Title: Consistency in Genetic Models of the Sexy Son: Reply to Curtsinger and Heisler
Abstract: Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsConsistency in Genetic Models of the Sexy Son: Reply to Curtsinger and HeislerMark KirkpatrickMark KirkpatrickPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 132, Number 4Oct., 1988 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/284876 Views: 4Total views on this site Citations: 11Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1988 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:G.A Parker Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 361, no.14661466 (Jan 2006): 235–259.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1785Oliver Y Martin, David J Hosken Reproductive Consequences of Population Divergence through Sexual Conflict, Current Biology 14, no.1010 (May 2004): 906–910.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.04.043Oliver Y. Martin, David J. Hosken, Paul I. Ward Post–copulatory sexual selection and female fitness in Scathophaga stercoraria, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 271, no.15371537 (Feb 2004): 353–359.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2588Oliver Y. Martin, David J. Hosken COSTS AND BENEFITS OF EVOLVING UNDER EXPERIMENTALLY ENFORCED POLYANDRY OR MONOGAMY, Evolution 57, no.1212 (Jan 2003): 2765.https://doi.org/10.1554/03-179Gil G. Rosenthal, Maria R. Servedio CHASE-AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: RESISTANCE TO "RESISTANCE", Evolution 53, no.11 (May 2017): 296–299.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05356.xTREVOR PRICE, DOLPH SCHLUTER, NANCY E. HECKMAN Sexual selection when the female directly benefits, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 48, no.33 (Jan 2008): 187–211.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb00887.xRobert Craig Sargent, Mart R. Gross Williams' principle: an explanation of parental care in teleost fishes, (Jan 1993): 333–361.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1578-0_11Mark Kirkpatrick Direct selection of female mating preferences: Comments on Grafen's models, Journal of Theoretical Biology 154, no.11 (Jan 1992): 127–129.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80193-6Andrew Pomiankowski, Yoh Iwasa, Sean Nee THE EVOLUTION OF COSTLY MATE PREFERENCES I. FISHER AND BIASED MUTATION, Evolution 45, no.66 (May 2017): 1422–1430.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb02645.xRichard S. Gomulkiewicz, Alan Hastings PLOIDY AND EVOLUTION BY SEXUAL SELECTION: A COMPARISON OF HAPLOID AND DIPLOID FEMALE CHOICE MODELS NEAR FIXATION EQUILIBRIA, Evolution 44, no.44 (May 2017): 757–770.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1990.tb03803.x James W. Curtsinger , and I. Lorraine Heisler On the Consistency of Sexy-Son Models: A Reply to Kirkpatrick, The American Naturalist 134, no.66 (Oct 2015): 978–981.https://doi.org/10.1086/285026
Publication Year: 1988
Publication Date: 1988-10-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 13
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot