Title: Free of Detachment: Logic, Rationality, and Gluts
Abstract: NoûsVolume 49, Issue 2 p. 410-423 ARTICLE Free of Detachment: Logic, Rationality, and Gluts Jc Beall, Jc Beall University of ConnecticutSearch for more papers by this author Jc Beall, Jc Beall University of ConnecticutSearch for more papers by this author First published: 08 May 2013 https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12029Citations: 44Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References 1Alan Ross Anderson and Nuel D. Belnap. Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, volume 1. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975. 2Alan Ross Anderson, Nuel D. Belnap, and J. Michael Dunn. Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, volume 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1992. 3F. G. Asenjo. A calculus of antinomies. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 7(1): 103– 105, 1966. 4F. G. Asenjo. Towards an antinomic mathematics. In Graham Priest, Richard Routley, and Jean Norman, editors, Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, pages 394– 414. Philosophia Verlag, 1989. 5F. G. Asenjo and J. Tamburino. Logic of antinomies. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 16(1): 17– 44, 1975. 6Jc Beall. Spandrels of Truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2009. 7Jc Beall. Multiple-conclusion LP and default classicality. Review of Symbolic Logic, 4(2): 326– 336, 2011. 8Jc Beall. LP+, K3+, FDE+ and their classical collapse. Review of Symbolic Logic, 2013. Forthcoming. 9Jc Beall, Ross Brady, Michael Dunn, Allen Hazen, Edwin Mares, John Slaney, Robert K. Meyer, Graham Priest, Greg Restall, David Ripley, and Richard Sylvan. On the ternary relation and conditionality. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 41(3): 595– 612, 2012. 10Jc Beall, Ross Brady, Alan Hazen, Graham Priest, and Greg Restall. Relevant restricted quantification. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 35(6): 587– 598, 2006. 11Jc Beall, Thomas Forster, and Jeremy Seligman. A note on freedom from detachment in the Logic of Paradox. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 2011. Forthcoming. 12N. D. Belnap. Restricted quantification and conditional assertion. In Truth, Syntax, and Modality. North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1973. 13N. D. Belnap. A useful four-valued logic. In Modern Uses of Multiple-Valued Logic. D. Reidel, 1977. 14Nuel D. Belnap. How a computer should think. In G. Ryle, editor, Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy. Oriel Press, 1977. 15Nuel D. Belnap and J. Michael Dunn. Entailment and the disjunctive syllogism. In F. Fløistad and G. H. Wright, editors, Philosophy of Language/Philosophical Logic, pages 337– 366. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1973. Reprinted in [2, §80]. 16Katalin Bimbó and J. Michael Dunn. Generalized Galois Logics. Relational Semantics of Nonclassical Logical Calculi, volume 188 of CSLI Lecture Notes. CSLI Publications, Stanford, 2008. 17Ross Brady. Universal Logic, volume 109. CSLI Lecture Notes, Stanford, CA, 2006. 18A. G. Burgess and J. P. Burgess. Truth. Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy. Princeton University Press, 2011. 19Sam Butchart. Binary quantifiers for relevant paraconsistent logic. To appear. Presented at the Australasian Association for Philosophy conference in Melbourne, 2008., 2008. 20J. Michael Dunn. The Algebra of Intensional Logics. PhD thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 1966. 21J. Michael Dunn. Natural language versus formal language. Presented at the joint apa–asl symposium, New York, December 27, 1969. 22J. Michael Dunn. Intuitive semantics for first-degree entailments and 'coupled trees'. Philosophical Studies, 29: 149– 168, 1976. 23J. Michael Dunn and Greg Restall. Relevance logic. In Dov M. Gabbay and Franz Günthner, editors, Handbook of Philosophical Logic (2nd Edition), volume 6. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 2002. 24Matti Eklund. Deep inconsistency. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 80(3): 321– 331, 2002. 25Matti Eklund. Reply to Priest and Beall. Australasian Journal of Logic, 6: 94– 106, 2008. 26Hartry Field. Saving Truth from Paradox. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2008. 27Anil Gupta and Nuel Belnap. The Revision Theory of Truth. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993. 28Gilbert Harman. Rationality. In Reasoning, meaning, and mind, pages 9– 45. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1973. 29Gilbert Harman. Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986. 30John F. Horty. Non-monotonic logic. In L. Goble, editor, The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic, pages 336– 361. Blackwell, Oxford, 2001. 31Edwin Mares. Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004. 32Edwin D. Mares and Robert K. Meyer. Relevant logics. In Lou Goble, editor, The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic. Blackwell, Oxford, 2001. 33Robert K. Meyer, Richard Routley, and J. Michael Dunn. Curry's paradox. Analysis, 39: 124– 128, 1979. 34Sara Negri and Jan von Plato. Structural proof theory. Cambridge University Press, 2001. 35Graham Priest. The logic of paradox. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 219– 241, 1979. 36Graham Priest. In Contradiction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, second edition, 2006. First printed by Martinus Nijhoff in 1987. 37Graham Priest, Jc Beall, and B. Armour-Garb, editors. The Law of Non-Contradiction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004. 38Graham Priest and Richard Routley. The history of paraconsistent logic. In Graham Priest, Richard Routley, and Jean Norman, editors, Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, page Chapter 1. Philosophia Verlag, 1989. 39Graham Priest and Richard Routley. Systems of paraconsistent logic. In Graham Priest, Richard Routley, and Jean Norman, editors, Paraconsistent Logic: Essays on the Inconsistent, pages 151– 186. Philosophia Verlag, 1989. 40Graham Priest and Richard Sylvan. Simplified semantics for basic relevant logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 21: 217– 232, 1992. 41Willard van Orman Quine. Philosophy of Logic. Prentice-Hall, 1970. 42Stephen Read. Relevant Logic. Oxford, Blackwell, 1988. 43Greg Restall. Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals). Journal of Philosophical Logic, 22: 481– 511, 1993. 44Greg Restall. Multiple conclusions. In Petr Hájek, Luis Valdes-Villanueva, and Dag Westerstahl, editors, Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science: Proceedings of the Twelth International Congress, pages 189– 205. King's College Publications, 2005. 45David Ripley. Paradoxes and failures of cut. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2011. Forthcoming. 46Richard Routley. Dialectical logic, semantics and metamathematics. Erkenntnis, 14: 301– 331, 1979. 47Richard Routley, Val Plumwood, Robert K. Meyer, and Ross T. Brady, editors. Relevant Logics and their Rivals. Ridgeview, 1982. 48D. J. Shoesmith and T. J. Smiley. Multiple-conclusion logic. Reprint of the 1978 hardback ed. Cambridge University Press, 2009. 49Alfred Tarski. Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics: papers from 1923 to 1938. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1956. Translated by J. H. Woodger. 50Alasdair Urquhart. Semantics for relevant logics. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 37: 159– 169, 1972. 51Zach Weber. Extensionality and restriction in naive set theory. Studia Logica, 94(1), 2010. Citing Literature Volume49, Issue2June 2015Pages 410-423 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Publication Year: 2013
Publication Date: 2013-05-08
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 115
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot