Title: The coalition and culture: ‘Bread, circuses and Britishness’
Abstract:‘Whenever I hear the word “culture”,’ observed Hermann Göring, ‘I reach for my revolver.’ Coalition ministers did not find it necessary to go armed when applying draconian cuts to public expenditure i...‘Whenever I hear the word “culture”,’ observed Hermann Göring, ‘I reach for my revolver.’ Coalition ministers did not find it necessary to go armed when applying draconian cuts to public expenditure in the arts. Victims (including supernumerary quangos) made token protests or simply agreed. Those who had prospered at New Labour's feast could scarcely object to coalition famine. In anticipation of their demise, certain organizations craftily anticipated their own salvation (see English Heritage and British Council, below). Of all areas of public policy stitched together by the coalition, the development of the arts and cultural institutions appeared least contentious. It was most likely to evoke what Winston Churchill described as ‘the broad harmony of thought’ that linked Tory and Liberal philosophy. However, the beginning was scarcely equitable. The Liberal Democrats’ coalition voice in the conduct of cultural policy was mute since no elected Liberal Democrats were appointed ministers in the Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). By the end of the coalition, total DCMS cultural spending reductions averaging 25 per cent, excluding the Olympic and Paralympic Games, at first condemned by the Left as reckless economy, had come to seem normal (see Table 16.1). The Labour Party, in its election manifesto for 2015, did not promise to reverse them.Read More
Publication Year: 2015
Publication Date: 2015-03-19
Language: en
Type: book-chapter
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 2
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot