Title: Review: The Printed and the Built: Architecture, Print Culture and Public Debate in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Mari Hvattum and Anne Hultzsch, and Plaster Monuments: Architecture and the Power of Reproduction, by Mari Lending
Abstract: Book Review| December 01 2019 Review: The Printed and the Built: Architecture, Print Culture and Public Debate in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Mari Hvattum and Anne Hultzsch, and Plaster Monuments: Architecture and the Power of Reproduction, by Mari Lending Mari Hvattum and Anne Hultzsch, eds. The Printed and the Built: Architecture, Print Culture and Public Debate in the Nineteenth CenturyLondon: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2018, 306 pp., 115 color illus. £75.00 (cloth), ISBN 9781350038417; £24.99 (paper), ISBN 9781350038400Mari LendingPlaster Monuments: Architecture and the Power of ReproductionPrinceton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2018, 284 pp., 48 color and 73 b/w illus. $49.95/£40 (cloth), ISBN 9780691177144 Can Bilsel Can Bilsel University of San Diego Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2019) 78 (4): 479–482. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2019.78.4.479 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Can Bilsel; Review: The Printed and the Built: Architecture, Print Culture and Public Debate in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Mari Hvattum and Anne Hultzsch, and Plaster Monuments: Architecture and the Power of Reproduction, by Mari Lending. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 December 2019; 78 (4): 479–482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2019.78.4.479 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search “For better or worse, all my figures are men and all my texts are canonical, but the men do not look so triumphant in retrospect, and today the canon appears less a barricade to storm than a ruin to pick through.” These lines, written by Hal Foster, appear in his 2002 article “Archives of Modern Art,” which traces major shifts in the memory structure of European art between 1850 and 1950. Rereading this history through a series of oppositions (Baudelaire/Manet, Valéry/Proust, Panofsky/Benjamin), Foster examines the “institutional relay” between the artist's studio and the space of the museum. Art in the nineteenth century was a “mnemonic elaboration” of earlier work. Yet this relation between the atelier and the museum was hardly a one-way street: Baudelaire's idea of artistic practice, for instance, “already presumes the space of the museum as the structure of its mnemonic effects.” Each theorist's position is reread through... You do not currently have access to this content.
Publication Year: 2019
Publication Date: 2019-12-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot