Title: LIVE SURGICAL DEMONSTRATIONS IN UROLOGY: VALUABLE EDUCATIONAL TOOL OR PUTTING PATIENTS AT RISK?
Abstract: BJU InternationalVolume 106, Issue 11 p. 1571-1574 LIVE SURGICAL DEMONSTRATIONS IN UROLOGY: VALUABLE EDUCATIONAL TOOL OR PUTTING PATIENTS AT RISK? Ben Challacombe, Ben Challacombe The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK, *The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, †The Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorRobin Weston, Robin Weston The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK, *The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, †The Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorGeoff Coughlin, Geoff Coughlin The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK, *The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, †The Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorDeclan Murphy, Declan Murphy The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK, *The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, †The Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorProkar Dasgupta, Prokar Dasgupta The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK, *The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, †The Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author Ben Challacombe, Ben Challacombe The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK, *The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, †The Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorRobin Weston, Robin Weston The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK, *The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, †The Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorGeoff Coughlin, Geoff Coughlin The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK, *The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, †The Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorDeclan Murphy, Declan Murphy The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK, *The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, †The Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this authorProkar Dasgupta, Prokar Dasgupta The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, London, UK, *The Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, †The Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 15 November 2010 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09860.xCitations: 25 Ben Challacombe, The Urology Centre and Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King's College London, King's Health Partners, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK. e-mail: [email protected] Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1 Millat B, Fingerhut A, Cuschieri A. Live surgery and video presentations: seeing is believing . . . but no more: a plea for structured rigor and ethical considerations. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 845–7 10.1007/s00464-006-0264-4 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2 Guillonneau B. Live surgical demonstration: is it worthwhile? Nat Clin Pract Urol 2007; 4: 59 10.1038/ncpuro0728 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 Death following live surgery in Japan. 2007. Available at: http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20070607a5.html. Accessed 28 September 2010 Google Scholar 4 Lang F (Windfall Films). Surgery Live on Channel 4, October, 2009. Available at: http://www.channel4.com/explore/surgerylive/. Accessed 28 September 2010 Google Scholar 5 Cohen E. Dr Craig Rogers tweets mid operation, 2009. Available at: http://edition.cnn.com/2009/TECH/02/17/twitter.surgery/index.html. Accessed 28 September 2010 Google Scholar 6 Campbell AV. Why the body matters: uses and abuses of the human body in modern medicine. Singapore Med J 2009; 50: 451–5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 7 Chatelain P, Meier B, De La Serna F et al. Success with coronary angioplasty as seen at demonstrations of procedure. Lancet 1992; 340: 1202–5 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92900-Z CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8 Schmit A, Lazaraki G, Hittelet A, Cremer M, Le Moine O, Devière J. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during live endoscopy workshop demonstrations. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 695–9 10.1055/s-2005-870137 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9 Hollick EJ, Allan BD. Live surgery: national survey of United Kingdom ophthalmologists. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 1029–32 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.02.023 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Kruse A, Beilenhoff U, Axon AT, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Nurses and Associates. ESGE/ESGENA guideline for live demonstration courses. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 781–4 10.1055/s-2003-41592 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11 Montgomery P. RACS Position paper. Available at: http://www.surgeons.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Position_paperstTemplate=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfmtContentFileID=98772. Accessed 28 September 2010 Google Scholar 12 Sade RM, American Association for Thoracic Surgery Ethics Committee, Society of Thoracic Surgeons Standards and Ethics Committee. Broadcast of surgical procedures as a teaching instrument in cardiothoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136: 273–7 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.06.015 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume106, Issue11December 2010Pages 1571-1574 ReferencesRelatedInformation