Title: <i>Opinion</i>: What Are the Problems with Using the Peritoneal Membrane for Long‐Term Dialysis?
Abstract: Seminars in DialysisVolume 21, Issue 1 p. 16-19 Opinion: What Are the Problems with Using the Peritoneal Membrane for Long-Term Dialysis? Wai Kei Lo, Wai Kei Lo Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong KongSearch for more papers by this author Wai Kei Lo, Wai Kei Lo Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong KongSearch for more papers by this author First published: 22 October 2007 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-139X.2007.00385_3.x Address correspondence to: Wai Kei Lo, MD, Department of Medicine, Tung Wah Hospital, 12 Po Yan Street, Hong Kong, or e-mail: [email protected]. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References 1 Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. Am J Kidney Dis 48(Suppl. 1): S99– S163, 2006 2 European Best Practice Guidelines for peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl 20(Suppl. 9): ix1– ix37, 2005 3 Lo WK, Bargman J, Burkart J, Krediet RT, Pollock C, Kawanishi H, Blake P: The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guideline on targets for solute and fluid removal in adult patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 26: 520– 522, 2006 4 Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, Correa-Rotter R, Ramos A, Moran J, et al.: Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 1307– 1320, 2002 5 Lo WK, Ho YW, Li CS, Chan TM, Wong KS, Yu AWY, et al.: Effect of Kt/V on survival and clinical outcome in CAPD patients in a randomised prospective study. Kidney Int 64: 649– 656, 2003 6 Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M, Morrison HI, Mao Y, Copleston P, et al.: Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis 30: 334– 342, 1997 7 Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M: Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl 17: 112– 117, 2002 8 Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Van Manen JG, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT: Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: Comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 2851– 2860, 2003 9 Jaar BG, Coresh J, Plantinga LC, Fink NE, Klag MJ, Levey AS, et al.: Comparing the risk for death with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in a national cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med 143: 174– 183, 2005 10 Lo WK, Lui SL, Chan TM, Li K, Lam MF, Tse KC, Tang SCW, Choy CBY, Lai KN: Minimal and optimal peritoneal Kt/V targets – results of an anuric peritoneal dialysis patients survival analysis. Kidney Int 67: 2032– 2038, 2005 11 Jansen MAM, Termorshuizen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW, Boeschoten E, Krediet RT: Predictors of survival in anuric peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int 68: 1199– 1205, 2005 12 Szeto CC, Wong TYH, Chow KM, Leung CB, Law MC, Wang AYM, Lui SF, Li PKT: Impact of dialysis adequacy on the mortality and morbidity of anuric Chinese patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 355– 360, 2001 13 Brown EA, Davies SJ, Rutherford P, et al.: Survival of functionally anuric patients on automated peritoneal dialysis: The European APD Outcome Study. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 2948– 2957, 2003 14 Locatelli F, Marcelli D, Conte F, Limido A, Malberti A, Spotti D: Comparison of mortality in ESRD patients on convective and diffusive extracorporeal treatments. The Registro Lombardo Dialisis E Trapianto. Kidney Int 55: 286– 293, 1999 15 Kim DJ, Do JH, Huh WS, et al.: Dissociation between clearances of small and middle molecules in incremental peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 21: 462– 466, 2001 16 Araujo T, Maria R, Pecoits-Filho RF, Romao JE Jr, Sabbaga E, Marcondes MM, Abensur H: The relationship between ultrafiltrate volume with icodextrin and peritoneal transport pattern according to the peritoneal equilibration test. Perit Dial Int 22: 229– 233, 2002 17 Demetriou D, Habicht A, Schillinger M, Horl WH, Vychytil A: Adequacy of automated peritoneal dialysis with and without manual daytime exchange: a randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int 70: 1649– 1655, 2006 18 Finkelstein F, Healy H, Abu0alfa A, Ahmad S, Brown F, Gehr T, Nash K, Sorkin M, Mujais S: Superiority of icodextrin compared with 4.25% dextrose for peritoneal ultrafiltration. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 546– 554, 2005 19 Lo WK, Cheng SW, Lo CY, Li FK, Chan TM, Cheng IKP: Patient and technique survival in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with a basic three liters daily exchanges – a twelve years single center experience in the pre-urea kinetics era. Hong Kong J Nephrol 1: 35– 40, 1999 Volume21, Issue1January/February 2008Pages 16-19 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Publication Year: 2007
Publication Date: 2007-10-22
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot