Title: Phylogenetic trees and evolutionary forests
Abstract: Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and ReviewsVolume 14, Issue 2 p. 49-53 IssuesFree Access Phylogenetic trees and evolutionary forests Jonathan Marks, Jonathan Marks [email protected] Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001Search for more papers by this author Jonathan Marks, Jonathan Marks [email protected] Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001Search for more papers by this author First published: 13 April 2005 https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.20049Citations: 4AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1 Mayr E. 1950. Taxonomic categories and fossil hominids. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 15: 109–118. 2 Simpson GG. 1945. The principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bull Am Museum Nat Hist 85: 188. 3 Montagu A. 1997. Man's most dangerous myth: the fallacy of race, 6th ed. Pleasant Oaks, CA: AltaMira Press. 4 Goodman M. 1963. Serological analysis of the systematics of recent hominoids. Hum Biol 35: 377–436. 5 Diamond J. 1992. The third chimpanzee. New York: HarperCollins. 6 Schwartz JH, Tattersall I, Eldredge N. 1978. Phylogeny and classification of the primates revisited. Yearbook Phys Anthropol 21: 95–133. 7 E Delson, I Tattersall, JA Van Couvering, AS Brooks, editors. 2000. Encyclopedia of human evolution and prehistory. New York: Garland. 8 Kimbel W, Rak Y. 1993. The importance of species taxa in paleoanthropology and an argument for the phylogenetic concept of the species category. In: WH Kimbel, LB Martin, editors. Species, species concepts, and primate evolution. New York: Plenum Press. p 461–484. 9 Tattersall I. 1992. Species concepts and species identification in human evolution. J Hum Evol 22: 341–349. 10 Groves C. 2004. The why, what, and how of primate taxonomy. Int J Primatol 25: 1105–1126. 11 Groves C. 2001. Why taxonomic stability is a bad idea, or why are there so few species of primates (or are there?). Evol Anthropol 10: 192–198. 12 Mayr E. 1974. Cladistic analysis or cladistic classification? Z Zool Syst Evol 12: 94–128. 13 Schwartz J. 1984. Hominoid evolution: a review and a reassessment. Curr Anthropol 25: 655–672. 14 Skelton R, McHenry H. 1992. Evolutionary relationships among early hominids. J Hum Evol 23: 209–249. 15 Trinkaus E. 1990. Cladistics and the hominid fossil record. Am J Phys Anthropol 83: 1–11. 16 Hawks J. 2004. How much can cladistics tell us about early hominid relationships? Am J Phys Anthropol 125: 207–219. 17 Dennett DA. 1995. Darwin's dangerous idea. New York: Simon and Schuster. 18 Godfrey LR, Marks J. 1991. The nature and origins of primate species. Yearbook Phys Anthropol 34: 39–68. 19 Wildman DE, Uddin M, Liu G, Grossman LI, Goodman M. 2003. Implications of natural selection in shaping 99.4% nonsynonymous DNA identity between humans and chimpanzees: enlarging genus Homo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 7181–7188. 20 Chaline J, Dutrillaux B, Couturier J, Durand A, Marchand D. 1991. Un modéle chromosomique et paléobiogéograqphique d'évolution des primates supérieurs. Geobios 24: 105–110. 21 Barbulescu M, Turner G, Su M, Kim R, Jensen-Seaman M, Deinard A, Kidd K, Lenz J. 2001. A herv-k provirus in chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas, but not humans. Curr Biol 11: 779–783. 22 Marks J. 2002. Genes, bodies, and species. In: PN Peregrine, CR Ember, M Ember, editors. Physical anthropology: original readings in method and practice. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. p 14–28. 23 Simpson GG. 1963. The meaning of taxonomic statements. In: SL Washburn, editor. Classification and human evolution. Chicago: Aldine. p 1–31. 24 Andrews P. 2000. Hominidae. In: E Delson, I Tattersall, JA Van Couvering, AS Brooks, editors. Encyclopedia of human evolution and prehistory, 2d. ed. New York: Garland. p 308–309. 25 Schwartz JH, Collard M, Cela-Conde CJ. 2001. Systematics of “humankind.” Evol Anthropol 10: 1–3. 26 Foley R. 2001. In the shadow of the modern synthesis? Alternative perspectives on the last fifty years of paleoanthropology. Evol Anthropol 10: 5–14. 27 Wood BA, Collard M. 1999. The human genus. Science 284: 65–71. 28 Asfaw B, Gilbert WH, Beyene Y, Hart WK, Renne PR, WoldeGabriel G, Vrba ES, White TD. 2002. Remains of Homo erectus from Bouri, Middle Awash, Ethiopia. Nature 416: 317–320. 29 Wolpoff M. 1999. The systematics of Homo. Science 284: 1773. 30 White TD. 2003. Early hominids—diversity or distortion? Science 299: 1994–1997. 31 Schwartz JH. 2003. Another perspective on hominid diversity. Science 301: 763. 32 Conroy GC. 2002. Speciosity in the early homo lineage: too many, too few, or just about right? J Hum Evol 43: 759–766. 33 Mayr E. 1969. Principles of systematic zoology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 34 Simpson GG. 1961. Principles of animal taxonomy. New York: Columbia University Press. 35 Cela-Conde CJ, Ayala FJ. 2003. Genera of the human lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 7684–7689. 36 Durkheim E, Mauss M. 1901–2. De quelques formes primitives de classification. L'Année Sociol 6: 1–72. 37 Marks J. 2002. What it means to be 98% chimpanzee. Berkeley: University of California Press. 38 Huxley JS. 1957. The three types of evolutionary process. Nature 180: 454–455. Citing Literature Volume14, Issue2March 2005Pages 49-53 ReferencesRelatedInformation