Title: Validation of the modified <scp>R</scp>anson versus <scp>G</scp>lasgow score for pancreatitis in a <scp>S</scp>ingaporean population
Abstract: Abstract Background The characteristics of patients with acute pancreatitis in multi‐ethnic S ingapore differ from that of the populations used in formulating the modified R anson and G lasgow scores. The use of these scoring systems has not previously been validated in the S ingaporean setting. This study aims to validate and compare the prognostic use of the modified R anson and G lasgow scores, and to determine the superiority of one score over the other in predicting the outcome for acute pancreatitis in the S ingaporean population. Methods This is a 3‐year retrospective study of patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis at our centre. Patients with chronic pancreatitis, acute on chronic pancreatitis, iatrogenic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer as well as those with incomplete R anson or G lasgow scores were excluded from the study. Case notes and computer records were reviewed for local complications of pancreatitis and organ failure. Receiver operator characteristic ( ROC ) curves of the R anson and G lasgow scores were plotted for the prediction of severity and mortality. Results Between J anuary 2010 and D ecember 2012, 230 cases were diagnosed with acute pancreatitis. A majority of the patients had mild pancreatitis ( n = 194, 84.3%), and the overall 30‐day mortality rate was 3.5% ( n = 8). ROC of the R anson and G lasgow scoring systems for mortality showed an area under curve ( AUC ) of 0.854 ( P = 0.001) and 0.776 ( P = 0.008), respectively. For severity, the AUC for the modified R anson and G lasgow score was calculated to be 0.694 and 0.668, respectively. Conclusions The ROC curves of R anson and G lasgow scores for mortality are comparable with that published in earlier studies. In a Singaporean population, the R anson score is more accurate in the prediction of mortality. However, both scoring systems are poor predictors for severity of acute pancreatitis.
Publication Year: 2015
Publication Date: 2015-04-29
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref', 'pubmed']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 13
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot