Title: Mating Behavior and the Social Hierarchy in Small Flocks of White Leghorns
Abstract: Previous articleNext article No AccessMating Behavior and the Social Hierarchy in Small Flocks of White LeghornsA. M. Guhl, N. E. Collias, and W. C. AlleeA. M. Guhl Search for more articles by this author , N. E. Collias Search for more articles by this author , and W. C. Allee Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Volume 18, Number 4Oct., 1945 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.18.4.30151900 Views: 8Total views on this site Citations: 90Citations are reported from Crossref Journal History This article was published in Physiological Zoology (1928-1998), which is continued by Physiological and Biochemical Zoology (1999-present). PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Blair Fix Personal Income and Hierarchical Power, Journal of Economic Issues 53, no.44 (Dec 2019): 928–945.https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2019.1657746Blair Fix, Stefan Cristian Gherghina Energy, hierarchy and the origin of inequality, PLOS ONE 14, no.44 (Apr 2019): e0215692.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215692Tommaso Pizzari, Grant C. McDonald Sexual selection in socially-structured, polyandrous populations: Some insights from the fowl, (Jan 2019): 77–141.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.asb.2019.02.001Cedric Kai Wei Tan, Philippa Doyle, Emma Bagshaw, David S. Richardson, Stuart Wigby, Tommaso Pizzari The contrasting role of male relatedness in different mechanisms of sexual selection in red junglefowl, Evolution 71, no.22 (Jan 2017): 403–420.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13145Tommaso Pizzari The Wood-Gush legacy: A sociobiology perspective to fertility and welfare in chickens, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 181 (Aug 2016): 12–18.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.025Kayleigh A. Rose, Robert L. Nudds, Jonathan R. Codd Variety, sex and ontogenetic differences in the pelvic limb muscle architectural properties of leghorn chickens ( Gallus gallus domesticus ) and their links with locomotor performance, Journal of Anatomy 228, no.66 (Mar 2016): 952–964.https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12460 Bossing around the forest: power asymmetry and hierarchy, (Apr 2016): 77–111.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139060059.007Ashley Ward, Mike Webster Distributions of Costs and Benefits Within Groups, (Apr 2016): 111–124.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28585-6_6Kayleigh A. Rose, Robert L. Nudds, Patrick J. Butler, Jonathan R. Codd Sex differences in gait utilization and energy metabolism during terrestrial locomotion in two varieties of chicken ( Gallus gallus domesticus ) selected for different body size, Biology Open 4, no.1010 (Sep 2015): 1306–1315.https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.013094Hendrik S. van Kampen Violated expectancies: Cause and function of exploration, fear, and aggression, Behavioural Processes 117 (Aug 2015): 12–28.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.05.005Matthew J. Fuxjager, Jon L. Montgomery, Catherine A. Marler Species differences in the winner effect disappear in response to post-victory testosterone manipulations, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278, no.17241724 (Apr 2011): 3497–3503.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0301David R. Wilson, Ximena J. Nelson, Christopher S. Evans Seizing the Opportunity: Subordinate Male Fowl Respond Rapidly to Variation in Social Context, Ethology 115, no.1010 (Oct 2009): 996–1004.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01688.xI. Tiemann, G. Rehkämper Effect of artificial selection on female choice among domesticated chickens Gallus gallus f.d., Poultry Science 88, no.99 (Sep 2009): 1948–1954.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00250David R. Wilson, Karen L. Bayly, Ximena J. Nelson, Michael Gillings, Christopher S. Evans Alarm calling best predicts mating and reproductive success in ornamented male fowl, Gallus gallus, Animal Behaviour 76, no.33 (Sep 2008): 543–554.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.03.026Karen L. Bayly, Christopher S. Evans, Alan Taylor Measuring social structure: A comparison of eight dominance indices, Behavioural Processes 73, no.11 (Jul 2006): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.011Charlie K. Cornwallis, Tim R. Birkhead SOCIAL STATUS AND AVAILABILITY OF FEMALES DETERMINE PATTERNS OF SPERM ALLOCATION IN THE FOWL, Evolution 60, no.77 (Jul 2006): 1486–1493.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01227.xBoris Bilcik, Inma Estevez Impact of male–male competition and morphological traits on mating strategies and reproductive success in broiler breeders, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 92, no.44 (Aug 2005): 307–323.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.007David P Froman, Tommaso Pizzari, Allen J Feltmann, Hector Castillo-Juarez, Tim R Birkhead Sperm mobility: mechanisms of fertilizing efficiency, genetic variation and phenotypic relationship with male status in the domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 269, no.14911491 (Mar 2002): 607–612.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1925Tommaso Pizzari, Tim R. Birkhead For whom does the hen cackle? The function of postoviposition cackling, Animal Behaviour 61, no.33 (Mar 2001): 601–607.https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1620K Odén, K.S Vestergaard, B Algers Agonistic behaviour and feather pecking in single-sexed and mixed groups of laying hens, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62, no.2-32-3 (Feb 1999): 219–231.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00226-3J Brake Equipment design for breeding flocks, Poultry Science 77, no.1212 (Dec 1998): 1833–1841.https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.12.1833Lee Alan Dugatkin, Michael S. Alfieri, Allen J. Moore Can Dominance Hierarchies be Replicated? Form- re-form Experiments using the Cockroach (Nauphoeta cinerea), Ethology 97, no.1-21-2 (Apr 2010): 94–102.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1994.tb01032.xMarty L. Leonard, Liana Zanette, Brian K. Thompson, R. Wayne Fairfull Early exposure to the opposite sex affects mating behaviour in White Leghorn chickens, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 37, no.11 (Jun 1993): 57–67.https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90070-6E.A. Fontana, W.D. Weaver, H.P. Van Krey Intermittent Periods of Infertility Identified in Naturally Mated Broiler Breeder Hens, Journal of Applied Poultry Research 1, no.22 (Jul 1992): 190–193.https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/1.2.190PHILIP N. LEHNER Sampling Methods in Behavior Research, Poultry Science 71, no.44 (Apr 1992): 643–649.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0710643M.E.J. JONES, J.A. MENCH Behavioral Correlates of Male Mating Success in a Multisire Flock as Determined by DNA Fingerprinting, Poultry Science 70, no.77 (Jul 1991): 1493–1498.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0701493J. David Ligon, Randy Thornhill, Marlene Zuk, Kristine Johnson Male-male competition, ornamentation and the role of testosterone in sexual selection in red jungle fowl, Animal Behaviour 40, no.22 (Aug 1990): 367–373.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80932-7I.J.H. Duncan, P.M. Hocking, E. Seawright Sexual behaviour and fertility in broiler breeder domestic fowl, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 26, no.33 (May 1990): 201–213.https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90137-3R. Kendrick Moholt, Charles Trost Self-advertisement: Relations to dominance in black-billed magpies, Animal Behaviour 38, no.66 (Dec 1989): 1079–1081.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80147-2Mary Ann Ottinger, Joy A. Mench Reproductive behaviour in poultry: Implications for artificial insemination technology, British Poultry Science 30, no.22 (Jun 1989): 431–442.https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668908417167Daniel Q. Estep, Kees Nieuwenhuijsen, Katherine E.M. Bruce, Karel J. De Neef, Paul A. Walters, Suzanne C. Baker, A. Koos Slob Inhibition of sexual behaviour among subordinate stumptail macaques, Macaca arctoides, Animal Behaviour 36, no.33 (Jun 1988): 854–864.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80168-4V.A. Borowicz, H.B. Graves Social preferences of domestic hens for domestic vs. red junglefowl males and females, Behavioural Processes 12, no.22 (Feb 1986): 125–134.https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(86)90051-3A. L. Johnson Reproduction in the Male, (Jan 1986): 432–451.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4862-0_19H.B. Graves, C.P. Hable, T.H. Jenkins Sexual selection in gallus: Effects of morphology and dominance on female spatial behavior, Behavioural Processes 11, no.22 (Aug 1985): 189–197.https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(85)90060-9D.G. FOWLER, L.D. JENKINS THE EFFECTS OF DOMINANCE AND INFERTILITY OF RAMS ON REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE, (Jan 1985): 19–29.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-42444-0.50007-3P.B. Siegel The role of behavior in poultry production: A review of research, Applied Animal Ethology 11, no.44 (Feb 1984): 299–316.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(84)90040-3J. Rushen How peck orders of chickens are measured: A critical review, Applied Animal Ethology 11, no.33 (Jan 1984): 255–264.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(84)90032-4Jeff Rushen The development of sexual relationships in the domestic chicken, Applied Animal Ethology 11, no.11 (Sep 1983): 55–66.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(83)90079-2H.B. GRAVES Avian Reproduction: A Sociobiological Perspective, Poultry Science 62, no.88 (Aug 1983): 1667–1670.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0621667MARY ANN OTTINGER Hormonal Control of Reproductive Behavior in the Avian Male, Poultry Science 62, no.88 (Aug 1983): 1690–1699.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0621690Linda Marie Fedigan Dominance and reproductive success in primates, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 26, no.S1S1 (Oct 2012): 91–129.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330260506 Donald A. Dewsbury Dominance Rank, Copulatory Behavior, and Differential Reproduction, The Quarterly Review of Biology 57, no.22 (Oct 2015): 135–159.https://doi.org/10.1086/412672Joseph Lopreato Toward a theory of genuine altruism in Homo sapiens, Ethology and Sociobiology 2, no.33 (Jan 1981): 113–126.https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(81)90024-8C.C. Blohowiak, P.B. Siegel, H.P. Van Krey Sexual behavior of dwarf and normal genotypes in divergent growth lines of chickens, Applied Animal Ethology 6, no.22 (Apr 1980): 189–201.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(80)90069-3D.D. Kratzer, J.V. Craig Mating behavior of cockerels: Effects of social status, group size and group density, Applied Animal Ethology 6, no.11 (Jan 1980): 49–62.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(80)90093-0D.M. Ylander, J.V. Craig Inhibition of agonistic acts between domestic hens by a dominant third party, Applied Animal Ethology 6, no.11 (Jan 1980): 63–69.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(80)90094-2Edwin M. Banks, David G.M. Wood-Gush, Barry O. Hughes, Nicholas J. Mankovich Social rank and priority of access to resources in domestic fowl, Behavioural Processes 4, no.33 (Oct 1979): 197–209.https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(79)90001-9George T. Taylor Reinforcement and intraspecific aggressive behavior, Behavioral and Neural Biology 27, no.11 (Sep 1979): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-1047(79)92720-1A.L. Bhagwat, J.V. Craig Effects of male presence on agonistic behavior and productivity of White Leghorn hens, Applied Animal Ethology 5, no.33 (Jul 1979): 267–282.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(79)90061-0P. B. Siegel Behaviour Genetics in Chickens: A Review, World's Poultry Science Journal 35, no.11 (Sep 2019): 9–19.https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19790002Benson E. Ginsburg The Genetics of Social Behavior, (Jan 1978): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2901-5_1Sidney A. Gauthreaux The Ecological Significance of Behavioral Dominance, (Jan 1978): 17–54.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2901-5_2J.V. CRAIG, B. AL-RAWI, D.D. KRATZER Social Status and Sex Ratio Effects on Mating Frequency of Cockerels ,, Poultry Science 56, no.33 (May 1977): 767–772.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0560767D.G. Fowler, L.D. Jenkins The effects of dominance and infertility of rams on reproductive performance, Applied Animal Ethology 2, no.44 (Nov 1976): 327–337.https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(76)90066-3D.R. Lindsay, D.G. Dunsmore, J.D. Williams, G.J. Syme Audience effects on the mating behaviour of rams, Animal Behaviour 24, no.44 (Nov 1976): 818–821.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(76)80012-7P. D. Sturkie, H. Opel Reproduction in the Male, Fertilization, and Early Embryonic Development, (Jan 1976): 331–347.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-96274-5_17 R. Haven Wiley Evolution of Social Organization and Life-History Patterns Among Grouse, The Quarterly Review of Biology 49, no.33 (Oct 2015): 201–227.https://doi.org/10.1086/408083Günter Dörner Die neuroendokrine Regulation des Sexualverhaltens, (Jan 1972): 67–96.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-5603-2_2Paul B. Siegel Behavior: Genetics, BioScience 20, no.1010 (May 1970): 605–608.https://doi.org/10.2307/1295308L.L. ANDERSON SEXUAL BEHAVIOR AND CONTROLLING MECHANISMS IN DOMESTIC BIRDS AND MAMMALS, (Jan 1969): 541–568.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-179251-0.50025-1W. LORENZ REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC FOWL, (Jan 1969): 569–608.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-179251-0.50026-3I.F. Carte, A.T. Leighton Mating Behavior and Fertility in the Large White Turkey, Poultry Science 48, no.11 (Jan 1969): 104–114.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0480104Richard F. Gottier The Dominance-Submission Hierarchy in the Social Behavior of the Domestic Chicken, The Journal of Genetic Psychology 112, no.22 (Jun 1968): 205–226.https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1968.10533796S. Rappaport, M. Soller Mating Behavior, Fertility and Rate-of-Gain in Cornish Males , ,, Poultry Science 45, no.55 (Sep 1966): 997–1003.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0450997George L. Flickinger Response of the testes to social interaction among grouped chickens, General and Comparative Endocrinology 6, no.11 (Feb 1966): 89–98.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(66)90110-9R.D. Crawford, J. Robert Smyth Social and Sexual Behavior as Related to Plumage Pattern in the Fayoumi Fowl, Poultry Science 43, no.55 (Sep 1964): 1193–1199.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0431193Jacques Gervet Étude de l'effet de groupe sur la ponte dans la société polygyne dePolistes gallicus L. (Hymen. Vesp.), Insectes Sociaux 9, no.33 (Sep 1962): 231–263.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02329895George L. Flickinger Effect of grouping on adrenals and gonads of chickens, General and Comparative Endocrinology 1, no.44 (Oct 1961): 332–340.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(61)90051-XRobert Schloeth Das Sozialleben des Camargue-Rindes, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 18, no.55 (Apr 2010): 574–627.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1961.tb00243.xA.M. Guhl The Effects of Acquaintance Between the Sexes on Sexual Behavior in White Leghorns, Poultry Science 40, no.11 (Jan 1961): 10–21.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0400010Masao Kawai A field experiment on the process of group formation in the Japanese monkey (Macaca fuscata), and the releasing of the group at Ôhirayama, Primates 2, no.22 (Sep 1960): 181–255.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01659168A.M. Guhl, J.V. Craig, C.D. Mueller Selective Breeding for Aggressiveness in Chickens, Poultry Science 39, no.44 (Jul 1960): 970–980.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0390970Gayner R. McDaniel, J.V. Craig Behavior Traits, Semen Measurements and Fertility of White Leghorn Males , ,, Poultry Science 38, no.55 (Sep 1959): 1005–1014.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0381005Steven C. King, David F. Bray Competition Between Strains of Chickens in Separate Versus Intermingled Flocks, Poultry Science 38, no.11 (Jan 1959): 86–94.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0380086P.B. Siegel Evidence of a Genetic Basis for Aggressiveness and Sex Drive in the White Plymouth Rock Cock, Poultry Science 38, no.11 (Jan 1959): 115–118.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0380115Cletis Williams, W.H. McGibbon The Relationship Between the Various Mating Activities of the Female Domestic Fowl, Poultry Science 37, no.33 (May 1958): 515–519.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0370515D.G.M. Wood-Gush The effect of experience on the mating behaviour of the domestic cock, Animal Behaviour 6, no.1-21-2 (Jan 1958): 68–71.https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(58)90010-1D.G.M. Wood-Gush Fecundity and Sexual Receptivity in the Brown Leghorn Female, Poultry Science 37, no.11 (Jan 1958): 30–33.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0370030WILLIAM C. YOUNG Genetic and Psychological Determinants of Sexual Behavior Patterns11A number of the investigations described in this review were aided by research grants M-504, M-504 (C-C3) from the National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service, and by grants from the Committee for Research in Problems of Sex, National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council., (Jan 1957): 75–98.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-395494-7.50008-7D.G.M. Wood-Gush Aggression and sexual activity in the brown leghorn cock, The British Journal of Animal Behaviour 5, no.11 (Jan 1957): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-5601(57)80037-9Cletis Williams, W.H. McGibbon The Relationship of the Various Mating Behavior Activities of the Male Domestic Fowl, Poultry Science 36, no.11 (Jan 1957): 30–33.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0360030D.G.M. Wood-Gush, R. Osborne A study of differences in the sex drive of cockerels, The British Journal of Animal Behaviour 4, no.33 (Jul 1956): 102–110.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-5601(56)80130-5John A. King Sexual Behavior of C57BL/10 Mice and its Relation to Early Social Experience, The Journal of Genetic Psychology 88, no.22 (Jun 1956): 223–229.https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.1956.10532973Cletis Williams, W.H. McGibbon Courtship Behavior of the Male Domestic Fowl, Gallus Domesticus, Poultry Science 34, no.55 (Sep 1955): 1172–1173.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0341172D.G.M. Wood-Gush The behaviour of the domestic chicken: A review of the literature, The British Journal of Animal Behaviour 3, no.33 (Jul 1955): 81–110.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-5601(55)80001-9Nicholas E. Collias, Richard D. Taber A Field Study of Some Grouping and Dominance Relations in Ring-Necked Pheasants, The Condor 53, no.66 (Nov 1951): 265–275.https://doi.org/10.2307/1364987A.M. Guhl Measurable Differences in Mating Behavior of Cocks, Poultry Science 30, no.55 (Sep 1951): 687–693.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0300687N. E. Collias SOCIAL LIFE AND THE INDIVIDUAL AMONG VERTEBRATE ANIMALS, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 51, no.66 (Nov 1950): 1074–1092.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1950.tb27336.x L. V. Domm , and David E. Davis The Sexual Behavior of Intersexual Domestic Fowl, Physiological Zoology 21, no.11 (Sep 2015): 14–31.https://doi.org/10.1086/physzool.21.1.30151977A.M. Guhl, D.C. Warren Number of Offspring Sired by Cockerels Related to Social Dominance in Chickens, Poultry Science 25, no.55 (Sep 1946): 460–472.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0250460
Publication Year: 1945
Publication Date: 1945-10-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 120
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot