Title: How Matters: Women's International League for Peace and Freedom's Trips to the Middle East, 1931–1975
Abstract:This paper follows a 1975 WILPF's “fact‐finding trip” to the Middle East and compares it to previous WILPF's official and unofficial trips to the area. My purpose is to analyze and to assess the exten...This paper follows a 1975 WILPF's “fact‐finding trip” to the Middle East and compares it to previous WILPF's official and unofficial trips to the area. My purpose is to analyze and to assess the extent to which these trips can be called “feminist” and the extent to which feminism makes a difference in the kind of “fact‐finding trip” that is undertaken and its results. Though there arguably exist several “feminisms,” I argue that certain common elements exist that make political actions feminist. Historians of WILPF (such as Gertrude Bussey, Margaret Tims, Harriet Alonso, Leila Rupp) have primarily focused on the ideological and political aspects of WILPF's feminist peace politics. Instead, I am interested in how feminism can inform the methodology of peace politics. I take the example of WILPF's trips to the Middle East to specifically illustrate how a peace politics, sustained by feminist methodological principles, is more fully “peaceful.” Without those principles any political action risks replicating structures of oppression, which are both the bases for violent conflict and the foundations for unjust systems, which then cannot be called “peace.”Read More
Publication Year: 2013
Publication Date: 2013-06-10
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 2
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot