Title: Virtudes y vicios argumentativos: A veinte años de Vértigos argumentales , de
Abstract: The aim of this paper is to analyze the importance and relevance of the Carlos Pereda’s thought in argumentation theory, focusing on his work entitled Vertigos Argumentales, which has as its central purpose the defense of an emphatic reason, not deprived of uncertainty, but neither of objectivity. Keeping in mind that Carlos Pereda’s theory of argumentation is close to his conception of rationality, the author turns to the analysis of issues that intersect, such as epistemic virtues, the concept of rationality, an ethics of argumentation, etc. The paper concludes with the view of argumentation through the concept of ‘practice’, where different aspects to be considered in argumentative action are pointed out. It concludes that Vertigos Argumentales formulated and developed some basic intuitions that are present in the contemporary debate about argumentation and virtue.
Publication Year: 2014
Publication Date: 2014-01-01
Language: en
Type: article
Access and Citation
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot