Title: The new Israeli sociologies: Designing the new orthodoxy
Abstract: Abstract Written from a “critical perspective”, four new sociologies of Israel have recently been published. This article critically reviews the strengths and weaknesses of these new books, as well as the “new orthodoxy” that they propose with regard to Israel's past and present. Keywords: Israelcritical sociologyIsrael-Palestinian conflictethnic stratificationIsrael and globalization Notes 1. How and why Israeli sociology developed as it did is discussed in H. Herzog Citation2000, and G. Yair and Noa Afloig Citation2005. 2. Key features of the ‘yishuv culture’ are elaborated in the following books and articles: Oz Almog Citation1997 The Sabra: A Portrait ; Nachman Ben Yehudah, Citation1995 The Masada Myth: Collective Memory and Mythmaking in Israel ; M. Feige Citation2004 “Identity, Ritual and Pilgrmage: The Meetings of the Israeli Exploration Society” in: Deborah Dash CitationMoore and Ilan Troen, Editors, Divergent Jewish Cultures, pp. 87-106; Nurith Gertz Citation1995 Captive of a Dream: National Myths in Israeli Culture ; and Yael Zurubavel 1995 Recovered Roots: Memory and the Making of National Tradition . 3. For more detailed analysis and comparison of the two books, see Grinberg Citation2003; Selby Citation2005; and Weingrod Citation2005. 4. Critical “Post-Zionist” viewpoints are elaborated in Uri Ram Citation1993 Editor, Israeli Society: Critical Perspectives See also Ram, Citation1995, and Silberstein Citation1993. 5. There also is a fifth recent study-- the anthropologist Don CitationHandelman has written a new interpretation of Israeli society. Nationalism and the Israeli State: Bureaucratic Logic in Public Events is an innovative analysis that operates at several levels. Handelman argues that the Russian-Jewish founders of the state brought with them a “top-down” Czarist conception of how the state should order society for the “common good”, and that this produced a continuing emphasis upon bureaucracy. The book's middle chapters concentrate upon a series of “public events”, such as Israeli Remembrance Day and Independence Day, and Israeli memorialization practices (“The Presence of Absence”). Overall, Handelman emphasizes how state bureaucratic logic divides “Israelis” into a series of unequal social categories, and how public events are framed by Israeli nationalism and used to perpetuate social divisions. In certain respects his analysis is reminiscent of Kimmerling's study, and yet it differs substantially from the books reviewed by focusing upon a limited number of events and their cultural-historical structure. 6. The “colonization thesis” is discussed in Uri Ram ” Citation1993, and in Moshe Lissak Citation1996. Additional informationNotes on contributorsAlex Weingrod ALEX WEINGROD is Emeritus Professor of Anthropology, Ben Gurion University of the Negev
Publication Year: 2007
Publication Date: 2007-09-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot