Title: Passion as the foundation of natural law in the German enlightenment: Johann Jacob Schmauss and J.H.G. von Justi
Abstract: Abstract One of the leading political and economic German thinkers in the eighteenth century, Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi (1717–1771), transformed the cameral sciences into sciences of state (Staatswissenschaft) by giving them a foundation in natural law. The aim of this article is to show that the natural law of Justi was not, as has previously often been claimed, the anti-voluntarist, metaphysical and rational natural law of Christian Wolff. Quite the contrary: Justi was a follower of one of Wolff's most fervent opponents, Johann Jacob Schmauss (1690–1757), whose natural law was radically voluntaristic and anti-metaphysical. Justi's natural law must be seen as part of a larger transformation that took place in the natural law theories of the German Enlightenment. Building on the ideas of Johann Jacob Schmauss, Justi was part and parcel of the change from reason-based natural law into a theory that put the main emphasis on human instinct and passions as the source of moral action. These universal instincts were argued to be the foundation of natural rights, which as this article demonstrates, could be extended to entail human rights. Keywords: passioninstinctnatural lawenlightenmentJohann Jacob SchmaussJohann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi Notes 1. For an overview of natural law theory in the German Enlightenment, see Haakonssen, Knud Haakonssen, Knud. "German natural law". In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought Edited by: Goldie, M. and Wokler, R. 251–90. (Cambridge 2006) [Google Scholar]. "German natural law." In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, ed. M. Goldie and R. Wokler (Cambridge 2006), 251–90. On the Reception of Hobbes in Germany, Dreitzel, Horst Dreitzel, Horst. 2003. The Reception of Hobbes in the Political Philosophy of the Early German Enlightement. History of European Ideas, 29: 255–89. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]. "The Reception of Hobbes in the Political Philosophy of the Early German Enlightenment." History of European Ideas 29 (2003): 255–89. For a study where Pufendorf is interpreted as Hobbesian see Palladini Palladini, Fiammetta. 2008. Pufendorf Disciple of Hobbes: The Nature of Man and the State of Nature: The Doctrine of Socialitas. History of European Ideas, 34: 26–60. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], "Pufendorf Disciple of Hobbes: The Nature of Man and the State of Nature: The Doctrine of Socialitas." 2. See Ahnert Ahnert, Thomas. 2004. Pleasure, Pain and Punishment in the Early Enlightenment: German and Scottish Debates. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik. Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 12: 173–87. [Google Scholar]. "Pleasure, Pain and Punishment in the Early Enlightenment: German and Scottish Debates," 174. 3. Schmauss, Vorstellung des wahren Begriffs von einem Recht der Natur, 17. See also Scattola Scattola, Merio. 2009. "Das Naturrecht der Triebe, oder das Ende des Naturrechts: Johann Jakob Schmauß und Johann Christian Claproth". In Das Naturrecht der Geselligkeit. Anthropologie, Recht und Politik im 18. Jahrhundert, Edited by: Fiorillo, Vanda and Grunert, Frank. 231–50. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. [Google Scholar], "Das Naturrecht der Triebe, oder das Ende des Naturrechts: Johann Jakob Schmauß und Johann Christian Claproth," 237. See also Grunert Grunert, Frank. 2004. Das Recht der Natur als Recht des Gefühls. Zur Naturrechtslehre von Johann Jacob Schmauss. Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik. Annual Review of Law and Ethics, 12: 137–53. [Google Scholar], "Das Recht der Natur als Recht des Gefühls. Zur Naturrechtslehre von Johann Jacob Schmauss," 140. 4. For Schmauss's biography see Frensdorff Frensdorff, Ferdinand. "Schmauß, Johann Jacob". In Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie Leipzig, 1890, Vol. 31 (1890), 628–31 [Google Scholar], "Schmauß, Johann Jacob." 5. Korkman Korkman, Petter. 2008. "The Vital String of Mankind – Sociability and the Foundation of Natural Law and Universal Rights". In Universalism in International Law and Political Philosophy Edited by: Korkman, Petter and Mäkinen, Virpi. 5–34. Helsinki [Google Scholar], "The Vital String of Mankind – Sociability and the Foundation of Natural Law and Universal Rights." 6. 6. Haakonssen, "German Natural Law," 252. 7. Quoted after Ahnert, "Pleasure, Pain," 173. 8. Grunert, "Das Recht der Natur", 137–138. 9. Feder, Johann Georg Heinrich. Grundriss der philosophischen Wissenschaften, 340. Coburg, 1769. Quoted after Dreitzel, "Reception," 281, footnote 70. 10. Scattola, "Das Naturrecht", 244. 11. Ahnert, "Problematische Bindungswirkung", 48–54. 12. For an introduction to Justi's life and writings see Frensdorff, Über das Leben. For an introduction to Justi's political and economic thought Adam, The Political Economy. 13. Justi Justi, Johann Heinrich Gottlob von. 1969. Natur und Wesen der Staaten als die Quelle aller Regierungswissenschaften und Gesetze, Edited by: Scheidemantel, Heinrich Godfried. Aalen: Scientia. Mittau 1771 [1760] [Google Scholar], Natur und Wesen der Staaten als die Quelle aller Regierungswissenschaften und Gesetze, Bödeker, "Das Staatswissenschaftliche Fächersystem im 18. Jahrhundert." 152. 14. For the latest example of several authors making this claim see Backhaus Backhaus, Jürgen Georg. 2009. "From Wolff to Justi". In The Beginnings of Political Economy. Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi, Edited by: Backhaus, Jürgen Georg. 3–18. New York: Springer. [Google Scholar], "From Wolff to Justi." 11–14. 15. Bachmann Bachmann, Hanns-Martin. 1977. Die naturrechtliche Staatslehre Christian Wolffs, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. [Google Scholar], Die naturrechtliche Staatslehre Christian Wolffs, 32–51. Wolff's philosophical system is best described by his method that was called mathematical, geometrical, demonstrative, philosophic or scientific. Wolff and his scholars preferred to call their method mathematical. Wolff, who was originally a mathematician, basically wanted to make the chain of proofs the same way in politics as he had in mathematics by deriving truths deductively. 16. Dreitzel Dreitzel, Horst. 1987. "Justis Beitrag zur Politisierung der deutschen Aufklärung". In Aufklärung als Politisierung – Politisierung der Aufklärung, Edited by: Bödeker, Hans Erich and Hermann, Ulrich. 158–77. Hamburg: Meiner. [Google Scholar], "Justis Beitrag zur Politisierung der deutschen Aufklärung." 161. 17. Justi established his fame in opposition to Wolff, when he won an essay competition organised by the Prussian academy with his essay Nichtigkeit und Ungrund der Monaden (1747), where he criticised Leibniz's and Christian Wolff's theory of monads. 18. Dreitzel Dreitzel, Horst. 1992. Absolutismus und ständische Verfassung in Deutschland: ein Beitrag zu Kontinuität und Diskontinuität der politischen Theorie in der frühen Neuzeit, Mainz: von Zabern. [Google Scholar], Absolutismus und ständische Verfassung in Deutschland: ein Beitrag zu Kontinuität und Diskontinuität der politischen Theorie in der frühen Neuzeit, 106. 19. Haakonssen, "German Natural Law," 259. 20. Klippel, Politische Freiheit, 84–8. Dreitzel, "Absolutismus," 106. 21. Schmauss, Vorstellungen, 10–11. 22. Scattola, "Das Naturrecht," 239, 245–246. 23. Schmauss Schmauss, Johann Jacob. 1748. Vorstellung des wahren Begriffs von einem Recht der Natur, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck. [Google Scholar], Vorstellungen, 3. 24. Schmauss Schmauss, Johann Jacob. 1754. Neues Systema des Rechts der Natur, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck. [Google Scholar], Neues Systema des Rechts der Natur, 453. 25. Schmauss, Neus Systema des Rechts der Natur, 526. 26. Schmauss, Neues Systema, 454, 460. 27. Schmauss, Neues Systema, 512. 28. Schmauss, Neues Systema, 461. 29. Hochstrasser Hochstrasser, T.J. 2000. Natural Law Theories in the early Enlightenment, Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], Natural Law Theories in the early Enlightenment, 147–8. 30. Schmauss, Vorstellungen, 4. 31. Scattola, "Das Naturrecht," 237, 241. 32. Grunert, "Das Recht der Natur," 140. 33. Schmauss, Vorstellungen, 13–14. 34. Scattola, "Das Naturrecht," 241. 35. Schmauss, Vorstellungen, 20–1. 36. Schmauss, Neues Systema, 462–3, 476. 37. Schmauss, Neues Systema, 528. 38. Schmauss, Neues Systema, 514–15. 39. [Anon.], M.N. Sendschreiben, 6–7. 40. Schmauss, Neues Systema, 526. 41. Schmauss, Neues Systema, 462–3. 42. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 149, 378–9. 43. Grunert, "Das Recht der Natur," 149, footnote 47; Klippel, Politische Freiheit, 86. 44. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 382. 45. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 379. 46. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 381. 47. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 384. 48. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 384–5. 49. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 421. 50. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 423. 51. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 442–3. 52. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 381. 53. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 381, 443. 54. See especially Ahnert, "Pleasure, Pain," 174, 180, 184. 55. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 430. 56. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 435. 57. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 443. 58. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 430. 59. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 408, 424. 60. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 598. 61. Justi, Natur und Wesen, 408–10. 62. Justi Justi, Johann Heinrich Gottlob von. 1759. Grundriß einer guten Regierung, Frankfurt and Leipzig: Johann Gottlieb Garbe. [Google Scholar], Grundriß einer guten Regierung, 44–5.
Publication Year: 2010
Publication Date: 2010-02-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 2
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot