Abstract: Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1 Aristotle's function argument actually applies to human beings, not objects. The function, or end, of human beings is to be fulfilled. Allocating resources should be such as to enable each to live a flourishing human life. 2 The central argument of the Idea of Justice had already been made in Sen (2006 Sen, A. 2006. What do we want from a theory of justice. Journal of Philosophy, 103(5): 215–238. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). 3 For how the capability approach fits into liberal egalitarianism, see Robeyns (2009 Robeyns, I. 2009. “Equality and justice”. In An Introduction to the Human Development and Capability Approach: Freedom and Agency, Edited by: Deneulin, S. and Shahani, L. London: Earthscan/IDRC. [Google Scholar]). 4 Sen (2000 Sen, A. 2000. Consequential evaluation and practical reason. Journal of Philosophy, 97(9): 477–502. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) does not reject the consequentialism of utilitarianism but broadens it to non-utility considerations. 5 See Sánchez Garrido (2009 Sánchez Garrido, P. 2008. Raíces intelectuales de Amartya Sen: Aristóteles, Adam Smith y Karl Marx, Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales. book review in Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 2009, 10(2), pp. 305–306 [Google Scholar]) for a thorough description of the eclectic nature of Sen's thinking. 6 Sen has notoriously refrained from specifying the valuable freedoms that constitute the capability evaluation space. See Robeyns (2003 Robeyns, I. 2003. Sen's Capability Approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3): 61–92. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), Sen (2004 Sen, A. 2004. Capabilities, lists and public reason: continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics, 10(3): 77–80. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Alkire (2002 Alkire, S. 2002. Valuing Freedoms, Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar], 2007 Alkire, S. 2007. “Choosing dimensions: the capability approach and multidimensional poverty”. In The Many Dimensions of Poverty, Edited by: Kakwani, N. and Silber, J. New York: Palgrave. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]) for a discussion of the valuation of freedoms.