Title: Advanced therapies in wound management: cell and tissue based therapies, physical and bio-physical therapies smart and IT based technologies
Abstract: Journal of Wound CareVol. 27, No. Sup6a Advanced therapies in wound management: cell and tissue based therapies, physical and bio-physical therapies smart and IT based technologiesAlberto Piaggesi, Severin Låuchli, Franco Bassetto, Thomas Biedermann, Alexandra Marques, Bijan Najafi, Ilaria Palla, Carlotta Scarpa, Diane Seimetz, Isotta Triulzi, Giuseppe Turchetti, Annegret VaggelasAlberto PiaggesiSearch for more papers by this author, Severin LåuchliSearch for more papers by this author, Franco BassettoSearch for more papers by this author, Thomas BiedermannSearch for more papers by this author, Alexandra MarquesSearch for more papers by this author, Bijan NajafiSearch for more papers by this author, Ilaria PallaSearch for more papers by this author, Carlotta ScarpaSearch for more papers by this author, Diane SeimetzSearch for more papers by this author, Isotta TriulziSearch for more papers by this author, Giuseppe TurchettiSearch for more papers by this author, Annegret VaggelasSearch for more papers by this authorAlberto Piaggesi; Severin Låuchli; Franco Bassetto; Thomas Biedermann; Alexandra Marques; Bijan Najafi; Ilaria Palla; Carlotta Scarpa; Diane Seimetz; Isotta Triulzi; Giuseppe Turchetti; Annegret VaggelasPublished Online:14 Jun 2018https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2018.27.Sup6a.S1AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References 1 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al.. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336(7650):924–926. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2 Forrest RD. Early history of wound treatment. J R Soc Med 1982; 75(3):198–205 Medline, Google Scholar3 Shah JB. The history of wound care. J Am Col Certif Wound Spec 2011; 3(3):65–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcws.2012.04.002 Medline, Google Scholar4 Dhivya S, Padma VV, Santhini E. Wound dressings – a review. BioMedicine 2015; 5(4):22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7603/s40681-015-0022-9 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5 Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 1962; 193(4812):293–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/193293a0 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Broussard KC, Powers JG. Wound dressings: selecting the most appropriate type. Am J Clin Dermatol 2013; 14(6):449–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-013-0046-4 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar7 Mulder G, Jones R, Cederholm-Williams S et al.. Fibrin cuff lysis in chronic venous ulcers treated with a hydrocolloid dressing. Int J Dermatol 1993; 32(4):304–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4362.1993.tb04275.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar8 Han G, Ceilley R. Chronic Wound Healing: A Review of Current Management and Treatments. Adv Ther 2017; 34(3):599–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar9 Junker JP, Kamel RA, Caterson EJ, Eriksson E. Clinical Impact Upon Wound Healing and Inflammation in Moist, Wet, and Dry Environments. Adv Wound Care 2013; 2(7):348–356. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2012.0412 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Rippon M, Davies P, White R. Taking the trauma out of wound care: the importance of undisturbed healing. Journal of wound care. 2012;21(8):359-60, 62, 64-8. Link, Google Scholar11 Debels H, Hamdi M, Abberton K, Morrison W. Dermal matrices and bioengineered skin substitutes: a critical review of current options. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2015; 3(1):e284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000219 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Seymour J. On view: film dressing. Nurs Times 1996; 92(43):46–48 Google Scholar13 Lee SM, Park IK, Kim YS et al.. Physical, morphological, and wound healing properties of a polyurethane foam-film dressing. Biomaterials Research 2016; 20(1):15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0063-5 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Jones V, Grey JE, Harding KG. Wound dressings. BMJ 2006; 332(7544):777–780. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7544.777 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Cutting KF. Wound exudate: composition and functions. Br J Community Nurs 2003; 8(9 Suppl):suppl 4–9 Link, Google Scholar16 Madden MR, Nolan E, Finkelstein JL et al.. Comparison of an occlusive and a semi-occlusive dressing and the effect of the wound exudate upon keratinocyte proliferation. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 1989; 29(7):924–931. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198907000-00004 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar17 Amano S, Akutsu N, Ogura Y, Nishiyama T. Increase of laminin 5 synthesis in human keratinocytes by acute wound fluid, inflammatory cytokines and growth factors, and lysophospholipids. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151(5):961–970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06175.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar18 Aiba-Kojima E, Tsuno NH, Inoue K et al.. Characterization of wound drainage fluids as a source of soluble factors associated with wound healing: comparison with platelet-rich plasma and potential use in cell culture. Wound Repair Regen 2007; 15(4):511–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00259.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar19 Di Vita G, Patti R, D'Agostino P et al.. Cytokines and growth factors in wound drainage fluid from patients undergoing incisional hernia repair. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14(3):259–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00120.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar20 Widgerow AD, King K, Tocco-Tussardi I et al.. The burn wound exudate-an under-utilized resource. Burns 2015; 41(1):11–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2014.06.002 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Jonkman MF, Hoeksma EA, Nieuwenhuis P. Accelerated epithelization under a highly vapor-permeable wound dressing is associated with increased precipitation of fibrin(ogen) and fibronectin. J Invest Dermatol 1990; 94(4):477–484. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12874624 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Kubo M, Van De Water L, Plantefaber LC et al.. Fibrinogen and fibrin are anti-adhesive for keratinocytes: a mechanism for fibrin eschar slough during wound repair. J Invest Dermatol 2001;117(6):1369–1381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01551.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar23 Weckroth M, Vaheri A, Myohanen H et al.. Differential effects of acute and chronic wound fluids on urokinase-type plasminogen activator, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, and tissue-type plasminogen activator in cultured human keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Wound Repair Regen 2001; 9(4):314–322 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar24 Barrick B, Campbell EJ, Owen CA. Leukocyte proteinases in wound healing: roles in physiologic and pathologic processes. Wound Repair Regen 1999;7(6):410-22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.1999.00410.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar25 Nwomeh BC, Liang HX, Diegelmann RF et al.. Dynamics of the matrix metalloproteinases MMP-1 and MMP-8 in acute open human dermal wounds. Wound Repair Regen 1998;6(2):127–134 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Trengove NJ, Stacey MC, MacAuley S et al.. Analysis of the acute and chronic wound environments: the role of proteases and their inhibitors. Wound Repair Regen 1999; 7(6):442–452. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar27 Nissen NN, Gamelli RL, Polverini PJ, DiPietro LA. Differential angiogenic and proliferative activity of surgical and burn wound fluids. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 2003; 54(6):1205–1210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000061884.28845.5A Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Stephen-Haynes J, Callaghan R, Wibaux A et al.. Clinical evaluation of a thin absorbent skin adhesive dressing for wound management. J Wound Care 2014; 23(11):532, 4, 6 passim. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2014.23.11.532 Link, Google Scholar29 Salemark KP, Salemark L. How to dress donor sites of split thickness skin grafts: a prospective, randomised study of four dressings. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2000; 34(1):55–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310050160178 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar30 Kazanavičius M, Cepas A, Kolaityte V, Simoliuniene R, Rimdeika R. The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2017; 26(6):281–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.6.281 Link, Google Scholar31 Terrill PJ, Goh RC, Bailey MJ. Split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a comparative study of two absorbent dressings. J Wound Care 2007; 16(10):433–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2007.16.10.27912 Link, Google Scholar32 Brölmann FE, Eskes AM, Goslings JC et al.. Randomized clinical trial of donor-site wound dressings after split-skin grafting. Br J Surg 2013; 100(5):619–627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9045 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar33 Kaiser D, Hafner J, Mayer D et al.. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study. Adv Skin Wound Care 2013; 26(2):67–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000426715.57540.8d Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34 Kazanavičius M, Cepas A, Kolaityte V et al.. The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2017; 26(6):281–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.6.281 Link, Google Scholar35 Brenner M, Hilliard C, Peel G et al.. Management of pediatric skin-graft donor sites: a randomized controlled trial of three wound care products. J Burn Care Res 2015; 36(1):159–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000161 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar36 Higgins L, Wasiak J, Spinks A, Cleland H. Split-thickness skin graft donor site management: a randomized controlled trial comparing polyurethane with calcium alginate dressings. Int Wound J 2012; 9(2):126–131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00867.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar37 Karlsson M, Lindgren M, Jarnhed-Andersson I, Tarpila E. Dressing the split-thickness skin graft donor site: a randomized clinical trial. Adv Skin Wound Care 2014; 27(1):20–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000437786.92529.22 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar38 Brölmann FE, Eskes AM, Goslings JC et al.. Randomized clinical trial of donor-site wound dressings after split-skin grafting. Br J Surg 2013; 100(5):619–627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9045 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar39 Dornseifer U, Lonic D, Gerstung TI et al.. The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing: a clinical comparative trial of a modified polyurethane dressing and aquacel. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128(4):918–924. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268c02 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar40 Fernández-Castro M, Martín-Gil B, Peña-García I et al.. Effectiveness of semi-permeable dressings to treat radiation-induced skin reactions. A systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 26(6):e12685. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12685 Crossref, Google Scholar41 Sood A, Granick MS, Tomaselli NL. Wound Dressings and Comparative Effectiveness Data. Adv Wound Care 2014; 3(8):511–529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2012.0401 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar42 Bullough L, Johnson S, Forder R. Evaluation of a foam dressing for acute and chronic wound exudate management. Br J Community Nurs 2015; Suppl Wound Care: S17–S24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.Sup9.S17 Link, Google Scholar43 Zehrer CL, Holm D, Solfest SE, Walters SA. A comparison of the in vitro moisture vapour transmission rate and in vivo fluid-handling capacity of six adhesive foam dressings to a newly reformulated adhesive foam dressing. Int Wound J 2014; 11(6):681–690. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12030 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar44 Browning P, White RJ, Rowell T. Comparative evaluation of the functional properties of superabsorbent dressings and their effect on exudate management. J Wound Care 2016; 25(8):452–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2016.25.8.452 Link, Google Scholar45 McCarty SM, Percival SL, Clegg PD, Cochrane CA. The role of polyphosphates in the sequestration of matrix metalloproteinases. Int Wound J 2015 Feb;12(1):89–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12058 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar46 Wiegand C, White RJ. Binding and inhibition of protease enzymes, including MMPs, by a superabsorbent dressing in vitro. J Wound Care 2013;22(5):221–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2013.22.5.221 Link, Google Scholar47 Cullen B, Watt PW, Lundqvist C et al.. The role of oxidised regenerated cellulose/collagen in chronic wound repair and its potential mechanism of action. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2002; 34(12):1544–1556. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1357-2725(02)00054-7 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar48 Yamane T, Nakagami G, Yoshino S et al.. Hydrocellular foam dressings promote wound healing associated with decrease in inflammation in rat periwound skin and granulation tissue, compared with hydrocolloid dressings. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2015; 79(2):185–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09168451.2014.968088 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar49 Yamane T, Nakagami G, Yoshino S et al.. Hydrocellular foam dressing promotes wound healing along with increases in hyaluronan synthase 3 and PPARa gene expression in epidermis. PLoS One 2013; 8(8):e73988. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073988 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar50 Yoshino S, Nakagami G, Ohira T et al.. Hydrocellular foam dressing increases the leptin level in wound fluid. Wound Repair Regen 2015; 23(5):703–710. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12349 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar51 Bateman SD. 150 patient experiences with a soft silicone foam dressing. Br J Nurs 2015; 24(12):S16–S23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2015.24.Sup12.S16 Link, Google Scholar52 Brenner M, Hilliard C, Peel G et al.. Management of pediatric skin-graft donor sites: a randomized controlled trial of three wound care products. J Burn Care Res 2015;36(1):159–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000161 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar52 Chaby G, Senet P, Vaneau M, Martel P et al.. Dressings for acute and chronic wounds: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol 2007; 143(10):1297–1304. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.143.10.1297 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar53 Guthrie J, Potter R. Clinical acceptability of a dressing with matrix technology: a multisite evaluation of acute and chronic wounds. J Wound Care 2016; 25(8):465–469. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2016.25.8.465 Link, Google Scholar54 Andersen KE, Franken CPM, Gad P et al.. A randomized, controlled study to compare the effectiveness of two foam dressings in the management of lower leg ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage 2002; 48(8):34–41. Google Scholar55 Saco M, Howe N, Nathoo R, Cherpelis B. Comparing the efficacies of alginate, foam, hydrocolloid, hydrofiber, and hydrogel dressings in the management of diabetic foot ulcers and venous leg ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining how to dress for success. Dermatol Online J 2016; 22(8):13030/qt7ph5v17z Google Scholar56 Dumville JC, Deshpande S, O'Meara S, Speak K. Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (6):CD009111. Medline, Google Scholar57 Dumville JC, Soares MO, O'Meara S, Cullum N. Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison: dressings to heal diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetologia 2012; 55(7):1902–1910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-012-2558–5 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar58 O'Meara S, Martyn-St James M. Foam dressings for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (5):CD009907 Medline, Google Scholar59 Dini V, Romanelli M, Andriessen A et al.. Improvement of periulcer skin condition in venous leg ulcer patients: prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded clinical trial comparing a biosynthetic cellulose dressing with a foam dressing. Adv Skin Wound Care 2013; 26(8):352–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000431237.22658.15 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar60 Alvarez OM, Phillips TJ, Menzoian JO, Patel M, Andriessen A et al.. An RCT to compare a bio-cellulose wound dressing with a non-adherent dressing in VLUs. J Wound Care 2012; 21(9):448–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2012.21.9.448 Link, Google Scholar61 Kelechi TJ, Mueller M, Hankin CS et al.. A randomized, investigator-blinded, controlled pilot study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a poly-N-acetyl glucosamine–derived membrane material in patients with venous leg ulcers. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012; 66(6):e209–e215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2011.01.031 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar62 Wild T, Eberlein T, Andriessen A. Wound cleansing efficacy of two cellulose-based dressings. Wounds UK. 2010;3:14–21. Google Scholar63 Andriessen A, Polignano R, Abel M. Monitoring the microcirculation to evaluate dressing performance in patients with venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 2009; 18(4):145–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2009.18.4.41606 Link, Google Scholar64 Franks PJ, Moody M, Moffatt CJ et al.. Randomized trial of two foam dressings in the management of chronic venous ulceration. Wound Repair Regen 2007; 15(2):197–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00205.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar65 Meaume S, Dompmartin A, Lok C et al.. Quality of life in patients with leg ulcers: results from CHALLENGE, a double-blind randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2017; 26(7):368–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2017.26.7.368 Link, Google Scholar66 Meaume S, Dissemond J, Addala A et al.. Evaluation of two fibrous wound dressings for the management of leg ulcers: results of a European randomised controlled trial (EARTH RCT). J Wound Care 2014; 23(3):105-116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2014.23.3.105 Link, Google Scholar67 Dereure O, Mikosinki J, Zegota Z, Allaert FA. RCT to evaluate a hyaluronic acid containing gauze pad in leg ulcers of venous or mixed aetiology. J Wound Care. 2012; 21(11):539–547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2012.21.11.539 Link, Google Scholar68 Meaume S1, Ourabah Z, Romanelli M et al. Efficacy and tolerance of a hydrocolloid dressing containing hyaluronic acid for the treatment of leg ulcers of venous or mixed origin. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24(10):2729–2739. doi: https://doi.org/10.1185/03007990802367041. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar69 Schmutz JL, Meaume S, Fays S et al.. Evaluation of the nano-oligosaccharide factor lipido-colloid matrix in the local management of venous leg ulcers: results of a randomised, controlled trial. Int Wound J 2008; 5(2):172–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2008.00453.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar70 Nelson EA, Prescott RJ, Harper DR et al.. A factorial, randomized trial of pentoxifylline or placebo, four-layer or single-layer compression, and knitted viscose or hydrocolloid dressings for venous ulcers. J Vasc Surg 2007; 45(1):134–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.043 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar71 Romanelli M, Dini V, Bertone MS. Randomized comparison of OASIS wound matrix versus moist wound dressing in the treatment of difficult-to-heal wounds of mixed arterial/venous etiology. Adv Skin Wound Care 2010; 23(1):34–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000363485.17224.26 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar72 Romanelli M, Dini V, Bertone M et al.. OASIS wound matrix versus Hyaloskin in the treatment of difficult-to-heal wounds of mixed arterial/venous aetiology. Int Wound J 2007; 4(1):3–7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2007.00300.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar73 Hundeshagen G, Collins VN, Wurzer P et al.. A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Outpatient Treatment of Pediatric and Adult Partial-Thickness Burns with Suprathel or Mepilex Ag. J Burn Care Res 2017; 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000584 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar74 Hess CT. [Hydrocolloids: Healing by Occlusion.]. Adv Wound Care 2010(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/9781934854013.110 Google Scholar75 Ågren MS, Mertza PM, Franzén L. A comparative study of three occlusive dressings in the treatment of full-thickness wounds in pigs. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 36(1):53–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(97)70325-6 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar76 Varghese MC, Balin AK, Carter DM, Caldwell D. Local environment of chronic wounds under synthetic dressings. Arch Dermatol 1986; 122(1):52–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1986.01660130056025 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar77 Kimmel HM, Grant A, Ditata J. The Presence of Oxygen in Wound Healing. Wounds 2016; 28(8):264–270 Medline, Google Scholar78 Field CK, Kerstein MD. Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg 1994; 167(1 1A):S2–S6. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(94)90002-7 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar79. Soltan Dallal MM, Safdari R et al.. A comparison between occlusive and exposure dressing in the management of burn wound. Burns 2016; 42(3):578–582. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.05.001 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar80 Haith LR, Stair-Buchmann ME, Ackerman BH et al.. Evaluation of Aquacel Ag for Autogenous Skin Donor Sites. J Burn Care Res 2015; 36(6):602–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0000000000000212 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar81 Chadwick P, McCardle J. Open, non-comparative, multi-centre post clinical study of the performance and safety of a gelling fibre wound dressing on diabetic foot ulcers. J Wound Care 2016; 25(5):290–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2016.25.5.290 Link, Google Scholar82 Barnea Y, Amir A, Leshem D et al.. Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53(2):132–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000112349.42549.b3 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar83 Robinson BJ. The use of a hydrofibre dressing in wound management. J Wound Care 2000; 9(1):32–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2000.9.1.25941 Link, Google Scholar84 Meaume S, Perez J, Descamps H, Voinchet V, Jault P, Saunier V, et al.. Use of a new, flexible lipidocolloid dressing on acute and chronic wounds: results of a clinical study. J Wound Care 2011; 20(4):180–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2011.20.4.180 Link, Google Scholar85 Karlsson M, Lindgren M, Jarnhed-Andersson I, Tarpila E. Dressing the split-thickness skin graft donor site: a randomized clinical trial. Adv Skin Wound Care 2014; 27(1):20–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASW.0000437786.92529.22 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar86 Dornseifer U, Lonic D, Gerstung TI et al.. The ideal split-thickness skin graft donor-site dressing: a clinical comparative trial of a modified polyurethane dressing and aquacel. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128(4):918–924. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182268c02 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar87 Dumville JC, Deshpande S, O'Meara S, Speak K. Hydrocolloid dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (2):CD009099 Medline, Google Scholar88 Palfreyman S, Nelson EA, Michaels JA. Dressings for venous leg ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007; 335(7613):244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39248.634977.AE Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar89 Valle MF, Maruthur NM, Wilson LM, Malas M, Qazi U, Haberl E, et al.. Comparative effectiveness of advanced wound dressings for patients with chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review. Wound Repair Regen 2014; 22(2):193–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12151 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar90 Pott FS, Meier MJ, Stocco JG et al.. The effectiveness of hydrocolloid dressings versus other dressings in the healing of pressure ulcers in adults and older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2014; 22(3):511–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3480.2445 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar91 Health CAfDaTi. Dressing Materials for the Treatment of Pressure Ulcers in Patients in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Review of the Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines. Ottawa ON. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. 2013; 2013(Nov):18. Google Scholar92 Singh A, Halder S, Chumber S et al.. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds. Asian J Surg 2004; 27(4):326–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60061-0 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar93 Verbelen J, Hoeksema H, Heyneman A et al.. Aquacel((R)) Ag dressing versus Acticoat dressing in partial thickness burns: a prospective, randomized, controlled study in 100 patients. Part 1: burn wound healing. Burns 2014; 40(3):416–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.07.008 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar94 Muangman P, Pundee C, Opasanon S, Muangman S. A prospective, randomized trial of silver containing hydrofiber dressing versus 1% silver sulfadiazine for the treatment of partial thickness burns. Int Wound J 2010; 7(4):271–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00690.x Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar95 Hoffman AS. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2012; 64:18–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.010 Crossref, Google Scholar96 Eisenbud D, Hunter H, Kessler L, Zulkowski K. Hydrogel wound dressings: where do we stand in 2003? Ostomy Wound Manage 2003; 49(10):52–57 Medline, Google Scholar97 Sawada Y, Urushidate S, Yotsuyanagi T, Ishita K. Is prolonged and excessive cooling of a scalded wound effective? Burns 1997; 23(1):55–58 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar98 Atkin L, Rippon M. Autolysis: mechanisms of action in the removal of devitalised tissue. Br J Nurs 2016; 25(20 Suppl):S40–S47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2016.25.20.S40 Link, Google Scholar99 Madaghiele M, Sannino A, Ambrosio L, Demitri C. Polymeric hydrogels for burn wound care: Advanced skin wound dressings and regenerative templates. Burns Trauma 2014; 2(4):153–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-3868.143616 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar100 Sun G, Zhang X, Shen YI et al.. Dextran hydrogel scaffolds enhance angiogenic responses and promote complete skin regeneration during burn wound healing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108(52):20976–20981. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1115973108 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar101 Poranki D, Whitener W, Howse S et al.. Evaluation of skin regeneration after burns in vivo and rescue of cells after thermal stress in vitro following treatment with a keratin biomaterial. J Biomater Appl 2014; 29(1):26–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328213513310 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar102 Nacer Khodja A, Mahlous M et al.. Evaluation of healing activity of PVA/chitosan hydrogels on deep second degree burn: pharmacological and toxicological tests. Burns 2013; 39(1):98–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2012.05.021 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar103 Meng H, Chen L, Ye Z et al.. The effect of a self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffold (peptide) when used as a wound dressing for the treatment of deep second degree burns in rats. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009; 89B(2):379–391. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31226 Crossref, Google Scholar104 Loo Y, Wong YC, Cai EZ et al.. Ultrashort peptide nanofibrous hydrogels for the acceleration of healing of burn wounds. Biomaterials 2014; 35(17):4805–4814. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.02.047 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar105 Shen YI, Song HH, Papa AE et al.. Acellular Hydrogels for Regenerative Burn Wound Healing: Translation from a Porcine Model. J Invest Dermatol 2015 Oct;135(10):2519–2529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2015.182 Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar106 Guilbaud J. European comparative clinical study of Inerpan: a new wound dressing in treatment of partial skin thickness burns. Burns 1992; 18(5):419–422. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar107 Loan F, Cassidy S, Marsh C, Simcock J. Keratin-based products for effective wound care management in superficial and partial thickness burns injuries. Burns 2016; 42(3):541–547. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar108 Wasiak J, Cleland H, Campbell F, Spinks A. Dressings for superficial and partial thickness burns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (3):CD002106 Medline, Google Scholar109 Dumville JC, O'Meara S, Deshpande S, Speak K. Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; (9):CD009101 Medline, Google Scholar110 Dumville JC, Stubbs N, Keogh SJ, Walker RM, Liu Z. Hydrogel dressings for treating pressure ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (2):CD011226 Medline, Google Scholar111 Thomas S. A
Publication Year: 2018
Publication Date: 2018-06-01
Language: en
Type: review
Indexed In: ['crossref', 'pubmed']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 59
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot