Title: Социогуманитарные основания концепций проблематизации
Abstract: The article is devoted to the analysis of the modern concepts of problematization in the works of G. Deleuze, Michel Foucault, G.P. Schedrovitsky. The notion of problematization gradually shapes almost independently and simultaneously in the works of Michel Foucault and G.P. Schedrovitsky during three decades (1960-1980s), which, according to the authors, is of significant methodological and conceptual importance in their philosophical systems. Data of G. Deleuze on reconstruction of F. Nietzsche's philosophical position is the study of a unique experience of problematization in the history of both philosophy and western culture generally. Problematization became a special object of philosophical analysis in the second half of the twentieth century due to the criticism of the scientific paradigm of knowledge, especially, questions on the socio-cultural, interdisciplinary and activity characteristics of the modern knowledge, on mass distribution of the projective types of thinking and activity (design, programming and etc.). Problematization is considered by the authors as a mechanism of social changes and the emergence of the «new» in the culture and society. The common ground of the concepts is the problem of the historicity of thought, which defines the modern understanding of the conditions and mechanisms of the emergence of the experience of the subject of development and, accordingly, the socio-humanitarian nature of the concepts of problematization. The problem of the historicity of thought defines the notion of experience in the concepts of problematization as a fundamentally historical entity. For Deleuze, Nietzsche's experience of problematization is aimed at understanding the cultural transition to the images of a person capable of thinking, establishing and approving the variety and novelty, but such a transition is possible in culture only on the basis of overcoming the constraints of dogmatic ways of thinking. By Foucault, the «new» in the culture appears in the processes of problematization of ideas, norms, style, etc. within a certain range of practices and becomes a source of transforming the experience of subjects. G.P.Schedrovitsky considers problematization as transferring «problems» from scientific logic-epistemological plans to the contexts of strategies, programmes and plans of socio-cultural action of subjects of development, which is the source of creation and fixing of the new in culture and social life. It allows us to consider problematization as a condition for the genesis of the experience of subjectivity of development and to confirm the hypothesis of the socio-humanitarian nature of problematization. Thus, the notion «socio-humanitarian» in the context of anthropological subjects is connected with the study of the modern nature of the subject of development and conditions of the genesis of the experience of subjectivity of development. Reconstruction of the socio-humanitarian grounds of the concepts of problematization is a valuable material for the formation of targets of the philosophical analysis of socio-humanitarian mechanisms and trends of modern innovation processes
Publication Year: 2010
Publication Date: 2010-01-01
Language: en
Type: article
Access and Citation
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot