Publication Year: 1974
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03637757409375845
Abstract: The study attraction construct. Two‐hundred and fifteen subjects completed 30 Likert‐type, seven‐step reports scales concerning an acquaintance. Factor analysis indicated three dimensions of a the interpersonal attraction construct which were labeled "task" "social" and factor "physical." The results of this study and four replications suggest analytic that the resulting 15‐item Show more
Authors:
Publication Year: 1979
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.12
Abstract: Not available
Authors:
Publication Year: 1961
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044721
Abstract: Not available
Authors:
Publication Year: 1956
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046141
Abstract: Not available
Authors:
Publication Year: 1973
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.24.020173.001533
Abstract: A revolution recent decades, with the potential to create a paradigm shift in in decision theories. The research reveals that emotions constitute potent, the pervasive, predictable, sometimes harmful and sometimes ...Read More science of emotion has emerged in
Authors:
Publication Year: 1978
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.29.020178.000555
Abstract: A revolution recent decades, with the potential to create a paradigm shift in in decision theories. The research reveals that emotions constitute potent, the pervasive, predictable, sometimes harmful and sometimes ...Read More science of emotion has emerged in
Authors:
Publication Year: 1965
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022386
Abstract: Not available
Authors:
Publication Year: 1975
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7894(75)80087-6
Abstract: Not available
Authors:
Publication Year: 1985
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420150105
Abstract: Abstract Two and per se versus no explicit categorization/random categorization/criterial categorization on the psychological basis of affect) factorial design employing the ‘minimal group’ paradigm. group People who like each other and were not explicitly categorized formation formed a group. This effect was enhanced by criterial categorization are but disappeared when Show more
Authors:
Publication Year: 2005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370500270322
Abstract: Three decades introduced to the field. A substantial number of research studies ago have been reported that employed one or more of these measures measures. This research was examined to evaluate their reliability and of validity. It is concluded that all of these measures are interpersonal reasonably reliable and valid. Show more
Authors:
Publication Year: 1985
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4820-7_9
Abstract: Not available
Authors:
Publication Year: 1983
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053001005
Abstract: This article which competition, individualistic efforts, and cooperation with intergroup competition; (b) cooperation physical with intergroup competition promotes greater interpersonal attraction among participants than proximity does interpersonal competition or individualistic efforts; and (c) there tends and to be no significant difference between interpersonal competition and individualistic interaction efforts in promoting Show more
Authors:
Publication Year: 2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617064-8
Abstract: Not available
Authors:
Publication Year: 1978
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/017531
Abstract: Originally published Vol 23(9), 692. Reviews the book, Interpersonal attraction, 2nd ed in by Ellen Berscheid and Elaine Hatfield Walster (1978). This edition Contemporary is larger than the first, mainly because of two expanded Psychology: chapters on romantic and companionate love. These are also are APA probably the best chapters Show more
Authors:
Publication Year: 2004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.696
Abstract: Three studies cognitive implications of these data for existing attraction theory are discussed, evaluation and a new model of interpersonal attraction is described. of the target individual was the primary determinant examined of interpersonal attraction. In Study 1, the cognitive evaluation of a the target individual mediated the influence of Show more
Authors:
Found 61274 results in 0.228 seconds
Including any of the words AND
, OR
, or NOT
in any of your searches will enable
boolean search. Those words must be UPPERCASE. You can use this in all searches, including using
the search parameter, and using search filters.
This allows you to craft complex queries using those boolean operators along with parentheses and quotation marks.
Surrounding a phrase with quotation marks will search for an exact match of that phrase, after stemming and
stop-word removal (be sure to use double quotation marks — "
). Using parentheses will specify order of
operations for the boolean operators. Words that are not separated by one of the boolean operators will be
interpreted as AND
.
Behind the scenes, the boolean search is using Elasticsearch's query string query on the searchable fields (such as
title, abstract, and fulltext for works; see each individual entity page for specifics about that entity). Wildcard
and fuzzy searches using *
, ?
or ~
are not allowed; these characters will be
removed from any searches. These searches, even when using quotation marks, will go through the same cleaning as
described above, including stemming and removal of stop words.
Search for works that mention "elmo"
and "sesame street"
, but not the words
"cookie"
or "monster"
:
"elmo" AND "sesame street" NOT "cookie" NOT "monster"