Title: Biomedical Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop II: Report and Recommendations
Abstract: HomeRadiologyVol. 236, No. 2 PreviousNext ArticlesSpecial ReportsBiomedical Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop II: Report and RecommendationsC. Leon Partain, Heang-Ping Chan, Juri G. Gelovani, Maryellen L. Giger, Joseph A. Izatt, Ferenc A. Jolesz, Krishna Kandarpa, King C. P. Li, Michael McNitt-Gray, Sandy Napel, Ronald M. Summers, G. Scott GazelleC. Leon Partain, Heang-Ping Chan, Juri G. Gelovani, Maryellen L. Giger, Joseph A. Izatt, Ferenc A. Jolesz, Krishna Kandarpa, King C. P. Li, Michael McNitt-Gray, Sandy Napel, Ronald M. Summers, G. Scott GazelleAuthor Affiliations1From the Dept of Radiology, Vanderbilt Univ Medical Ctr, RR-1223, MCN, 1161 21st Ave South, Nashville, TN 37232-2675 (C.L.P.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor (H.P.C.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Ctr, Houston (J.G.G.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Chicago, Ill (M.L.G.); Dept of Radiology, Duke Univ Medical Ctr, Durham, NC (J.A.I.); Dept of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hosp, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (F.A.J.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (K.K.); Imaging Sciences Program, NIH, Bethesda, Md (K.C.P.L.); Dept of Radiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (M.M.G.); Dept of Radiology, Stanford Univ School of Medicine, Calif (S.N.); Diagnostic Radiology Dept, NIH, Bethesda, Md (R.M.S.); and Inst for Technology Assessment and Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, Harvard Medical School, Boston, and Dept of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (G.S.G.). Supported in part by grants from NIBIB (1 R13 EB003553-01) and the Whitaker Foundation. Received Nov 4, 2004; revision requested Dec 13; revision received Jan 23, 2005; accepted Feb 1.Address correspondence to C.L.P. (e-mail: [email protected]).C. Leon PartainHeang-Ping ChanJuri G. GelovaniMaryellen L. GigerJoseph A. IzattFerenc A. JoleszKrishna KandarpaKing C. P. LiMichael McNitt-GraySandy NapelRonald M. SummersG. Scott GazellePublished Online:Aug 1 2005https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2362041876MoreSectionsFull textPDF ToolsImage ViewerAdd to favoritesCiteTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked In References1 Carson PL, Giger M, Welch MJ, et al. Biomedical Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop: report and recommendations. Radiology 2003; 229:328–339. Link, Google Scholar2 Summers RM. Road maps for advancement of radiologic computer-aided detection in the 21st century. Radiology 2003; 229:11–13. Link, Google Scholar3 Cancer statistics presentation 2004. American Cancer Society. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/pro/content/pro_1_1_Cancer_Statistics_2004_presentation.asp. Google Scholar4 Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220:781–786. Link, Google Scholar5 Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE, et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96:185–190. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6 Helvie MA, Hadjiiski L, Makariou E, et al. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. Radiology 2004; 231:208–214. Link, Google Scholar7 Giger ML. Computer-aided diagnosis. In: Haus AG, Yaffe MJ, eds. 1993 Syllabus: a categorical course in physics—technical aspects of mammography. 2nd ed. Oak Brook, Ill: Radiological Society of North America, 1993; 283–298. Google Scholar8 Giger ML, Huo Z, Kupinski MA, Vyborny CJ. Computer-aided diagnosis in mammography. In: Sonka M, Fitzpatrick MJ, eds. Handbook of medical imaging. Vol 2, Medical imaging processing and analysis. Bellingham, Wash: SPIE–The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2000; 915–1004. Google Scholar9 Vyborny CJ, Giger ML. Computer vision and artificial intelligence in mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:699–708. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar10 Giger ML. Computerized image analysis in breast cancer detection and diagnosis. In: Seminars in breast disease. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 2002; 199–210. Google Scholar11 Beam CA, Layde PM, Sullivan DC. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists: findings from a national sample. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:209–213. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar12 Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Toledano AY, Doi K. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology 2001; 220:787–794. Link, Google Scholar13 Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC 3rd, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1496–1503. [Published correction appears in N Engl J Med 2000; 342:524.] Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar14 Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:2191–2200. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar15 Johnson CD, Toledano AY, Herman BA, et al. Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology 2003; 125:688–695. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar16 Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR. Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 2001; 219:685–692. Link, Google Scholar17 Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 2000; 216:704–711. Link, Google Scholar18 Summers RM, Yoshida H. Future directions: computer-aided diagnosis. In: Dachman AH, ed. Atlas of virtual colonoscopy. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2003; 55–62. Google Scholar19 Summers RM, Beaulieu CF, Pusanik LM, et al. Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology 2000; 216:284–290. Link, Google Scholar20 Yoshida H, Nappi J. Three-dimensional computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of colonic polyps. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20:1261–1274. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar21 Paik DS, Beaulieu CF, Rubin GD, et al. Surface normal overlap: a computer-aided detection algorithm with application to colonic polyps and lung nodules in helical CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004; 23:661–675. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar22 Paik DS, Beaulieu CF, Mani A, Prokesch RW, Yee J, Napel S. Evaluation of computer-aided detection in CT colonography: potential applicability to a screening population (abstr). Radiology 2001; 221(P):332. Link, Google Scholar23 Yoshida H, Nappi J, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:963–979. Link, Google Scholar24 Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM, Malley JD, Youssef AM, Reed JE. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 2001; 219:51–59. Link, Google Scholar25 Kiss G, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Thomeer M, Suetens P, Marchal G. Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:77–81. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar26 Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M, Malley JD, Johnson CD. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 2002; 225:391–399. Link, Google Scholar27 Summers RM. Challenges for computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002; 27:268–274. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar28 Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003; 53:5–26. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar29 Kaneko M, Eguchi K, Ohmatsu H, et al. Peripheral lung cancer: screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography. Radiology 1996; 201:798–802. Link, Google Scholar30 Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354:99–105. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar31 Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. Lung cancer screening with CT: Mayo Clinic experience. Radiology 2003; 226:756–761. Link, Google Scholar32 Hillman BJ; ACRIN. Economic, legal, and ethical rationales for the ACRIN national lung screening trial of CT screening for lung cancer. Acad Radiol 2003; 10:349–350. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar33 Rubin GD. Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol 2000; 36:74–80. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar34 Naidich DP. Helical computed tomography of the thorax: clinical applications. Radiol Clin North Am 1994; 32:759–774. Medline, Google Scholar35 Giger ML, Bae KT, MacMahon H. Computerized detection of pulmonary nodules in computed tomography images. Invest Radiol 1994; 29:459–465. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar36 Armato SG 3rd, Giger ML, MacMahon H. Automated detection of lung nodules in CT scans: preliminary results. Med Phys 2001; 28:1552–1561. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar37 Brown MS, McNitt-Gray MF, Goldin JG, Suh RD, Sayre JW, Aberle DR. Patient-specific models for lung nodule detection and surveillance in CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20:1242–1250. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar38 Lee Y, Hara T, Fujita H, Itoh S, Ishigaki T. Automated detection of pulmonary nodules in helical CT images based on an improved template-matching technique. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20:595–604. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar39 Gurcan MN, Sahiner B, Petrick N, et al. Lung nodule detection on thoracic computed tomography images: preliminary evaluation of a computer-aided diagnosis system. Med Phys 2002; 29:2552–2558. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar40 Ko JP, Betke M. Chest CT: automated nodule detection and assessment of change over time—preliminary experience. Radiology 2001; 218:267–273. Link, Google Scholar41 Kostis WJ, Reeves AP, Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. Three-dimensional segmentation and growth-rate estimation of small pulmonary nodules in helical CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003; 22:1259–1274. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar42 Cavouras D, Prassopoulos P, Pantelidis N. Image analysis methods for solitary pulmonary nodule characterization by computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 1992; 14:169–172. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar43 Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mateescu I, Brettle DW, Rainey TG, Weingard FS. Neural networks for the analysis of small pulmonary nodules. Clin Imaging 1997; 21:390–399. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar44 Kawata Y, Niki N, Ohmatsu H, Moriyama N. Example-based assisting approach for pulmonary nodule classification in three-dimensional thoracic computed tomography images. Acad Radiol 2003; 10:1402–1415. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar45 McNitt-Gray MF, Hart EM, Wyckoff N, Sayre JW, Goldin JG, Aberle DR. A pattern classification approach to characterizing solitary pulmonary nodules imaged on high resolution CT: preliminary results. Med Phys 1999; 26:880–888. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar46 Armato SG 3rd, Altman MB, Wilkie J, et al. Automated lung nodule classification following automated nodule detection on CT: a serial approach. Med Phys 2003; 30:1188–1197. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar47 Armato SG 3rd, McLennan G, McNitt-Gray MF, et al. Lung Image Database Consortium: developing a resource for the medical imaging research community. Radiology 2004; 232:739–748. Link, Google Scholar48 Metz CE. ROC methodology in radiologic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:720–733. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar49 Obuchowski NA. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003; 229:3–8. Link, Google Scholar50 Bunch C, Hamilton JF, Sanderson GK, Simmons AH. A free response approach to the measurement and characterization of radiographic-observer performance. J Appl Photogr Eng 1978; 4:166–172. Google Scholar51 Chakraborty DP. Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) data. Med Phys 1989; 16:561–568. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar52 Chakraborty DP, Winter LH. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology 1990; 174:873–881. Link, Google Scholar53 Chakraborty D. Statistical power in observer-performance studies: comparison of the receiver operating characteristic and free-response methods in tasks involving localization. Acad Radiol 2002; 9:147–156. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar54 Arbab AS, Yocum GT, Kalish H, et al. Efficient magnetic cell labeling with protamine sulfate complexed to ferumoxides for cellular MRI. Blood 2004; 104:1217–1223. Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarArticle HistoryPublished in print: Aug 2005 FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByAn approach for chest tube detection in chest radiographsCem AhmetMercan, Mustafa SerdarCelebi2014 | IET Image Processing, Vol. 8, No. 2Disease-Specific Target Gene Expression Profiling of Molecular Imaging Probes: Database Development and Clinical ValidationLawrence Wing-ChiChan, Connie Hiu-ChingNgo, FengfengWang, Moss Y.Zhao, MengyingZhao, Helen Ka-WaiLaw, Sze Chuen CesarWong, Benjamin Yat-MingYung2014 | Molecular Imaging, Vol. 13, No. 6Magnetic Resonance Imaging–guided Endovascular Interventions—Are We There Yet?KrishnaKandarpa2013 | Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 24, No. 6An Image Processing Tool for Efficient Feature Extraction in Computer-Aided Detection SystemsOmer M.Soysal, JianhuaChen, HelmutSchneider2010Aug1digital Encyclopedia of Applied PhysicsWilliam R.Hendee, Anthony B.Wolbarst2009Fractal-based brain tumor detection in multimodal MRIKhan M.Iftekharuddin, JingZheng, Mohammad A.Islam, Robert J.Ogg2009 | Applied Mathematics and Computation, Vol. 207, No. 1Molecular Imaging: A Primer for Interventionalists and ImagersDavid S.Wang, Michael D.Dake, Jinha M.Park, Michael D.Kuo2009 | Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 20, No. 7CT Colonography: A Systematic Review of Standard of Reporting for Studies of Computer-aided Detection1Charlotte Robinson, , Steve Halligan, , Stuart A. Taylor, , Susan Mallett, , and Douglas G. Altman, 1 February 2008 | Radiology, Vol. 246, No. 2Effect of a Computer-aided Diagnosis System on Clinicians’ Performance in Detection of Small Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage on Computed TomographyTaoChan, H.K.Huang2008 | Academic Radiology, Vol. 15, No. 3Special Report: Biomedical Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop IV—A Summary of Findings and Recommendations1William R. Hendee, 1 February 2007 | Radiology, Vol. 242, No. 2Building Research Programs in Diagnostic Radiology Part II. Basic Research1James H. Thrall, 1 February 2007 | Radiology, Vol. 242, No. 2Biomedical imaging research opportunities workshop IV: A white paperWilliam R.Hendee, FilipBanovac, Paul L.Carson, Ralph A.DeFronzo, William C.Eckelman, Gary D.Fullerton, Steven M.Larson, GordonMcLennan, Michael J.Welch2007 | Medical Physics, Vol. 34, No. 2Biomedical Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop III: Summary of Findings and Recommendations1William R. Hendee, 1 February 2006 | Radiology, Vol. 238, No. 2Evolving and Experimental Technologies in Medical Imaging1Anthony B. Wolbarst, , and William R. Hendee, 1 January 2006 | Radiology, Vol. 238, No. 1Quantitative Bildgebung bei rheumatoider Arthritis: Vom Scoring zur MessungP.Peloschek, G.Langs, A.Valentinitsch, M.Bubale, T.Schlager, C.Müller-Mang, F.Kainberger2006 | Der Radiologe, Vol. 46, No. 5Special Report: Biomedical Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop IV. A Summary of Findings and RecommendationsWilliamHendee2006 | Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 34, No. 10Biomedical Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop II: Report and RecommendationsC.D.Maynard2006Jan1 | Yearbook of Diagnostic Radiology, Vol. 2006Molecular Imaging: A Primer for Interventionalists and ImagersDavid S.Wang, Michael D.Dake, Jinha M.Park, Michael D.Kuo2006 | Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Vol. 17, No. 9Special Report: Biomedical Imaging Research Opportunities Workshop III. A Summary of Findings and RecommendationsWilliam R.Hendee2006 | Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 2Recommended Articles Importance of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for Detection of CancerRadiology2022Volume: 303Issue: 1pp. 200-201US Molecular Imaging Sensitively Captures Acute Ileitis Therapy ResponseRadiology2018Volume: 289Issue: 1pp. 101-102Invited Commentary on “Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer”RadioGraphics2016Volume: 36Issue: 1pp. 159-161Trainee Research Prizes from the 2015 RSNA Scientific Assembly and Annual MeetingRadiology2016Volume: 279Issue: 1pp. 1-4Trainee Research Prizes from the 2018 RSNA Scientific Assembly and Annual MeetingRadiology2019Volume: 290Issue: 3pp. 585-588See More RSNA Education Exhibits Assessing Immunotherapy with Functional and Molecular Imaging and Radiomics: Whence and WitherDigital Posters2019PET CT-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy: Review Of Technique And Its ValueDigital Posters2021Radiogenomics In Lung Cancer: New Approaches Toward Diagnosis And Treatment In The Precision Medicine EraDigital Posters2021 RSNA Case Collection Esophageal Fibrovascular PolypRSNA Case Collection2022Endometrial PolypsRSNA Case Collection2020Pseudoprogression with Immunotherapy Treatment RSNA Case Collection2021 Vol. 236, No. 2 Metrics Altmetric Score PDF download
Publication Year: 2005
Publication Date: 2005-08-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref', 'pubmed']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 34
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot