Title: Changes in an inherited ring (22) due to meiotic recombination? Implications for genetic counseling
Abstract: American Journal of Medical Genetics Part AVolume 149A, Issue 6 p. 1310-1314 Research Letter Changes in an inherited ring (22) due to meiotic recombination? Implications for genetic counseling† Vaidehi Jobanputra, Vaidehi Jobanputra Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, New YorkSearch for more papers by this authorErin Ash, Erin Ash Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New YorkSearch for more papers by this authorKwame Anyane-Yeboa, Kwame Anyane-Yeboa Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New YorkSearch for more papers by this authorDorothy Warburton, Dorothy Warburton Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University, New York, New YorkSearch for more papers by this authorBrynn Levy, Corresponding Author Brynn Levy [email protected] Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, New YorkGenetic Diagnostics Laboratory, Columbia University Medical Center, 3959 Broadway, Rm CHC-406, New York, NY 10032.Search for more papers by this author Vaidehi Jobanputra, Vaidehi Jobanputra Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, New YorkSearch for more papers by this authorErin Ash, Erin Ash Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New YorkSearch for more papers by this authorKwame Anyane-Yeboa, Kwame Anyane-Yeboa Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, New YorkSearch for more papers by this authorDorothy Warburton, Dorothy Warburton Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University, New York, New YorkSearch for more papers by this authorBrynn Levy, Corresponding Author Brynn Levy [email protected] Department of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, New YorkGenetic Diagnostics Laboratory, Columbia University Medical Center, 3959 Broadway, Rm CHC-406, New York, NY 10032.Search for more papers by this author First published: 15 May 2009 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32680Citations: 5 † How to cite this article: Jobanputra V, Ash E, Anyane-Yeboa K, Warburton D, Levy B. 2009. Changes in an inherited ring (22) due to meiotic recombination? Implications for genetic counseling. Am J Med Genet Part A 149A:1310–1314. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL REFERENCES Boyd L, Livingston J, Brown M, Lawce H, Gilhooly J, Wildin R, Linck L, Magenis RE, Pillers D. 2005. Meiotic exchange event within the stalk region of an inverted chromosome 22 results in a recombinant chromosome with duplication of the short arm. Am J Med Genet Part A 138A: 355– 360. Crusi A, Engel E. 1986. Prenatal diagnosis of 3 cases of ring G chromosomes: One 21 and two 22, one of which was de novo. Ann Genet 29: 253– 260. Dallapiccola B, De Filippis V, Notarangelo A, Perla G, Zelante L. 1986. Ring chromosome 21 in healthy persons: Different consequences in males and females. Hum Genet 73: 218– 220. Flejter WL, Finlinson D, Root S, Nguyen W, Brothman AR, Viskochil D. 1996. Familial ring (19) chromosome mosaicism: Case report and review. Am J Med Genet 66: 276– 280. Fryns JP, Van den Berghe H. 1979. Ring chromosome 22 in a mentally retarded child and mosaic 45,XX,-15,-22,+t(15;22)(p11;q11)/46,XX,r(22)/46,XX karyotype in the mother. Hum Genet 47: 213– 216. Jeffries AR, Curran S, Elmslie F, Sharma A, Wenger S, Hummel M. 2005. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of ring chromosome 22. Am J Med Genet Part A 137A: 139– 147. Kosztolanyi G, Mehes K, Hook EB. 1991. Inherited ring chromosomes: An analysis of published cases. Hum Genet 87: 320– 324. Luciani JJ, de Mas P, Depetris D, Mignon-Ravix C, Bottani A, Prieur M, Jonveaux P, Philippe A, Bourrouillou G, de Martinville B, Delobel B, Vallee L, Croquette MF, Mattei MG. 2003. Telomeric 22q13 deletions resulting from rings, simple deletions, and translocations: Cytogenetic, molecular, and clinical analyses of 32 new observations. J Med Genet 40: 690– 696. Schinzel A. 2001. Catalogue of unbalanced chromosome aberrations in man. 2nd edition. New York, Berlin: de Gruyter. Speevak MD, Smart C, Unwin L, Bell M, Farrell SA. 2003. Molecular characterization of an inherited ring (19) demonstrating ring opening. Am J Med Genet Part A 121A: 141– 145. Stoll C, Roth MP. 1983. Segregation of a 22 ring chromosome in three generations. Hum Genet 63: 294– 296. Teyssier M, Moreau N. 1985. Familial transmission of deleted chromosome 22 [r(22)p0?] in two normal women. Ann Genet 28: 116– 118. Wenger SL, Boone LY, Cummins JH, Del Vecchio MA, Bay CA, Hummel M, Mowery-Rushton PA. 2000. Newborn infant with inherited ring and de novo interstitial deletion on homologous chromosome 22s. Am J Med Genet 91: 351– 354. Citing Literature Volume149A, Issue6June 2009Pages 1310-1314 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Publication Year: 2009
Publication Date: 2009-05-15
Language: en
Type: article
Indexed In: ['crossref', 'pubmed']
Access and Citation
Cited By Count: 9
AI Researcher Chatbot
Get quick answers to your questions about the article from our AI researcher chatbot