Title: Where does water go when it rains? Moving beyond the variable source area concept of rainfall‐runoff response
Abstract: Hydrological ProcessesVolume 17, Issue 9 p. 1869-1875 Invited Commentary Where does water go when it rains? Moving beyond the variable source area concept of rainfall-runoff response Jeffrey J. McDonnell, Corresponding Author Jeffrey J. McDonnell [email protected] Department of Forest Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USADepartment of Forest Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, USA.===Search for more papers by this author Jeffrey J. McDonnell, Corresponding Author Jeffrey J. McDonnell [email protected] Department of Forest Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USADepartment of Forest Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, USA.===Search for more papers by this author First published: 20 June 2003 https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5132Citations: 263AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL REFERENCES Beven KJ. 2001. How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 5(1): 1– 12. Bond B, Jones J, Moore G, Philips N, Post D, McDonnell JJ. 2002. The zone of vegetative influence on baseflow revealed by diel patterns of streamflow and vegetation water use in a headwater catchment. Hydrological Processes 16: 1671– 1677. Burns D, Hooper R, Kendall C, Freer J, McDonnell J, Beven K. 1999. Effect of hillslope flowpaths on subsurface base cation concentration. Water Resources Research 34(12): 3535– 3544. Burns DA, McDonnell JJ, Hooper RP, Peters NE, Freer JE, Kendall C, Beven K. 2001. Quantifying contributions to storm runoff through end-member mixing analysis and hydrologic measurements at the Panola Mountain Research Watershed (Georgia, USA). Hydrological Processes 15: 1903– 1924. Dunne T. 1978. Field studies of hillslope flow processes. In Hillslope Hydrology, MJ Kirkby (ed.). Wiley: Chichester; 227– 293. Dunne T. 1983. Relation of field studies and modeling in the prediction of storm runoff. Journal of Hydrology 65: 25– 48. Freer J, McDonnell JJ, Beven K, Burns D, Hooper R, Aulenbach B, Kendall C, Peters N. 2002. Understanding the spatial and temporal dynamic contributions of subsurface storm runoff at the hillslope scale. Water Resources Research 38(12): 5-1– 5-16. Hewlett JD, Hibbert AR. 1967. Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas. In Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on Forest Hydrology; 275– 253. Kirchner J. 2003. A double paradox in catchment hydrology and geochemistry. Hydrological Processes 17: 871– 874. Kirchner JW, Hooper RP, Kendall C, Neal C, Leavesley G. 1996. Testing and validating environmental models. Science of the Total Environment 183(1–2): 33– 47. McGlynn B, McDonnell JJ. 2003. The role of discrete landscape units in controlling catchment dissolved organic carbon dynamics. Water Resources Research 39(4): 3-1– 3-18. McHale M, McDonnell JJ, Mitchell M, Cirmo C. 2002. A field-based study of soil water and groundwater nitrate release in an Adirondack forested watershed. Water Resources Research 38(4): 2-1– 2-16. Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE, Torres R, Anderson SP, Loague K. 1997. Piezometric response of a small catchment. Water Resources Research 33(1): 91– 110. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV. 1970. River flow forecasting through conceptual models, I, a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology 10: 282– 290. Onda Y, Komatsu Y, Tsujimura M, Fujuhara I. 2001. Role of subsurface runoff through bedrock on storm flow generation. Hydrological Processes 15: 1693– 1706. Phillips JD. 2003. Sources of nonlinearity and complexity in geomorphic systems. Progress in Physical Geography 27: 1– 23. Seibert J, McDonnell JJ. 2002. On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: use of soft data for multi-criteria model calibration. Water Resources Research 38(11): 23-11– 23-14. Seibert J, Bishop K, Rodhe A, McDonnell J. 2003. Groundwater dynamics along a hillslope: a test of the steady-state hypothesis. Water Resources Research 39(1): 2-1– 2-9. Sivapalan S. 2003. Process complexity at hillslope scale, process simplicity at the watershed scale: is there a consensus? Hydrological Processes 17: 1037– 1042. Tromp van Meerveld I, McDonnell JJ. Submitted. Measured non-linearities in subsurface flow: a 147 storm analysis of the Panola hillslope trench. Water Resources Research. Uchida T, Kosugi K Mizumaya T. 2001. Effects of pipeflow on hydrological processes and its relation to landslide: a review pipeflow studies in forested headwater catchments. Hydrological Processes 15: 2151– 2174. Uhlenbrook S, Leibundgut C. 2002. Process-oriented catchment modelling and multiple-response validation. Hydrological Processes 16: 423– 440. Vitvar T, Burns D, Lawrence G, McDonnell JJ, Wolock D. 2002. Estimation of baseflow residence times in watersheds using the runoff recession hydrograph. Hydrological Processes 16: 1871– 1877. Weiler M, McDonnell JJ. 2003. Virtual experiments: a new approach for improving process conceptualization in hillslope hydrology. Journal of Hydrology in press. Citing Literature Volume17, Issue930 June 2003Pages 1869-1875 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Publication Year: 2003
Publication Date: 2003-06-20
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 351
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot