Title: Salience as a Factor in the Impact of Issues on Candidate Evaluation
Abstract: Previous articleNext article No AccessArticlesSalience as a Factor in the Impact of Issues on Candidate EvaluationGeorge Rabinowitz, James W. Prothro, and William JacobyGeorge Rabinowitz, James W. Prothro, and William JacobyPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 44, Number 1Feb., 1982 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2130283 Views: 86Total views on this site Citations: 62Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1982 Southern Political Science AssociationPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Nahema Marchal, David S Watson The paradox of poor representation: How voter–party incongruence curbs affective polarisation, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 24, no.44 (Oct 2021): 668–685.https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211048502Richard F. Potthoff Radial Symmetry Does Not Preclude Condorcet Cycles If Different Voters Weight the Issues Differently, Economies 10, no.77 (Jul 2022): 166.https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10070166Stephen Bok, Daniel Martin, Maria Lee, James Shum Political differentiation and consolidation of choice in a U.S. media malaise environment: indirect effects of perceived alikeness on voter participation, SN Social Sciences 2, no.77 (Jun 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-022-00394-9Libby Jenke, Michael Munger Attention distribution as a measure of issue salience, Public Choice 191, no.3-43-4 (Aug 2019): 405–416.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-019-00711-6Pascal D. König, Thomas Waldvogel What matters for keeping or losing support in televised debates, European Journal of Communication 37, no.33 (Nov 2021): 312–329.https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231211046706Hannah L. Paul and Jennifer Fitzgerald The Dynamics of Issue Salience: Immigration and Public Opinion, Polity 53, no.33 (May 2021): 370–393.https://doi.org/10.1086/714144Alexander Agadjanian, Yusaku Horiuchi Has Trump Damaged the U.S. Image Abroad? Decomposing the Effects of Policy Messages on Foreign Public Opinion, Political Behavior 42, no.22 (Oct 2018): 581–602.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9511-3Thomas J. Leeper, Joshua Robison More Important, but for What Exactly? The Insignificant Role of Subjective Issue Importance in Vote Decisions, Political Behavior 42, no.11 (Aug 2018): 239–259.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9494-0Özgün Ünver, Tuba Bircan, Ides Nicaise Opinion-policy correspondence in public provision and financing of childcare in Europe, International Journal of Educational Research 101 (Jan 2020): 101576.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101576Colton Heffington, Brandon Beomseob Park, Laron K Williams The "Most Important Problem" Dataset (MIPD): a new dataset on American issue importance, Conflict Management and Peace Science 36, no.33 (Mar 2017): 312–335.https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894217691463Linn A.C. Sandberg, Ulf Bjereld, Karina Bunyik, Markus Forsberg, Richard Johansson Issue Salience on Twitter During Swedish Party Leaders' Debates, Nordicom Review 40, no.22 (Oct 2019): 49–61.https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0033Christopher Wratil Territorial Representation and the Opinion–Policy Linkage: Evidence from the European Union, American Journal of Political Science 63, no.11 (Oct 2018): 197–211.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12403Gopakumar Achuthankutty, Souvik Roy On single-peaked domains and min–max rules, Social Choice and Welfare 51, no.44 (Jun 2018): 753–772.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-018-1137-1ERIC GRAIG CASTATER, KYUNG JOON HAN Trying not to lose: The electoral consequences of unilateral reform efforts and the social pact formation process, European Journal of Political Research 57, no.11 (Jun 2017): 171–193.https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12221François Pétry, Dominic Duval When heuristics go bad: Citizens' misevaluations of campaign pledge fulfilment, Electoral Studies (Sep 2017).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.09.010Patrick O. Asingo Policy Salience and Election Outcomes in Contemporary American Presidential Elections (1972-2000), Politics & Policy 45, no.44 (Aug 2017): 571–593.https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12210Alexander Agadjanian, Yusaku Horiuchi Source Cues or Policy Considerations: What Influences Foreign Public Opinion?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3039822Laron K. Williams Estimating the defense spending vote, Electoral Studies 39 (Sep 2015): 243–255.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2015.03.020Stefanie Reher The effect of congruence in policy priorities on electoral participation, Electoral Studies 36 (Dec 2014): 158–172.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.002Tony E. Carey, Regina P. Branton, Valerie Martinez-Ebers The Influence of Social Protests on Issue Salience among Latinos, Political Research Quarterly 67, no.33 (Sep 2014): 615–627.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914534074Nathalie Giger, Zoe Lefkofridi Salience-Based Congruence Between Parties & their Voters: The Swiss Case, Swiss Political Science Review 20, no.22 (Feb 2014): 287–304.https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12069Timothy B. Gravelle, Thomas J. Scotto, Jason Reifler, Harold D. Clarke Foreign policy beliefs and support for Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party, Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 20, no.22 (Nov 2014): 111–130.https://doi.org/10.1080/11926422.2014.936477Diego Fossati Economic vulnerability and economic voting in 14 OECD countries, European Journal of Political Research 53, no.11 (Mar 2013): 116–135.https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12019C. N. Avellaneda Mayoral Decision-Making: Issue Salience, Decision Context, and Choice Constraint? An Experimental Study with 120 Latin American Mayors, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23, no.33 (Oct 2012): 631–661.https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus041Ossip Fürnberg, Markus Steinbrecher Wen kümmern schon Inhalte? Die Bedeutung von Themenorientierungen für das Wahlverhalten in ausgewählten Bevölkerungsgruppen bei der Bundestagswahl 2009, (Apr 2013): 151–173.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01328-8_7Kai Oppermann, Alexander Spencer Thinking Alike? Salience and Metaphor Analysis as Cognitive Approaches to Foreign Policy Analysis, Foreign Policy Analysis 9, no.11 (Dec 2011): 39–56.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00167.xMarc J. Hetherington, Jason A. Husser How Trust Matters: The Changing Political Relevance of Political Trust, American Journal of Political Science 56, no.22 (Dec 2011): 312–325.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00548.xChristel Koop Explaining the Accountability of Independent Agencies: The Importance of Political Salience, Journal of Public Policy 31, no.0202 (Jun 2011): 209–234.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X11000080Jon A. Krosnick, Penny S. Visser, Joshua Harder The Psychological Underpinnings of Political Behavior, (Jun 2010).https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002034Robert Johns Measuring Issue Salience in British Elections, Political Research Quarterly 63, no.11 (Mar 2010): 143–158.https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908325254Ben Clements, John Bartle The European Issue and Party Choice at British General Elections, 1974–2005, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 19, no.44 (Oct 2009): 377–411.https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280903275188Samantha Laycock Experience versus Perceptions: Accounting for the NHS "Perception Gap", Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 19, no.44 (Oct 2009): 449–472.https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280903275295Kai Oppermann, Henrike Viehrig The Public Salience of Foreign and Security Policy in Britain, Germany and France, West European Politics 32, no.55 (Aug 2009): 925–942.https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903064804Éric Bélanger, Bonnie M. Meguid Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice, Electoral Studies 27, no.33 (Sep 2008): 477–491.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.001Kai Oppermann The Blair Government and Europe: The Policy of Containing the Salience of European Integration, British Politics 3, no.22 (Jun 2008): 156–182.https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2008.1Marisa A. AbrajanoR. Michael AlvarezJonathan Nagler The Hispanic Vote in the 2004 Presidential Election: Insecurity and Moral Concerns, The Journal of Politics 70, no.22 (Jul 2015): 368–382.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080365Christine A. Kelleher, Jennifer Wolak Priming Presidential Approval: The Conditionality of Issue Effects, Political Behavior 28, no.33 (Aug 2006): 193–210.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9011-8Stuart N. SorokaStuart N. Soroka is assistant professor and William Dawson Scholar in political science, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada. Good News and Bad News: Asymmetric Responses to Economic Information, The Journal of Politics 68, no.22 (Jul 2015): 372–385.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00413.xJeffrey D. Grynaviski, Bryce E. Corrigan Specification Issues in Proximity Models of Candidate Evaluation (with Issue Importance), Political Analysis 14, no.44 (Jan 2017): 393–420.https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpl003Christopher Wlezien On the salience of political issues: The problem with 'most important problem', Electoral Studies 24, no.44 (Dec 2005): 555–579.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.01.009Joanne M. MillerDavid A. M. Peterson Theoretical and Empirical Implications of Attitude Strength, The Journal of Politics 66, no.33 (Jul 2015): 847–867.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00279.xStuart N. Soroka Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy, Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8, no.11 (Sep 2016): 27–48.https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X02238783Paul W. Thurner The empirical application of the spatial theory of voting in multiparty systems with random utility models, Electoral Studies 19, no.44 (Dec 2000): 493–517.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00025-6Efraim Torgovnik Strategies under a New Electoral System, Party Politics 6, no.11 (Jan 2000): 95–106.https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068800006001006John Fuh-Sheng Hsieh, Emerson M.S. Niou Issue Voting in the Republic of China on Taiwan's 1992 Legislative Yuan Election, International Political Science Review 17, no.11 (Jan 1996): 13–27.https://doi.org/10.1177/019251296017001002Robert A. Bernstein Directing Electoral Appeals Away From the Center: Issue Position and Issue Salience, Political Research Quarterly 48, no.33 (Sep 1995): 479–505.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800302Michael G. Hagen References to racial issues, Political Behavior 17, no.11 (Mar 1995): 49–88.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498784John H. Aldrich, R. Michael Alvarez Issues and the presidential primary voter, Political Behavior 16, no.33 (Sep 1994): 289–317.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01498953Kathleen A. Bratton Retrospective Voting and Future Expectations, American Politics Quarterly 22, no.33 (Nov 2016): 277–296.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9402200302Donald T. Cundy Televised news, trait inferences, and support for political figures, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 38, no.11 (Jan 1994): 49–63.https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159409364245Jan Van den Bulck Estimating the Success of Political Communication Strategies: The Case of Political Poster Impact in a Belgian Election, European Journal of Communication 8, no.44 (Jul 2016): 471–489.https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323193008004004 J. David Gopoian Images and Issues in the 1988 Presidential Election, The Journal of Politics 55, no.11 (Oct 2015): 151–166.https://doi.org/10.2307/2132233Donald Granberg, Thad A. Brown The Perception of Ideological Distance, Western Political Quarterly 45, no.33 (Sep 2016): 727–750.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299204500309George E. Marcus Emotions and politics: hot cognitions and the rediscovery of passion, Social Science Information 30, no.22 (Jun 2016): 195–232.https://doi.org/10.1177/053901891030002001Robert S. Erikson, David W. Romero Candidate Equilibrium and the Behavioral Model of the Vote, American Political Science Review 84, no.44 (Aug 2014): 1103–1126.https://doi.org/10.2307/1963255Donald T. Cundy Image formation, the low involvement viewer, and televised political advertising, Political Communication 7, no.11 (Jan 1990): 41–59.https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1990.9962886George Rabinowitz, Stuart Elaine Macdonald A Directional Theory of Issue Voting, American Political Science Review 83, no.11 (Aug 2014): 93–121.https://doi.org/10.2307/1956436 James M. Enelow , Nancy R. Mendell , and Subha Ramesh A Comparison of Two Distance Metrics Through Regression Diagnostics of a Model of Relative Candidate Evaluation, The Journal of Politics 50, no.44 (Oct 2015): 1057–1071.https://doi.org/10.2307/2131392Stuart Elaine Macdonald, James W. Prothro, George Rabinowitz, Keith J. Brown Political evocation and styles of candidate evaluation, Political Behavior 10, no.22 (Jan 1988): 117–135.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991409 Richard G. Niemi , and Larry M. Bartels New Measures of Issue Salience: An Evaluation, The Journal of Politics 47, no.44 (Oct 2015): 1212–1220.https://doi.org/10.2307/2130815Samuel Long Abstracts of Documents in this Supplement, (Jan 1983): 1–590.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5956-0_1Éric Bélanger, Richard Nadeau Bibliographie, (): 163–173.https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pum.9791
Publication Year: 1982
Publication Date: 1982-02-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 101
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot