Title: Revision of<i>Cognettia</i>(Clitellata, Enchytraeidae): re-establishment of<i>Chamaedrilus</i>and description of cryptic species in the<i>sphagnetorum</i>complex
Abstract: AbstractThe oligochaete worm, Cognettia sphagnetorum (Vejdovský, Citation1878), is widely used as a model organism in soil biology, and therefore it is important that its taxonomy is firmly established. A previous study based on both mitochondrial and nuclear genetic markers showed that this taxon is an assemblage of at least four species that do not form a monophyletic group. Also the validity of the genus Cognettia Nielsen and Christensen, Citation1959 is subject to debate, since the existence of two putative senior synonyms, Euenchytraeus Bretscher, Citation1906 and Chamaedrilus Friend, Citation1913 has been pointed out. Herein we revise the generic assignment of the species currently placed in Cognettia: two species, C. clarae Bauer, Citation1993 and C. piperi Christensen and Dózsa-Farkas, Citation1999, are transferred to Euenchytraeus, together with its type Eu. bisetosus Bretscher, Citation1906, whereas the remaining species, including Cognettia sphagnetorum, are being transferred to Chamaedrilus. Five species within the Chamaedrilus sphagnetorum complex are revised: the type species of Chamaedrilus, Ch. chlorophilus Friend, Citation1913, as well as the type species of Cognettia, Ch. sphagnetorum s. str. are redescribed, and a neotype is designated for the latter; and the cryptic species Ch. pseudosphagnetorum sp. nov. and Ch. chalupskyi sp. nov. are described as new to science and discussed against a paratype of Ch. valeriae (Dumnicka, Citation2010) comb. nov. DNA-barcodes are provided for all the named species in the complex except Ch. valeriae. A key to the species in the complex is given and the value of different somatic characters for separating and identifying species of Chamaedrilus is discussed. No morphological feature seems to distinguish Ch. sphagnetorum from Ch. pseudosphagnetorum. Thus, for a reliable identification of these species, molecular methods, e.g. DNA barcoding, are recommended.http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F840CD92-F784-429E-B4BF-3E61F6632A8DKey words: AnnelidaCognettiaDNA barcodingnew speciesnomenclatureOligochaetasoil fauna AcknowledgementsWe are indebted to Ainara Achurra, Anna Ansebo, Alexander Bär, Pierre De Wit, Kerryn Elliott, Daniel Gustafsson, Magnus Johansson, Emelie Lindqvist, Kennet Lundin, Lisa Matamoros and Jana Schenkova, for assistance in fieldwork, or in other ways providing specimens. Emma Sherlock and Tracey Heath (Natural History Museum, London) and Elżbieta Dumnicka (INCPAS) are thanked for loaning us material.Additional informationFundingFinancial support to the first author was given by Paul och Marie Berghaus donationsstiftelse, Wilhelm och Martina Lundgrens Vetenskapsfond; and to the last author by the Swedish Research Council (VR) and the Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Science and Spatial Planning (FORMAS), the Swedish Taxonomy Initiative (ArtDatabanken), the Norwegian Taxonomy Initiative (Artsdatabanken) and the Adlerbert Research Foundation.
Publication Year: 2014
Publication Date: 2014-12-23
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 27
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot