Abstract: Multisensory interactions are the norm in perception, and an abundance of research on the interaction and integration of the senses has demonstrated the importance of combining sensory information from different modalities on our perception of the external world [1Stein B.E. Stanford T.R. Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron.Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008; 9: 255-266Crossref PubMed Scopus (829) Google Scholar, 2Ernst M.O. Bülthoff H.H. Merging the senses into a robust percept.Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004; 8: 162-169Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1084) Google Scholar, 3Sekuler R. Sekuler A.B. Lau R. Sound alters visual motion perception.Nature. 1997; 385: 308Crossref PubMed Scopus (417) Google Scholar, 4Watanabe K. Shimojo S. Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events.Perception. 1998; 27: 1041-1054Crossref PubMed Scopus (79) Google Scholar, 5Shimojo S. Shams L. Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions.Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001; 11: 505-509Crossref PubMed Scopus (328) Google Scholar, 6Howard I.P. Templeton W.B. Human Spatial Orientation. Wiley, London1966Google Scholar, 7Bischoff M. Walter B. Blecker C.R. Morgen K. Vaitl D. Sammer G. Utilizing the ventriloquism-effect to investigate audio-visual binding.Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45: 578-586Crossref PubMed Scopus (31) Google Scholar, 8Alais D. Burr D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration.Curr. Biol. 2004; 14: 257-262Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 9McGurk H. MacDonald J. Hearing lips and seeing voices.Nature. 1976; 264: 746-748Crossref PubMed Scopus (3606) Google Scholar]. However, although research on mental imagery has revealed a great deal of functional and neuroanatomical overlap between imagery and perception, this line of research has primarily focused on similarities within a particular modality [10Kosslyn S.M. Ganis G. Thompson W.L. Neural foundations of imagery.Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001; 2: 635-642Crossref PubMed Scopus (1023) Google Scholar, 11Segal S.J. Fusella V. Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals.J. Exp. Psychol. 1970; 83: 458-464Crossref PubMed Scopus (233) Google Scholar, 12Wallace B. Apparent equivalence between perception and imagery in the production of various visual illusions.Mem. Cognit. 1984; 12: 156-162Crossref PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar, 13Borst G. Kosslyn S.M. Visual mental imagery and visual perception: structural equivalence revealed by scanning processes.Mem. Cognit. 2008; 36: 849-862Crossref PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholar, 14O’Craven K.M. Kanwisher N. Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stiimulus-specific brain regions.J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000; 12: 1013-1023Crossref PubMed Scopus (664) Google Scholar, 15Kamitani Y. Tong F. Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain.Nat. Neurosci. 2005; 8: 679-685Crossref PubMed Scopus (1229) Google Scholar, 16Ehrsson H.H. Geyer S. Naito E. Imagery of voluntary movement of fingers, toes, and tongue activates corresponding body-part-specific motor representations.J. Neurophysiol. 2003; 90: 3304-3316Crossref PubMed Scopus (418) Google Scholar] and has yet to address whether imagery is capable of leading to multisensory integration. Here, we devised novel versions of classic multisensory paradigms to systematically examine whether imagery is capable of integrating with perceptual stimuli to induce multisensory illusions. We found that imagining an auditory stimulus at the moment two moving objects met promoted an illusory bounce percept, as in the classic cross-bounce illusion; an imagined visual stimulus led to the translocation of sound toward the imagined stimulus, as in the classic ventriloquist illusion; and auditory imagery of speech stimuli led to a promotion of an illusory speech percept in a modified version of the McGurk illusion. Our findings provide support for perceptually based theories of imagery and suggest that neuronal signals produced by imagined stimuli can integrate with signals generated by real stimuli of a different sensory modality to create robust multisensory percepts. These findings advance our understanding of the relationship between imagery and perception and provide new opportunities for investigating how the brain distinguishes between endogenous and exogenous sensory events.