Title: Jig-Shape Optimization of Low-Boom Supersonic Aircraft
Abstract: No AccessEngineering NoteJig-Shape Optimization of Low-Boom Supersonic AircraftChan-gi PakChan-gi PakNASA Armstrong Flight Research Center, Edwards, California 93523-0273*Senior Aerospace Engineer, Aerostructures Branch, P.O. Box 273/Mail Stop 48201A. Senior Member AIAA.Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:9 Aug 2018https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034851SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Bhatia K. G. and Wertheimer J., “Aeroelastic Challenges for a High Speed Civil Transport,” AIAA Paper 1993-1478, April 1993. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-1478 LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Ordaz I., Geiselhart K. A. and Fenbert J. W., “Conceptual Design of Low-Boom Aircraft with Flight Trim Requirement,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 52, No. 3, 2015, pp. 932–939. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033160 LinkGoogle Scholar[3] Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J. and Haftka R. T., “Multidisciplinary Aerospace Design Optimization: Survey of Recent Developments,” AIAA Paper 1996-0711, Jan. 1996. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1996-711 Google Scholar[4] Röhl P. J., Mavris D. N. and Schrage D. P., “Combined Aerodynamic and Structural Optimization of High-Speed Civil Transport Wing,” AIAA Paper 1995-1222, April 1995. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-1222 LinkGoogle Scholar[5] Carlson H. W., Chu J., Ozoroski L. P. and McCullers L. A., “Guide to AERO2S and WINGDES Computer Codes for Prediction and Minimization of Drag Due to Lift,” NASA TP-3637, 1997. Google Scholar[6] Neill D. J., Johnson E. H. and Canfield R., “ASTROS—A Multidisciplinary Automated Structural Design Tool,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 27, No. 12, 1990, pp. 1021–1027. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.45976-713 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Baker M. and Giesing J., “A Practical Approach to MDO and its Application to an HSCT Aircraft,” AIAA Paper 1995-3885, Sept. 1995. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1995-3885 Google Scholar[8] Tzong T. J., Sikes G. D. and Loikkanen M. J., “Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Large Transport Aircraft Wing,” AIAA Paper 1992-1002, Feb. 1992. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1992-1002 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] D’Vari R. and Baker M., “A Static and Dynamic Aeroelastic Loads and Sensitivity Analysis for Structural Loads Optimization and Its Application to Transport Aircraft,” AIAA Paper 1993-1643, April 1993. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1993-1643 Google Scholar[10] Aly S., Ogot M., Pelz R. and Siclari M., “Jig-Shape Static Aeroelastic Wing Design Problem: A Decoupled Approach,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2002, pp. 1061–1066. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3035 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Pak C.-g., “Preliminary Development of an Object-Oriented Optimization Tool,” NASA TM-2011-216419, 2011. Google Scholar[12] Pak C.-g. and Truong S. S., “Extension of an Object-Oriented Optimization Tool: User’s Reference Manual,” NASA TM-2015-218733, 2015. Google Scholar[13] Pak C.-g. “Optimization Tool Integrates Software to Automate Design Process,” NASA, 2012, https://www.nasa.gov/offices/ipp/centers/dfrc/technology/DRC-010-013-O3-Tool.html [retrieved 5 Oct. 2017]. Google Scholar[14] Pak C.-g. and Truong S., “Creating a Test-Validated Finite-Element Model of the X-56A Aircraft Structure,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 52, No. 5, 2015, pp. 1644–1667. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033043 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Pak C.-g., “Unsteady Aerodynamic Model Tuning for Precise Flutter Prediction,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2011, pp. 2178–2184. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031495 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Li W. W. and Pak C.-g., “Mass Balancing Optimization Study to Reduce Flutter Speeds of the X-56A Aircraft,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 52, No. 4, 2015, pp. 1359–1365. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033044 LinkGoogle Scholar[17] Pak C.-g., “Aeroelastic Tailoring Study of an N+2 Low-boom Supersonic Commercial Transport Aircraft,” AIAA Paper 2015-2791, June 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-2791 LinkGoogle Scholar[18] Pak C.-g., “Jig-Shape Optimization of a Low-Boom Supersonic Aircraft,” 2018 AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, AIAA Paper 2018-2154, 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-2154 LinkGoogle Scholar[19] MSC Nastran 2005 Quick Reference Guide, MacNeal-Schwendler Corp., Newport Beach, CA, 2005. Google Scholar[20] ZAERO User’s Manual Version 8.5, ZONA Technology, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, 2011. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byLinear and Geometrically Nonlinear Structural Shape Sensing from Strain DataChan-Gi Pak28 November 2022 | AIAA Journal, Vol. 61, No. 2Flexibility Assessment of the Aeroelastic-flight-dynamic Behavior for Supersonic AircraftThiago A. Guimarães, Carlos E. Cesnik and Ilya Kolmanovsky19 January 2023Unsteady Vortex Lattice Linearization and Sensitivity Analyses for Control Models in Supersonic Aircraft DesignThiago A. Guimarães, Carlos E. Cesnik and Ilya Kolmanovsky19 January 2023Linear and Geometrically Nonlinear Structural Shape Sensing from Strain Data using the Basis Function MethodChan-gi Pak19 January 2023Conceptual aerodynamic design of an executive supersonic passenger aircraft – ESPA7 June 2021 | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 236, No. 5An Integrated Low-Speed Aeroelastic-Flight-Dynamics Framework for Modeling Supersonic AircraftThiago A. Guimarães, Carlos E. Cesnik and Ilya V. Kolmanovsky29 December 2021Multiple Shaker Placement for Ground Vibration Test of X-59 Aircraft using Topology OptimizationChan-gi Pak5 January 2020Shape Sensing for Wings with Spars and Ribs using Strain DataChan-gi Pak6 January 2019 What's Popular Volume 55, Number 5September 2018 CrossmarkInformationThis material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0021-8669 (print) or 1533-3868 (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAircraft Components and StructureAircraft DesignAircraft Operations and TechnologyAircraft Stability and ControlAircraft StabilizerAircraft Wing ComponentsAircraft Wing DesignAircraftsAirfoilAirfoil NomenclatureFlight Control SurfacesWing Configurations KeywordsShape OptimizationCommercial AircraftNumerical OptimizationNASA Armstrong Flight Research CenterAerodynamic PerformanceStabilatorAircraft ConfigurationsFinite Element ModelingHigh Speed Civil TransportAerodynamic Shape OptimizationAcknowledgmentsThe work presented in this paper was funded by the Low Boom Flight Demonstration Project under the NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate.PDF Received25 November 2017Accepted5 May 2018Published online9 August 2018