Title: Where in the (World Wide) Web of Belief is the Law of Non‐contradiction?*
Abstract: NoûsVolume 41, Issue 2 p. 276-297 Where in the (World Wide) Web of Belief is the Law of Non-contradiction?* Jack Arnold, Jack Arnold The Ohio State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorStewart Shapiro, Stewart Shapiro The Ohio State UniversityUniversity of St. AndrewsSearch for more papers by this author Jack Arnold, Jack Arnold The Ohio State UniversitySearch for more papers by this authorStewart Shapiro, Stewart Shapiro The Ohio State UniversityUniversity of St. AndrewsSearch for more papers by this author First published: 06 June 2007 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00647.xCitations: 8 * Acknowledgments: Many thanks to Louise Antony, J. C. Beall, Hartry Field, Fraser MacBride, Robert Meyer, Otavio Bueno, Graham Priest, Agustín Rayo, Mark Steiner, Neil Tennant, and Crispin Wright. Thanks also to the Arché Centre at the University of St. Andrews, the Society for Exact Philosophy, the Oxford Philosophical Society, the Hebrew University Philosophy Colloquium, and the Buffalo Logic Colloquium for devoting sessions to this paper. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Anderson, A. and N. Belnap 1975], Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity I, Princeton , Princeton University Press. Google Scholar Anderson, A. and N. Belnap, and M. Dunn 1992], Entailment: The logic of relevance and necessity II, Princeton , Princeton University Press. Google Scholar Bennett, Jonathan 1958], “ Analytic-synthetic”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59 (1958–9), 163–188. Google Scholar Berger, Alan 1980], “Quine on ‘alternate logics’ and verdict tables”, Journal of Philosophy 77, 259–277. 10.2307/2025755 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bueno, Otávio, and Mark Colyvan 2004], “ Logical non-apriorism and the law of non-contradiction”, in The law of non-contradiction: new philosophical essays, edited by in G. Priest, J. C. Beall, and B. Armour-Garb, Oxford , Oxford University Press, 156–175. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265176.003.0010 Google Scholar Burgess, J. 1992], “ Proofs about proofs: A defense of classical logic”, in Proof, logic and formalization, edited by Michael Detlefsen, London , Routledge Publishing Company, 8–23. Google Scholar Burgess, J. 2004], “Quine, analyticity and philosophy of mathematics”, Philosophical Quarterly 54. 38–55. 10.1111/j.0031-8094.2004.00341.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Colyvan, M. 2003], “ Naturalism and the paradox of revisability”, presented at the 2003 Australasian Association of Philosophy Conference at the University of Adelaide, Australia . Google Scholar Davidson, D. and J. Hintikka 1969], Words and objections: essays on the work of W. V. Quine, Dordrecht , D. Reidel Publishing Company. Google Scholar Goodman, Nelson 1955], “ The new riddle of induction”, in Fact, fiction and forecast, Cambridge , Massachusetts , Harvard University Press, 59–83. Google Scholar Lewis, D. 1982], “ Logic for equivocators”, Noûs 16, 431–441; reprinted in D. Lewis, Papers in philosophical logic, Cambridge , Cambridge University Press, 1998, 97–110. Google Scholar Priest, G. 1987], In contradiction: a study of the transconsistent, Dordrecht , Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 10.1007/978-94-009-3687-4 Google Scholar Priest, G. 2003], “On alternative geometries, arithmetics, and logics; a tribute to Łukasiewicz”, Studia Logica 74, 441–468. 10.1023/A:1025123418085 Google Scholar Quine, W. V. O. 1951], “Two dogmas of empiricism”, Philosophical Review 60, 20–43. 10.2307/2181906 Google Scholar Quine, W. V. O. 1960], Word and object, Cambridge , Massachusetts , The MIT Press. Google Scholar Quine, W. V. O. 1969], “ Replies”, in Davidson and Hintikka [1969], 292–352. Google Scholar Quine, W. V. O. 1981], “What price bivalence?”, Journal of Philosophy 78, 90–95. 10.2307/2025901 Web of Science®Google Scholar Quine, W. V. O. 1986], Philosophy of logic, second edition, Englewood Cliffs , New Jersey , Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar Quine, W. V. O. 1991], “Two dogmas in retrospect”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21, 265–274. Web of Science®Google Scholar Resnik, M. 1997], Mathematics as a science of patterns, Oxford , Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Shapiro, S. 1998], “ Logical consequence: models and modality”, in The philosophy of mathematics today, edited by M. Schirn, Oxford , Oxford University Press, 131–156. Web of Science®Google Scholar Shapiro, S. 2000], “ The status of logic”, New essays on the a priori, edited by Paul Boghossian and Christopher Peacocke, Oxford University Press, 2000, 333–366; reprinted in part as “Quine on Logic”, Logica Yearbook 1999, edited by Timothy Childers, Prague , Czech Academy Publishing House, 11–21. 10.1093/0199241279.003.0014 Web of Science®Google Scholar Sorenson, R. 1988], Blindspots, Oxford , Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Sorenson, R. 2001], Vagueness and contradiction, Oxford , Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Steiner, M. 1992], “ Mathematical rigor in physics”, in Proof and knowledge in mathematics, edited by Michael Detlefsen, London and New York , Routledge, 158–170. Google Scholar Tennant, N. 1987], Anti-realism and logic, Oxford , Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Williamson, T. 1994], Vagueness, London and New York , Routledge Publishing Company. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume41, Issue2June 2007Pages 276-297 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Publication Year: 2007
Publication Date: 2007-06-01
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 42
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot