have been taken as empirical phenomena that demand to be studied regardless, as well as an outlook that comprises nonverbal as well as verbal signification. Yet, in both cases, the kind of semiotics envisaged by communication and media studies is often a throwback to a fashionable heyday when superficial understandings of semiotics were standard in heavily-used textbooks (Dyer, 1982; Fiske, 1982; Hartley, 1982 etc.). The contribution on semiotics for the volume Reimagining Communication will review these traditional perspectives on semiotics localized in communication study but will mainly propose an emerging perspective for the field (Self, 2013). In particular, this contribution will outline the ways in which semiotics is a steadfast anti-psychologism characterized by its concern with the suprasubjectivity of the sign relation. It will be shown that this nevertheless comprises cognizance and incorporation of matters central to the communication process: interpretation and the vagaries of context. It will suggest that contemporary semiotics, with its perspective on communication across species and in machines, heralds new vistas for communication study beyond the realms of anthropocentrism.Read More
Publication Year: 2020
Publication Date: 2020-06-02
Language: en
Type: book-chapter
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 1
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot