Abstract: According to Carl Schmitt, the limits of law exposed by emergencies debunk not only legal theory, but also what we might think of as the political theory of liberal democracy, since Schmitt rightly took liberal democracy to be committed to the rule of law. The considerable theoretical interest of Oren Gross's extra-legal measures model of how a liberal democratic state should respond to an emergency lies in how he might be said to turn Schmitt's claim that the 'exception proves everything' to liberalism's advantage. Gross's argument is that one can and should accept Schmitt's claim that a state of emergency exposes the limits of law. Nevertheless, the extra-legal measures model, in showing why it is appropriate for the executive to respond illegally in catastrophic situations, not only leaves liberal democracy and the rule of law intact, but even strengthened.
Publication Year: 2008
Publication Date: 2008-11-13
Language: en
Type: book-chapter
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 45
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot