Title: The Interrelations of Inversions, Heterosis and Recombination
Abstract: Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Interrelations of Inversions, Heterosis and RecombinationA. H. Sturtevant, and K. MatherA. H. Sturtevant, and K. MatherPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 72, Number 742Sep. - Oct., 1938 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/280797 Views: 12Total views on this site Citations: 50Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Tim Connallon, Colin Olito Natural selection and the distribution of chromosomal inversion lengths, Molecular Ecology 31, no.1313 (Aug 2021): 3627–3641.https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16091Anastasia V Stolyarova, Tatiana V Neretina, Elena A Zvyagina, Anna V Fedotova, Alexey Kondrashov, Georgii A. Bazykin Complex fitness landscape shapes variation in a hyperpolymorphic species, eLife 11 (May 2022).https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76073K. Beth Watson, Sarah J. Lehnert, Paul Bentzen, Tony Kess, Antony Einfeldt, Steven Duffy, Ben Perriman, Sigbjørn Lien, Matthew Kent, Ian R. Bradbury Environmentally associated chromosomal structural variation influences fine‐scale population structure of Atlantic Salmon ( Salmo salar ), Molecular Ecology 31, no.44 (Dec 2021): 1057–1075.https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16307Esra Durmaz, Envel Kerdaffrec, Georgios Katsianis, Martin Kapun, Thomas Flatt How Selection Acts on Chromosomal Inversions, (Sep 2020): 307–315.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0028745Maren Wellenreuther, Claire Mérot, Emma Berdan, Louis Bernatchez Going beyond SNPs: The role of structural genomic variants in adaptive evolution and species diversification, Molecular Ecology 28, no.66 (Apr 2019): 1203–1209.https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15066Alexey S. Kondrashov Through Sex, Nature Is Telling Us Something Important, Trends in Genetics 34, no.55 (May 2018): 352–361.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2018.01.003Erik Lavington, Andrew D Kern The Effect of Common Inversion Polymorphisms In(2L)t and In(3R)Mo on Patterns of Transcriptional Variation in Drosophila melanogaster, G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 7, no.1111 (Nov 2017): 3659–3668.https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.1133Ulrich Knief, Wolfgang Forstmeier, Yifan Pei, Malika Ihle, Daiping Wang, Katrin Martin, Pavlína Opatová, Jana Albrechtová, Michael Wittig, Andre Franke, Tomáš Albrecht, Bart Kempenaers A sex-chromosome inversion causes strong overdominance for sperm traits that affect siring success, Nature Ecology & Evolution 1, no.88 (Jul 2017): 1177–1184.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0236-1M. Wellenreuther, H. Rosenquist, P. Jaksons, K. W. Larson Local adaptation along an environmental cline in a species with an inversion polymorphism, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30, no.66 (May 2017): 1068–1077.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13064Ulrich Knief, Georg Hemmrich-Stanisak, Michael Wittig, Andre Franke, Simon C. Griffith, Bart Kempenaers, Wolfgang Forstmeier Fitness consequences of polymorphic inversions in the zebra finch genome, Genome Biology 17, no.11 (Sep 2016).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1056-3Young Wha Lee, Lila Fishman, John K Kelly, John H Willis A Segregating Inversion Generates Fitness Variation in Yellow Monkeyflower ( Mimulus guttatus ), Genetics 202, no.44 (Feb 2016): 1473–1484.https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.183566Alexander E. Lobkovsky, Yuri I. Wolf, Eugene V. Koonin Evolvability of an Optimal Recombination Rate, Genome Biology and Evolution 8, no.11 (Dec 2015): 70–77.https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv249Ehud Lamm Systems Thinking Versus Population Thinking: Genotype Integration and Chromosomal Organization 1930s–1950s, Journal of the History of Biology 48, no.44 (Feb 2015): 641–677.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-015-9400-0Pranveer Singh Chromosomal Aberrations in Drosophila ananassae, (Jan 2015): 91–102.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2565-2_6Amy L. Dapper, Curtis M. Lively INTERLOCUS SEXUALLY ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION CAN CREATE INDIRECT SELECTION FOR INCREASED RECOMBINATION, Evolution 68, no.44 (Feb 2014): 1216–1224.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12338Mark Kirkpatrick How and Why Chromosome Inversions Evolve, PLoS Biology 8, no.99 (Sep 2010): e1000501.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000501Marcel Salathé, Roger D. Kouyos, and Sebastian Bonhoeffer On the Causes of Selection for Recombination Underlying the Red Queen Hypothesis. M. Salathé et al., The American Naturalist 174, no.S1S1 (Jul 2015): S31–S42.https://doi.org/10.1086/599085Sylvain Gandon, Sarah P Otto The Evolution of Sex and Recombination in Response to Abiotic or Coevolutionary Fluctuations in Epistasis, Genetics 175, no.44 (Apr 2007): 1835–1853.https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.066399Mark Kirkpatrick, Nick Barton Chromosome Inversions, Local Adaptation and Speciation, Genetics 173, no.11 (May 2006): 419–434.https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.047985Mark M Iles, Kevin Walters, Chris Cannings Recombination Can Evolve in Large Finite Populations Given Selection on Sufficient Loci, Genetics 165, no.44 (Dec 2003): 2249–2258.https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/165.4.2249John A. Birdsell, Christopher Wills The Evolutionary Origin and Maintenance of Sexual Recombination: A Review of Contemporary Models, (Jan 2003): 27–138.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5190-1_2Laurie A. Dries PEERING THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS AT A SEXUAL PARASITE: ARE AMAZON MOLLIES RED QUEENS?, Evolution 57, no.66 (Jan 2003): 1387.https://doi.org/10.1554/02-591Katrina A. Lythgoe THE COEVOLUTION OF PARASITES WITH HOST-ACQUIRED IMMUNITY AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEX, Evolution 54, no.44 (Jan 2000): 1142.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1142:TCOPWH]2.0.CO;2 West, Lively, Read A pluralist approach to sex and recombination, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12, no.66 (Nov 1999): 1003–1012.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00119.xSarah Perin Otto, Marcus W. Feldman Deleterious Mutations, Variable Epistatic Interactions, and the Evolution of Recombination, Theoretical Population Biology 51, no.22 (Apr 1997): 134–147.https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.1997.1301N. H. Barton A general model for the evolution of recombination, Genetical Research 65, no.22 (Apr 2009): 123–144.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300033140Akira Sasaki, Stephen Ellner THE EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE PHENOTYPE DISTRIBUTION IN A RANDOM ENVIRONMENT, Evolution 49, no.22 (May 2017): 337–350.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02246.xJames F. Crow H. J. Muller's Role in Evolutionary Biology, (Jan 1992): 83–105.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2856-8_5Ilan Eshel Game Theory and Population Dynamics in Complex Genetical Systems: The Role of Sex in Short Term and in Long Term Evolution, (Jan 1991): 6–28.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02674-8_3Sean Nee Antagonistic co-evolution and the evolution of genotypic randomization, Journal of Theoretical Biology 140, no.44 (Oct 1989): 499–518.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80111-0Brian Charlesworth The evolution of sex and recombination, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 4, no.99 (Sep 1989): 264–267.https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(89)90196-1 Bruce Wallace One Selectionist's Perspective, The Quarterly Review of Biology 64, no.22 (Oct 2015): 127–145.https://doi.org/10.1086/416236M. Santos The role of genic selection in the establishment of inversion polymorphism in Drosophila subobscura, Genetica 69, no.11 (Mar 1986): 35–45.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122932J Maynard Smith The evolution of recombination, Journal of Genetics 64, no.2-32-3 (Dec 1985): 159–171.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02931144R K Butlin, T H Day Genie and karyotypic selection on an inversion polymorphism in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida, Heredity 54, no.22 (Apr 1985): 267–274.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1985.36Russell Lande THE EXPECTED FIXATION RATE OF CHROMOSOMAL INVERSIONS, Evolution 38, no.44 (May 2017): 743–752.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00347.xBrian Charlesworth, Deborah Charlesworth Selection of new inversions in multi-locus genetic systems, Genetical Research 21, no.0202 (Apr 2009): 167.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300013343Dirk-Henner Lankenau The Legacy of the Germ Line – Maintaining Sex and Life in Metazoans: Cognitive Roots of the Concept of Hierarchical Selection, (): 289–339.https://doi.org/10.1007/7050_2007_030INGEMAR GUSTAVSSON CYTOGENETICS, DISTRIBUTION AND PHENOTYPIC EFFECTS OF A TRANSLOCATION IN SWEDISH CATTLE, Hereditas 63, no.1-21-2 (Sep 2009): 68–169.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1969.tb02259.xBruce Wallace Natural and radiation-induced chromosomal polymorphism in Drosophila, Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 3, no.33 (Jun 1966): 194–200.https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(66)90061-3W.F. Bodmer, P.A. Parsons Linkage and Recombination in Evolution, (Jan 1963): 1–100.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60285-0B I Hayman, Kenneth Mather The progress of inbreeding when homozygotes are at a disadvantage, Heredity 7, no.22 (Aug 1953): 165–183.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1953.25F. Mainx Die Verbreitung von Chromosomendislokationen in nat�rlichen Populationen von Liriomyza urophorina Mik, Chromosoma 4, no.11 (Jan 1950): 521–534.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00325788W. Gordon Whaley Heterosis, The Botanical Review 10, no.88 (Oct 1944): 461–498.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861125K. MATHER POLYGENIC INHERITANCE and NATURAL SELECTION, Biological Reviews 18, no.11 (Jan 1943): 32–64.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1943.tb00287.xP. C. Koller, I. A. R. S. Ahmed X-ray-induced structural changes in the chromosomes ofDrosophila pseudo-obscura, Journal of Genetics 44, no.11 (Sep 1942): 53–72.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02982767K. Mather Variation and selection of polygenic characters, Journal of Genetics 41, no.2-32-3 (Jan 1941): 159–193.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983019B. R. Nebel Chromosome structure, The Botanical Review 5, no.1111 (Nov 1939): 563–626.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02870166THEODOSIUS DOBZHANSKY EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON GENETICS OF FREE-LIVING POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA, Biological Reviews 14, no.44 (Oct 1939): 339–368.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1939.tb00847.xK. MATHER CROSSING-OVER, Biological Reviews 13, no.33 (Jul 1938): 252–292.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1938.tb00516.x
Publication Year: 1938
Publication Date: 1938-09-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 74
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot