Title: The Case for Religious Inclusivism and the Judicial Recognition of Associational Rights: A Response to Lenta
Abstract: Jurisprudence in South Africa and Canada has been developing in a way that privileges individual religious autonomy over the communal dimension of rights to religious freedom and practice. In this paper, the intersection between law and religious freedom in both of these countries is explored. A reductive, anti-religious conception of the secular has taken hold in modern jurisprudence, limiting society’s ability to adopt an inclusive and tolerant pluralistic model. The Courts in South Africa and Canada are exhorted to address the communal nature of religious belief and reject the individualistic approach that has dominated their jurisprudence thus far. This paper also considers the problem of how to define religion, arguing that a minimum quorum of sincere believers united in a religious community is necessary to attract religious rights protections.
Publication Year: 2008
Publication Date: 2008-01-01
Language: en
Type: article
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 4
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot