Title: Democratic Juridification Without Statisation: Law of Conflict of Laws Instead of a World State
Abstract:For some time now, conceptual designs for statal unity over and above the nation state have been discussed not only in theory but also in politics, as a panacea for the problems faced by the old natio...For some time now, conceptual designs for statal unity over and above the nation state have been discussed not only in theory but also in politics, as a panacea for the problems faced by the old nation state in view of globalisation. This paper begins by restating a powerful criticism of this idea from a perspective of radical democracy articulated by Ingeborg Maus. However, if her point is taken seriously, transnational constitutional theory must develop an alternative to the nation state to cope with transnationalisation. The paper argues for a democracy-preserving ‘law of conflict of laws’. But, as an analysis of the changed function of conflict of laws will show, such a conception has been marginal in conflict of laws as a legal discipline. Today, conflict of laws in its hegemonic articulation is even evolving towards becoming an anti-democratic tool to accelerate the commodification of the legal function.Read More
Publication Year: 2011
Publication Date: 2011-07-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 36
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot