Title: Beyond cladistics: Extending evolutionary classifications into deeper time levels
Abstract: TAXONVolume 59, Issue 2 p. 345-350 Points of ViewFree Access Beyond cladistics: Extending evolutionary classifications into deeper time levels Elvira Hörandl, Corresponding Author Elvira Hörandl [email protected] Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, AustriaSearch for more papers by this author Elvira Hörandl, Corresponding Author Elvira Hörandl [email protected] Department of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, AustriaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 01 April 2010 https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.592001Citations: 27AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Literature Cited Albach, D. 2008. Further arguments for the rejection of paraphyletic taxa: Veronica subgen. Pseudolysimachium (Plantaginaceae). Taxon 57: 1– 6. Alexander, P.J. 2006. Descent and modification in evolutionary systematics. Taxon 55: 4. Bateman, R.M., Hilton, J. & Rudall, P.J. 2006. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic context of the angiosperms: Contrasting the ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ approaches used to infer the likely characteristics of the first flowers. J. Exp. Bot. 13: 3471– 3503. Burleigh, J.G., Mathews, S. 2004. Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: Implications for resolving the seed plant tree of life. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 1599– 1613. Brickell, C.D., Crawley, M., Cullen, J., Frodin, D.G., Gardner, M., Grey-Wilson, C., Hillier, J., Knees, S., Lancaster, R., Mathew, B.F., Matthews, V.A., Miller, T., Noltie, H.F., Norton, S., Oake-ley, H.J., Richards, J. & Woodhead, J. 2008. Do the views of users of taxonomic output count for anything? Taxon 57: 1047– 1048. Brummitt, R.K. 2002. How to chop up a tree. Taxon 51: 31– 41. Brummitt, R.K. 2006. Am I a bony fish? Taxon 55: 2– 3. Brummitt, R.K. 2008. Evolution in taxonomic perspective. Taxon 57: 1049– 1050. Cantino, P.D., Doyle, J.A., Graham, S.W., Judd, W.S., Olmstead,R.G., Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S. & Donoghue, M.J. 2007. Phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta. Taxon 56: 822– 846. De Queiroz, K. 2006. The PhyloCode and the distinction between taxonomy and nomenclature. Syst. Biol. 55: 160– 162. Doyle, J.A. 1996. Seed plant phylogeny and the relationships of Gne-tales. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 157: S3- S39. Ebach, M.C., Williams, D.M. & Morrone, J.J. 2006. Paraphyly is bad taxonomy. Taxon 55: 831– 832. Emadzade, K., Lehnebach, C., Lockhart, P. & HSrandl, E. In press. A molecular phylogeny, morphology and classification of genera of Ranunculeae (Ranunculaceae). Taxon. Farjon, A. 2007. In defence of a conifer taxonomy which recognises evolution. Taxon 56: 639– 641. Futuyma, D.J. 2005. Evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer. Hajibabaei, M., Xia, J. & Drouin, G. 2006. Seed plant phylogeny: Gnetophytes are derived conifers and a sister group to Pinaceae. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 40: 208– 217 Harlin, M. 2003. On the relationship between content, ancestor, and ancestry in phylogenetic nomenclature. Cladistics 19: 144– 147. Hilton, J. & Bateman, R. J. 2006. Pteridosperms are the backbone of seed-plant phylogeny. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 133: 119– 168. HSrandl, E. 2006. Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa—evolutionary versus cladistic classifications. Taxon 55: 564– 570. HSrandl, E. 2007. Neglecting evolution is bad taxonomy. Taxon 55: 1– 5. HSrandl, E., Greilhuber, J., Klimova, K., Paun, O., Temsch, E., Emadzade, K. & Hodalova, I. 2009. Reticulate evolution and taxonomic concepts in the Ranunculus auricomus complex (Ra-nunculaceae): Insights from morphological, karyological and molecular data. Taxon 58: 1194– 1215. Huson, D.H. & Bryant, D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molec. Biol. Evol. 23: 254– 267. Joly, S., McLenachan P.A. & Lockhart, P.J. 2009. A statistical approach for distinguishing hybridization and incomplete lineage sorting. Amer. Naturalist 174: E54- E70. Knoop, V. & Muller, K. 2006. Gene undStammbdume: ein Handbuch zur molekularen Phylogenetik. Munich: Elsevier. Mayr, E. & Bock, W.J. 2002. Classifications and other ordering systems. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 40: 169– 194. Mishler, B.D. 2009. Three centuries of paradigm changes in biological classification: Is the end in sight? Taxon 58: 61– 67. Nordal, I. & Stedje, B. 2005. Paraphyletic taxa should be accepted. Taxon 54: 5– 6. Pisani, D., Cotton, J.A. & Mclnerney, J.O. 2007. Supertrees disentangle the chimerical origin in the eukaryotic genomes. Molec. Biol. Evol. 24: 1752– 1760. Podani, J. 2009. Taxonomy versus evolution. Taxon 58: 1049– 1053. Richter, S., Moller, O.S., Wirkner, C.S. 2009. Advances in Crustacean phylogenetics. Arthropod Syst. Phylog. 67: 275– 286. Rudall, P.J. & Bateman, R.M. 2007. Developmental bases for key innovations in the seed-plant microgametophyte. Trends Pl. Sci. 12: 317– 326. Stevens, P.F. 2006. An end to all things? Plants and their names. Austral. Syst. Bot. 19: 115– 133. Stuessy, T.F. 2004. A transitional-combinational theory for the origin of angiosperms. Taxon 53: 3– 16. Stuessy, T.F. 2009a. Paradigms in biological classification (1707-2007): Has anything really changed? Taxon 58: 68– 76. Stuessy, T.F. 2009b. Plant taxonomy: The systematic evaluation of comparative data, 2nd ed. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. Stuessy, T.F. & KSnig, C. 2008. Patrocladistic classification. Taxon 57: 594– 601. Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S. & Meyer, A. 2009. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nature Rev. Genet. 10: 725– 732. Van Wyk, A.E. 2007. The end justifies the means. Taxon 56: 645– 648. Wiley, E.O. 2009. Patrocladistics, nothing new. Taxon 58: 2– 6. Wood, T.E., Takebayashi, N., Barker, M.S., Mayrose I., Greenspoond P.B. & Rieseberg L.H. 2009. The frequency of polyploid specia-tion in vascular plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106: 1387513879. Citing Literature Volume59, Issue2April 2010Pages 345-350 ReferencesRelatedInformation