Abstract: Journal of Engineering EducationVolume 94, Issue 1 p. 7-10 A New Journal for a Field in Transition Richard M. Felder, Richard M. Felder North Carolina State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorSheri D. Sheppard, Sheri D. Sheppard Stanford UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorKarl A. Smith, Karl A. Smith University of MinnesotaSearch for more papers by this author Richard M. Felder, Richard M. Felder North Carolina State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorSheri D. Sheppard, Sheri D. Sheppard Stanford UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorKarl A. Smith, Karl A. Smith University of MinnesotaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 02 January 2013 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00824.xCitations: 27AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References 1 National Academy of Engineering, The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004. 2 National Center for Education Statistics, The Condition of Education 1995, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Education, June 1995. 3 U.S. Department of Labor, “College Enrollment and Work Activity of 2003 High School Graduates,” USDL 04–749, Washington, D.C.: April 27, 2004. 4 Diamond, R.M., “The Forces for Change in Higher Education and Their Implications for Schools and Colleges of Engineering,” Address to the Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Engineering Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education, Savannah, Ga., October 20, 2004. 5 Wankat, P.C., Felder, R.M., Smith, K.A., and Oreovicz, F., “The Engineering Approach to the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,” in M.T Huber & S. Morreale (Eds.), Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2002. 6 Colorado School of Mines, “Rigorous Research in Engineering Education: Creating a Community of Practice,” http:www.mines.eduresearchceeND.html. 7 Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education, http:www.engr.washington.educaeeresearch_elements.html. 8 Diamond R., and Adam, B., Recognizing Faculty Work: Reward Systems for the Year 2000, San Francisco, Cal.: Jossey-Bass, 1993. 9 Diamond, R., “The Mission-Driven Faculty Reward System,” in R.M. Diamond (ed.), Field Guide to Academic Leadership, San Francisco, Cal.: Jossey-Bass, 2002. 10 Lewin, K., Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers, New York, N.Y.: Harper & Row, 1951, p. 169. 11 Sullivan, W.M., Work and Integrity: The Crisis and Promise of Professionalism in America, San Francisco, Cal.: Jossey-Bass, 2005. 12 Sheppard, S.D., Sullivan, W.M., Colby, A., and Macatangay, K., Educating Engineers, San Francisco, Cal.: Jossey-Bass, 2005, in press. 13 Huber, M.T., Balancing Acts: The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Academic Careers, Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education and The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2004. Citing Literature Volume94, Issue1January 2005Pages 7-10 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Publication Year: 2005
Publication Date: 2005-01-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 70
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot