Title: The institution of presidency in the Central Asian countries: personalization vs. institutionalization
Abstract: This article is part of the Grant of the President of the Russian Federation in support of young Russian scientists (grant MK-320.2011.60). M democracy, while the parliamentary (or parliamentarized semi-presidential form) leads to stronger democracy. I have already written that today political institutionalization and consolidation of political regimes pose a greater challenge for the Soviet successor-states than making the transition from authoritarianism to democracy. In other words, they must achieve political stability and manageability. None of the post-Soviet political regimes of the CIS countries can be described as a consoluch has been written about the institution of presidency and its traps, which are especially dangerous in political regimes undergoing transition. Some authors agree that during transition to a new regime, the presidential form of government (as an alternative to deposed dictatorship) makes it harder to consolidate
Publication Year: 2011
Publication Date: 2011-01-01
Language: en
Type: article
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 1
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot