Title: Is Tomosynthesis the Future of Breast Cancer Screening?
Abstract: HomeRadiologyVol. 287, No. 1 PreviousNext Reviews and CommentaryEditorialIs Tomosynthesis the Future of Breast Cancer Screening?Etta D. Pisano Etta D. Pisano Author AffiliationsFrom the Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 76 Putnam Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139.Address correspondence to the author (e-mail: [email protected]).Etta D. Pisano Published Online:Mar 20 2018https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018172953MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References1. Caumo F, Zorzi M, Brunelli S, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis with synthesized two-dimensional images versus full-field digital mammography for population screening: outcomes from the Verona screening program. Radiology 2018;287(1)37–46. Link, Google Scholar2. Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA 2014;311(24):2499–2507. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3. Lourenco AP, Barry-Brooks M, Baird GL, Tuttle A, Mainiero MB. Changes in recall type and patient treatment following implementation of screening digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiology 2015;274(2):337–342. Link, Google Scholar4. Destounis S, Arieno A, Morgan R. Initial experience with combination digital breast tomosynthesis plus full field digital mammography or full field digital mammography alone in the screening environment. J Clin Imaging Sci 2014;4(1):9. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar5. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(7):583–589. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013;267(1):47–56. Link, Google Scholar7. Aujero MP, Gavenonis SC, Benjamin R, Zhang Z, Holt JS. Clinical performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography combined with tomosynthesis in a large screening population. Radiology 2017;283(1):70–76. Link, Google Scholar8. Zuckerman SP, Conant EF, Keller BM, et al. Implementation of synthesized two-dimensional mammography in a population-based digital breast tomosynthesis screening program. Radiology 2016;281(3):730–736. Link, Google Scholar9. U.S. Food and Drug Administration MQSA national statistics website. https://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/FacilityScorecard/ucm113858.htm. Accessed December 7, 2017. Google Scholar10. Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7(1):18–27. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar11. Oeffinger KC, Fontham ET, Etzioni R, et al. Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. JAMA 2015;314(15):1599–1614. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12. Siu AL; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med 2016;164(4):279–296. [Published correction appears in Ann Intern Med 2016;164(6):448.] Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryReceived December 15, 2017; final version accepted January 18, 2018.Published online: Mar 20 2018Published in print: Apr 2018 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByDigital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography Screening Performance on Successive Screening Rounds from the Breast Cancer Surveillance ConsortiumBrian L. Sprague, Rebecca Yates Coley, Kathryn P. Lowry, Karla Kerlikowske, Louise M. Henderson, Yu-Ru Su, Christoph I. Lee, Tracy Onega, Erin J. A. Bowles, Sally D. Herschorn, Roberta M. diFlorio-Alexander, Diana L. Miglioretti, 30 May 2023 | Radiology, Vol. 307, No. 5Opportunities and challenges of digital world of multimodal interventional breast radiology (review)N. I.Rozhkova, I. I.Burdina, S. B.Zapirova, A. D.Kaprin, M. L.Mazo, S. Yu.Mikushin, S. P.Prokopenko, O. E.Yakobs2023 | Medical alphabet, No. 31Principles and Practice of Clinical TrialsPhilip C.Prorok2022Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis Performance in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer, 2007–2016Janie M. Lee, Laura E. Ichikawa, Karen J. Wernli, Erin Bowles, Jennifer M. Specht, Karla Kerlikowske, Diana L. Miglioretti, Kathryn P. Lowry, Anna N. A. Tosteson, Natasha K. Stout, Nehmat Houssami, Tracy Onega, Diana S. M. Buist, 18 May 2021 | Radiology, Vol. 300, No. 2Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Update on Technology, Evidence, and Clinical PracticeYiming Gao, Linda Moy, Samantha L. Heller, 5 February 2021 | RadioGraphics, Vol. 41, No. 2Sustainable Benefits of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis ScreeningMin Sun Bae, 10 November 2020 | Radiology, Vol. 298, No. 1Supplemental Screening for Patients at Intermediate and High Risk for Breast CancerLilianWang, Roberta M.Strigel2021 | Radiologic Clinics of North America, Vol. 59, No. 1Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and RoundEmily F. Conant, Samantha P. Zuckerman, Elizabeth S. McDonald, Susan P. Weinstein, Katrina E. Korhonen, Julia A. Birnbaum, Jennifer D. Tobey, Mitchell D. Schnall, Rebecca A. Hubbard, 10 March 2020 | Radiology, Vol. 295, No. 2Consecutive Screening Rounds with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Enable Detection of Breast Cancers with Poor PrognosisLinda Moy, Samantha L. Heller, 10 March 2020 | Radiology, Vol. 295, No. 2Principles and Practice of Clinical TrialsPhilip C.Prorok2020Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Concepts and Clinical PracticeAlice Chong, Susan P. Weinstein, Elizabeth S. McDonald, Emily F. Conant, 14 May 2019 | Radiology, Vol. 292, No. 1Is Digital Breast Tomosynthesis the Better Mammogram for Local Breast Cancer Staging?Linda Moy, 9 April 2019 | Radiology, Vol. 291, No. 3Impact of New Technology Adoption on Breast Cancer ScreeningChristoph I. Lee, Janie M. Lee, 11 December 2018 | Radiology, Vol. 290, No. 3Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast DensityEmily F.Conant, William E.Barlow, Sally D.Herschorn, Donald L.Weaver, Elisabeth F.Beaber, Anna N. A.Tosteson, Jennifer S.Haas, Kathryn P.Lowry, Natasha K.Stout, AmyTrentham-Dietz, Roberta M.diFlorio-Alexander, Christopher I.Li, Mitchell D.Schnall, TracyOnega, Brian L.Sprague2019 | JAMA Oncology, Vol. 5, No. 5Towards improving accuracy, effectiveness, and efficiency in breast cancer screeningMartin JYaffe2018 | The Lancet Oncology, Vol. 19, No. 11Recommended Articles Does Reader Performance with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Vary according to Experience with Two-dimensional Mammography?Radiology2017Volume: 283Issue: 2pp. 371-380Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening TrialRadiology2019Volume: 293Issue: 2pp. 273-281The Coming of Age of Breast Tomosynthesis in ScreeningRadiology2019Volume: 291Issue: 1pp. 31-33Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Synthetic 2D Mammography versus Digital Mammography: Evaluation in a Population-based Screening ProgramRadiology2018Volume: 287Issue: 3pp. 787-794Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening PopulationRadiology2017Volume: 283Issue: 1pp. 70-76See More RSNA Education Exhibits Let's Talk about Next-Generation Breast Cancer Screening Programs: How Should We Do? What Should We Use?Digital Posters2020Breast Imaging Controversies In The Elderly PopulationDigital Posters2021Breast Density Included in the Modern Rules of Mammographic ScreeningDigital Posters2019 RSNA Case Collection Invasive ductal carcinoma as developing asymmetryRSNA Case Collection2021Invasive Lobular CarcinomaRSNA Case Collection2021Slow-growing cancerRSNA Case Collection2020 Vol. 287, No. 1 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download